Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

D.Md.: Claim for “constructive seizure” fails

Plaintiff doesn’t state a claim for a “constructive seizure” by telling someone else of a warrant being out. Gladden v. Bd. of Educ. of Harford Cty., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45075 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2026).* Defendant’s ineffective assistance of … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Md.: Claim for “constructive seizure” fails

TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

Failure to allege what should have been suppressed if a motion to suppress had been filed is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Coyne v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Mar. 3, 2026). Qualified immunity denied: … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

Off-site copying of defendant’s cell phone after the warrant’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B). United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990 (11th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

D.Conn.: Officers muting microphones to discuss extending stop helped show Rodriguez violation

The stop was justified, but the stop was unreasonably extended for the drug dog that didn’t alert. Then the officers muted their microphones for 40 seconds before a search of defendant’s person. “The officers’ choice to spend several minutes on … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Officers muting microphones to discuss extending stop helped show Rodriguez violation

CT: Last person to contact victim alive was PC for his phone

Defendant was sexually involved with the victim, and he apparently was the last person to see her alive, and had contact with her after she disappeared. That was probable cause. State v. Johnson, 2026 Conn. LEXIS 19 (Feb. 3, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CT: Last person to contact victim alive was PC for his phone

OH7: Male driver’s consent to search his truck included the purse of his female passenger

The driver’s consent to search his truck included the purse of his female passenger. State v. Mort, 2026-Ohio-249 (7th Dist. Jan. 28, 2026). Motion to suppress filed after sixth trial setting wasn’t timely. On the merits, the claim of lack … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH7: Male driver’s consent to search his truck included the purse of his female passenger

N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure. Keith v. Romain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13105 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2026). Police responded to a bar on a ShotSpotter report, but it was for naught. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

Defendant was at a park with his child and he saw someone he knew who he went to and talked to. Police started coming for the other person, so he left him and went back to his child. Then two … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

E.D.Mich.: No standing in mobile home defendant burned down

In direct appeal of his conviction, defendant was found not to have standing in the mobile home he burned because he no longer had any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. He’s Stoned out on habeas too. Sindone v. Miniard, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No standing in mobile home defendant burned down

WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

Refusal of a BAC can legitimately have civil consequences without violating the Fourth Amendment per Birchfield. Here it was a 2008 refusal that led to an interlock in 2013 that was recently violated. State v. Sparby-Duncan, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

CA7: 911 call about DV in progress in house was exigency for entry

“Here we conclude that, based on the undisputed facts, the officers had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that someone in Cannon’s home needed immediate aid and that there was a compelling need to enter without a warrant. The officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA7: 911 call about DV in progress in house was exigency for entry

NMI: “An arrest warrant is exhausted once used.”

“An arrest warrant is exhausted once used. Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524, 546 (1952); ….” After that, another must issue. The trial court didn’t err in requiring one. Commonwealth v. Superior Court, 2025 MP 14 (N.M.I. Dec. 23, 2025). … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on NMI: “An arrest warrant is exhausted once used.”

HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

Where the defense didn’t argue a lack of probable cause at the suppression hearing, that could not be raised on appeal. State v. Arbogast, 2025 Haw. App. LEXIS 617 (Dec. 23, 2025) (unpublished).* Defendant’s stop was reasonable and his spontaneous … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Failure to argue PC at suppression hearing was waiver for appeal

CA6: Offer of proof required on missing suppression hearing witness for IAC claim

When claiming a witness wasn’t called at a suppression hearing as an ineffective assistance claim, there has to be an offer of proof as to what the witness would have testified to with a showing of how it would affect … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: Offer of proof required on missing suppression hearing witness for IAC claim

W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing the state constitution in a federal criminal case. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256220 (W.D. La. Dec. 10, 2025). “Here, the affidavit detailed the information on which the officer relied, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

The use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial. United States v. Blythe, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231852 (D.D.C. Nov. 23, 2025) (interesting read). Just because defense counsel didn’t appeal a losing Fourth Amendment issue doesn’t make … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Privileges | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

The drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl but alerted on it. It was trained on cocaine and did alert on it. That doesn’t make the dog unreliable. After probable cause developed, using the key fob to open the car wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

OH5: Pleading guilty without seeing SW materials stated enough to get post-conviction hearing

The state’s plea offer was to plead without getting any discovery. Defendant adequately pled defense counsel was ineffective for counseling this, including waiving getting access to the search warrant materials. The trial court erred in denying a hearing. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH5: Pleading guilty without seeing SW materials stated enough to get post-conviction hearing

S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

A murder for hire scheme was exigency for a warrantless search. Here, the officers thought the firearm would be moved imminently on December 31, 2024, but the warrant wasn’t signed until after midnight January 1, 2025. It wasn’t automatically stale, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

D.N.D.: Tactical decision not to raise every 4A issue def can think up

Not raising before conviction all the conceivable Fourth Amendment claims defendant thought were useful was a reasonable tactical decision. Perez v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220629 (D.N.D. Nov. 7, 2025). “As the trial court noted, approximately one minute … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.D.: Tactical decision not to raise every 4A issue def can think up