Daily Archives: August 12, 2020

NJ: Once SW issues for cell phone, foregone conclusion exception to self-incrimination applies and password can be compelled

Once a search warrant issues for a cell phone, there is no privilege of self-incrimination in the phone barring compelled production of the password. The foregone conclusion exception to the Fifth Amendment applies. State v. Andrews, A-72-18 (N.J. Aug. 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on NJ: Once SW issues for cell phone, foregone conclusion exception to self-incrimination applies and password can be compelled

CA7: Prison inmates have 4A reasonableness protection against abusive strip and body cavity searches

Prison inmates retain a Fourth Amendment reasonableness right against abusive strip and body cavity searches enough to state a claim here. Qualified immunity is reserved for later. Henry v. Hulett, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25390 (7th Cir. Aug. 11, 2020) … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Prison inmates have 4A reasonableness protection against abusive strip and body cavity searches

CA11: Def’s failure to claim cell phone once it was released was abandonment

Police released defendant’s cell phone two days after its seizure, but defendant never sought to recover it. This was considered an abandonment. Standing to challenge CSLI could be an issue because the phones weren’t claimed, but, without deciding that, the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA11: Def’s failure to claim cell phone once it was released was abandonment

N.D.Ill.: Reasonable reliance on apparent authority is good faith in itself

Reasonable reliance on apparent authority to consent is good faith. “And relying on consent in good faith is circular and redundant. Whether there is apparent authority to consent already addresses the officers’ good-faith belief in the consenters’ authority. Put differently, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Reasonable reliance on apparent authority is good faith in itself

CA11: While unclear whether 4A applies to pretrial detainees, 14A does and standards the same

As pretrial detainee, it’s unclear whether the Fourth Amendment applies to his claims. The Fourteenth Amendment clearly does, and, in any event the standards would be applied the same. Patel v. Lanier County, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 25345 (11th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA11: While unclear whether 4A applies to pretrial detainees, 14A does and standards the same

AZ: Offer of proof would be helpful for Franks claim, and def didn’t make one here

“As noted above, however, some of these alleged omissions and misstatements are simply not supported by the record. And, the omissions that are supported by the record were not material given the strength of the evidence supporting a finding of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on AZ: Offer of proof would be helpful for Franks claim, and def didn’t make one here