C.D.Ill.: Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search

Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search. United States v. Sidwell, 440 F.3d 865, 869 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. Garcia, 983 F.2d 1160, 1167 (1st Cir. 1993). United States v. Fifer, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139948 (C.D.Ill. Oct. 14, 2015).

The video of defendant’s driving supported the lane change stop. State v. Burbridge, 2015 Iowa App. LEXIS 913 (Oct. 14, 2015).*

Defendant’s evading arrest in a car also led to a search under the automobile exception. The search incident doctrine did not apply under defendant’s theory that the car could not be searched under the search incident doctrine for evidence of evading arrest. United States v. Appleberry, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140650 (E.D.Tenn. July 20, 2015).*