Category Archives: Automobile exception

CA5: No factual findings of exigency for automobile exception applies; remanded

Defendant was followed to his house from a bank robbery, and his car was searched in the driveway. However, “[i]n this case, the district court did not make factual findings about whether exigent circumstances were present sufficient to justify a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of proof, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: No factual findings of exigency for automobile exception applies; remanded

UT won’t require warrant under automobile exception

“Rigby contends that the Utah Constitution provides its citizens greater protection against unreasonable searches than the United States Constitution because Utah courts have required police officers to have both probable cause and exigent circumstances when performing a warrantless search under … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on UT won’t require warrant under automobile exception

IL: Warrantless blood draws pre-Neely are valid under GFE

Illinois law before McNeely permitted warrantless blood draws, and pre-McNeely searches would be valid under Davis good faith. People v. Harrison, 2016 IL App (5th) 150048, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS 73 (Feb. 18, 2016). A 2254 petitioner gets a COA … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Warrantless blood draws pre-Neely are valid under GFE

NY3: Nighttime search was justified, and defendant wasn’t even home

Police justified a nighttime search warrant at defendant’s house. He was a suspect in a robbery with a knife to the victim’s throat where the victim was forced into an apartment. In the ensuing struggle, the victim said the suspect … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Nighttime search | Comments Off on NY3: Nighttime search was justified, and defendant wasn’t even home

OH: “The arrest of a recent occupant of a legally parked vehicle does not, by itself, establish reasonableness to justify a warrantless search of the vehicle the arrestee had been riding in.”

The Ohio Supreme Court today reversed a case where I criticized the court of appeals decision back in June 2014 as wrong. The Supreme Court today held that the arrest of a recent occupant of a car does not ipso … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on OH: “The arrest of a recent occupant of a legally parked vehicle does not, by itself, establish reasonableness to justify a warrantless search of the vehicle the arrestee had been riding in.”

ID: Automobile exception applied to suitcases with suspect MJ removed from a Greyhound bus

The automobile exception here was applied to two suitcases on a Greyhound bus that stopped in Boise. The bus driver was adjusting bags after removing bags for those getting off in Boise, and he could smell marijuana coming from a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on ID: Automobile exception applied to suitcases with suspect MJ removed from a Greyhound bus

SD: A pipe with residue on the person is PC for an automobile exception search

The officer decided to stop defendant who was parked under a “no parking” sign. When he approached the vehicle, an open container was visible between the driver and passenger seats. It turned out defendant’s DL was revoked. While normally a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception | Comments Off on SD: A pipe with residue on the person is PC for an automobile exception search

S.D.N.Y.: Mistake of law wasn’t reasonable and stop suppressed; Heien distinguished

Defendant was stopped because one taillight was dimmer than the other, but not burned out. The court finds the stop was unreasonable and not a mistake of law under Heien, and the motion to suppress is granted. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Mistake of law wasn’t reasonable and stop suppressed; Heien distinguished

E.D.Pa.: No external signs dwelling was a triplex; search valid under Garrison

This property was under surveillance for seven days, and only defendant and his girlfriend coming and going. Police did an Accurint search about the address and nothing suggested that it was a triplex. Nothing outside said it was, and there … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: No external signs dwelling was a triplex; search valid under Garrison

MA: Detailed description of car involved in two robberies near in time and location to when it was seen was PC

The officer had a wealth of information for probable cause to stop and search defendant’s car for two robberies. The fact that six hours elapsed between the two didn’t make the first one stale. Defendant’s argument the officers acted in … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Detailed description of car involved in two robberies near in time and location to when it was seen was PC

OH11: Smell of MJ coming from def’s person during traffic stop justifies search of person

Drifting over the center line was reasonable suspicion for a stop, and the smell of marijuana on the defendant’s person justified a search of the person. State v. Glenn, 2015-Ohio-4832, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 4722 (11th Dist. Nov. 23, 2015). … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Smell of MJ coming from def’s person during traffic stop justifies search of person

ID: Auto search doesn’t have to stop where items in plain view were seized

Observation of contraband in plain view justified a search of a vehicle. The officer did not have to stop when he seized that which was first seen. State v. Anderson, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 118 (Nov. 17, 2015). Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Auto search doesn’t have to stop where items in plain view were seized

OR: Passenger’s backpack in car was subject to automobile exception

Passenger’s backpack in the vehicle at the time of the stop was subject to the automobile exception. State v. Furrillo, 274 Ore. App. 612, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1291 (Nov. 4, 2015). Defendant’s admission during a stop on reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OR: Passenger’s backpack in car was subject to automobile exception

D.Nev.: Parolee with traffic warrants fleeing from car and tossing keys justified parole search of car

Las Vegas officers were randomly running license plates and they ran a Saturn’s plates on a Walgreen’s parking lot after the occupant went into the store. It showed that the owner had outstanding traffic warrants and was on parole. The … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Parolee with traffic warrants fleeing from car and tossing keys justified parole search of car

D.Minn.: Backseat passenger of driver doing hand-to-hand transactions subject to frisk

The driver of the car defendant was a backseat passenger in conducted hand-to-hand transactions, and that give probable cause for a search of the car by the automobile exception. The search of the backseat passenger was valid as a frisk … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Backseat passenger of driver doing hand-to-hand transactions subject to frisk

C.D.Ill.: Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search

Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search. United States v. Sidwell, 440 F.3d 865, 869 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. Garcia, 983 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search

N.D.W.Va.: Correcting a date in affidavit for SW in front of USMJ was hardly improper, particularly when the correct date was put in

Three month old information about an IP address in a child pornography case wasn’t stale. Also, the warrant wasn’t issued without probable cause just because the warrant was amended in handwriting before the magistrate, particularly because the correct date was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Correcting a date in affidavit for SW in front of USMJ was hardly improper, particularly when the correct date was put in

OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime

To justify the automobile exception in Oregon, the vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime. If parked, a warrant must be sought. State v. Belander, 274 Ore. App. 167, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1175 (September … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime

W.D.Ark.: Warrantless DNA sample 16 days after arrest was unreasonable

Warrantless taking a DNA sample from an arrestee under state law but 16 days after his arrest violated the Fourth Amendment. If it was at the time of booking, it would have been reasonable. Nominal damages awarded. Lewis v. Brazell, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Warrantless DNA sample 16 days after arrest was unreasonable

WaPo: The Fourth Amendment shuffle

WaPo: The Fourth Amendment shuffle by Radley Balko: New Jersey was one of the last states to require police to obtain a warrant before searching your vehicle during a traffic stop. No more. The state’s highest court has ruled that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on WaPo: The Fourth Amendment shuffle