Category Archives: Franks doctrine

N.D.Ala.: SW not invalid because issuing judge previously represented the target

A search warrant isn’t invalid just because the issuing magistrate previously represented the defendant in a drug case as a defense lawyer. The judge didn’t violate the state’s Code of Judicial Conduct either. Besides, the good faith exception applies because … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: SW not invalid because issuing judge previously represented the target

Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

Defendant’s DNA left at the scene of two rapes was abandoned, and the state didn’t need a warrant to search it. People v. Konther, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 369 (4th Dist. June 12, 2026). In a drug case bench trial, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

D.R.I.: Defense attorney’s affidavit for Franks motion was insufficient for lack of personal knowledge

The defense attorney’s affidavit for defendant’s Franks motion is insufficient because he had no direct knowledge. There was probable cause for the warrant. United States v. Rosario, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125981 (D.R.I. June 8, 2026). Protective sweep for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Defense attorney’s affidavit for Franks motion was insufficient for lack of personal knowledge

IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

Defendant’s backpack is not as much a personal repository as a wallet or purse. When officers ordered the occupants out of the car, the backpack was at defendant’s feet, and he was ordered to leave it behind. The inventory was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

The state search warrant in this case was not served within three days as required by Ohio law. That did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and he shows no prejudice. United States v. Calhoun, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121202 (N.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Failure to serve state SW within state mandated time not 4A violation

TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

“In this case, the evidence was that, although the Defendant lived in the van, the van was registered to someone else, and the vehicle registration indicated the same. The doors to the van were wide open and it was parked … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

The juvenile here acted like he was carrying a weapon and he had on a ski mask in June in New Orleans. That was reasonable suspicion. State In the Int. of L.V., 2026 La. App. LEXIS 1070 (La. App. 4 … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the seizure of ketamine off a codefendant. [Even better for him,] There was no probable cause for his warrantless arrest. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, defendant gets to reopen the suppression issue. Here, the officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

CA2: Taking 3-day-old son from mother affected father’s 4A & 14A rights too

Plaintiff stated a claim for relief under the due process clause and Fourth Amendment for the City taking his 3-day-old son from his mother based on actions of her other boyfriends without any court order. He was three years getting … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Due process, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA2: Taking 3-day-old son from mother affected father’s 4A & 14A rights too

D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress

The protective sweep of defendant’s room is suppressed because the government articulates no reasonable suspicion to believe anyone else was in there. Delay in opening the door isn’t it. Searching between the mattress and box springs was also unreasonable. Waiting … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress

CA1 declines to get into whether undocumented persons are “people” with 4A rights

The First Circuit declines to get into the issue of whether an undocumented person here is part of the “people” with Fourth Amendment rights, instead deciding he loses on the merits. United States v. Vizcaíno-Peguero, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13000 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Immigration arrests, immigration searches, Standing | Comments Off on CA1 declines to get into whether undocumented persons are “people” with 4A rights

CA4: The fact that ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

Defendant was charged with witness intimidation for contact with a witness in a criminal case of his. That charge was later dropped, and he sued. Defendants didn’t violate Franks by not mentioning that he never did it again. That’s not … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: The fact that ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

Defendant argues that the return must be the original copy of the warrant issued by the judge per statute. It was a copy. Even if it was a mistake, it was ministerial from which there was no prejudice. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

The officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t have happened. The remainder says two controlled buys, and these were found to be isolated transactions, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Search incident, Staleness | Comments Off on MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

In a fraud case, the government took years to search the computers. A second warrant was obtained for some. The government doesn’t get to undo the delay by a new warrant, but the deterrence rationale of the exclusionary rule applies. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: It took the govt years to search def’s computers, and the court has to balance that huge delay with the truth-seeking function in resolving it

CA10: Use of flashlight to aid a drone is still plain view

Officers were waiting for a search warrant to enter premises to look for a person. With consent of a neighbor, an officer climbed higher to use a flashlight to aid an overhead drone at night, seeing a gun on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Drones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Use of flashlight to aid a drone is still plain view

D.Mass.: A failed attempt at an admin warrant and Franks violation

A contractor doing remodeling to a Bearded Dragon online business told the City about health code violations on the premises after he walked off the job. A health department officer walked through with permission and noted no violations. Later, an … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: A failed attempt at an admin warrant and Franks violation

CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

Plaintiff was arrested for murder of his wife, but the case was dismissed without prejudice. He claimed a civil Franks violation. There was still arguable probable cause even with that which was omitted. No claim. Morphew v. Chaffee Cty., 2026 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf’s dismissed murder case for overlooked exculpatory evidence was still based on PC

E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

The CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved isn’t really a Franks violation. United States v. Mooneyham, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67746 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2026). Plaintiff reasonably believed that one of the officers was sitting on him … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material