C.D.Cal.: Franks challenge succeeds in FIPF case

The search warrant for felon in possession was based on the officer affiant’s assertion defendant was a convicted felon but it was based on evaluation of paperwork from Georgia that showed he was a first offender without judgment of guilt having been entered. It was at least reckless. Franks challenge granted, and search suppressed. United States v. Mensah, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33659 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2024).

“The trial judge did not err by denying Smith’s motion to suppress because Terrell had probable cause to initiate a traffic stop for careless driving, Terrell and Dyer developed reasonable suspicion to prolong the stop to include a DUI investigation, and they had probable cause to search Smith’s vehicle once Jack alerted them to the presence of drugs in the vehicle.” Smith v. State, 2024 Miss. App. LEXIS 85 (Feb. 27, 2024).*

“Corporal Grenci’s observation of Garcia driving with an earbud in one ear, without the other ear visible, was enough to support a stop for further investigation. The use of one earbud violates Section 3314(a) unless an exception applies.” Commonwealth v. Garcia, 2024 PA Super 33 (Feb. 27, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.