E.D.Pa.: No external signs dwelling was a triplex; search valid under Garrison

This property was under surveillance for seven days, and only defendant and his girlfriend coming and going. Police did an Accurint search about the address and nothing suggested that it was a triplex. Nothing outside said it was, and there was one mail slot. When the warrant was executed, they discovered that it was. Still, execution of the warrant was valid under Garrison. United States v. Andrews, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173776 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 29, 2015).

Officers observed a hand-to-hand transaction in a car, and they ran the LPN and the owner, Daniel, matched the description of the man sitting in it. They approached the car and defendant, now out of the car, started walking away, but he was stopped. A second officer saw defendant drop a baggie of drugs when talking to the first officer. The other officer reported (captured on camera) that he could smell marijuana coming from defendant’s car, and that was probable cause for a search of the car. The credibility finding of the district court is supported by the video and is virtually unreviewable. United States v. Daniel, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 25 (8th Cir. Jan. 5, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.