N.D.W.Va.: Correcting a date in affidavit for SW in front of USMJ was hardly improper, particularly when the correct date was put in

Three month old information about an IP address in a child pornography case wasn’t stale. Also, the warrant wasn’t issued without probable cause just because the warrant was amended in handwriting before the magistrate, particularly because the correct date was put in. United States v. Singo, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139457 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 14, 2015), R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139456 (N.D.W.Va. July 8, 2015).

Defendant was a known drug dealer who packaged heroin at a particular house. Officers were surveilling the house and defendant arrived, went inside, and left. The stop and search was with probable cause under the automobile exception, and defendant’s attempt to use the more recent Bailey was unavailing. United States v. Shaw, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139418 (W.D.Mo. Oct. 14, 2015).*

Post-conviction court holds that defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging a stop and search of a car that was valid under Belton [omitting that it was overruled in 2009 and the trial in this case was 2013; so they appoint hearing commissioners that haven’t opened a law book in 20 years?]. State v. Lum, 2015 Del. Super. LEXIS 519 (Oct. 12, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.