Category Archives: Consent

IA: No REP in ER room from police entry for observations and questions

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the ER room he was being treated in when the officer entered, observed him clearly intoxicated, and then elicited admissions from him. (The court considered both trespass and reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IA: No REP in ER room from police entry for observations and questions

E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

Defendant was essentially a squatter who was wrongfully on the premises and had no standing. The owner lived on the second floor, and he squatted on the first floor for months. The building was condemned. His claim the owner’s tolerating … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

E.D.Mo.: Evidence of the search comes in because it “completes the story”

“‘Evidence of other wrongful conduct is considered intrinsic when it is offered for the purpose of providing the context in which the charged crime occurred.’ … ‘Intrinsic evidence may help to fill the gaps in the jury’s understanding of the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Evidence of the search comes in because it “completes the story”

D.Mass.: Gun suppressed in FIPF case still not excludable in violation of supervised release

Defendant was an alleged felon in possession and was charged with a new federal crime and a violation of his supervised release. He was sentenced to 22 months on the violation. The gun was suppressed in the new gun case … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Gun suppressed in FIPF case still not excludable in violation of supervised release

N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

Shareholders cannot bring a Fourth Amendment claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party. Elfand v. Adams, 2024 NY Slip Op 24289, 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19021 (N.Y. Co. Nov. 18, 2024). The CI’s information led to a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

No search warrant is needed for the jail to turn over plaintiff’s jail telephone calls to the DA’s office. Wallace v. Maricopa Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209545 (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024).* When an officer invokes the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

W.D.N.Y.: The fact the issuing magistrate read fast didn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached

The fact the issuing magistrate had to read 65 pages in 21 minutes doesn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached. “The Court is not persuaded by Defendant’s assessment of Judge Morrison’s reading speed, which relies wholly on speculation.” United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: The fact the issuing magistrate read fast didn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached

D.Alaska: Arriving passenger stopped in airport consented to search

“Here, in contrast, Ms. Spadaro was an arriving passenger; her airplane ticket was a nonissue. There is no indication that law enforcement took her identification from her. And, despite her several requests to use the restroom, the audio recording supports … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Arriving passenger stopped in airport consented to search

OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

The record supported the finding that defendant’s wife consented to the search. Her behavior, including standing in the open doorway and not protesting the officer’s entry, indicated implied consent. In addition, the court found that he did not expressly deny … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

FL5: Weaving justified welfare check stop

Defendant’s obvious weaving justified at least a welfare check stop that was reasonable. State v. Sheldon, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7892 (Fla. 5th DCA Oct. 8, 2024). 2254 petitioner doesn’t show that he didn’t get a full and fair opportunity … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on FL5: Weaving justified welfare check stop

E.D.Okla.: Housing authority’s warning of a pest inspection permitted under lease agreement amounts to no REP

The housing authority told plaintiff they were coming in for a pest inspection and did under the conditions of the lease. That was reasonable, and there was no violation of a reasonable expectation of privacy when the inspectors saw drugs. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Housing authority’s warning of a pest inspection permitted under lease agreement amounts to no REP

AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

“Because probable cause does not require certainty, but only probability, we agree with the trial court that the fact that officers cannot distinguish between hemp and marijuana based on odor alone ‘does not void probable cause.’ … Other jurisdictions have … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AL: Officer being unable to differentiate smell of MJ and hemp doesn’t negate PC

OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

Neither the state nor federal exclusionary rule does not apply in criminal dangerous person civil commitments. State v. T.L.B. (In re T.L.B.), 335 Or. App. 225 (Sep. 25, 2024). The officer here saw defendant walking at night in a neighborhood … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

Defendant left his car at a convenience store’s gas pumps for 30-40 minutes. The police dog sniff while it was parked was not unreasonable. It was not a stop to be extended. Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Dog sniff of already parked car didn’t require RS

FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

Illegally parking [actually standing] in a handicapped spot was an objective basis for defendant’s stop. State v. Diaz, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7143 (Fla. 6th DCA Sep. 13, 2024).* Defendant’s mother’s consent was validly obtained just as a protective sweep … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

The officer reasonably relied on a report from dispatch that defendant had a DV order of protection against him by his wife. After the stop and the inventory for towing his car, his estranged wife showed up with a copy … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

Defendant consented to a search of his iPhone, but here the officer reinstalled the Telegram app and then used it to search defendant’s Telegram account, finding child porn. All this exceeded his consent. There is no case in point because … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Reinstalling a deleted app to an iPhone to get to def’s account exceeded the scope of consent to search the phone

OH10: Mental health facilities are heavily regulated and consent to administrative searches

Residential mental health facilities are heavily regulated and consented to inspections as a condition of licensing. My Friend’s Place in Unity v. Ohio Dep’t of Mental Health, 2024-Ohio-3257, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3067 (10th Dist. Aug. 27, 2024). Plaintiff’s Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH10: Mental health facilities are heavily regulated and consent to administrative searches

NE: Despite municipal code requiring refusal of consent, 4A doesn’t require that before SW issues

The Omaha Municipal Code required refusal of consent before an inspection warrant is issued. The officer had probable cause for code violations when he sought the warrant. The warrant will not be suppressed because there is no Fourth Amendment requirement … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent | Comments Off on NE: Despite municipal code requiring refusal of consent, 4A doesn’t require that before SW issues

CAAF: Remote erasure of seized cell phone supported tampering conviction

Defendant’s conviction for interfering with a seizure under UCMJ 131e is affirmed. NIS had seized the phone but not yet put it in a Faraday bag to protect it when she remotely erased it. United States v. Strong, 2024 CAAF … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CAAF: Remote erasure of seized cell phone supported tampering conviction