Category Archives: Privileges

S.D.Tex.: No 5A protection on phone pass code, and inevitable discovery applies

The foregone conclusion rationale for access to passcodes for cell phones. There was no Fifth Amendment privilege to providing the passcodes. Inevitable discovery applies. United States v. Zhengdong Cheng, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6437 (S.D.Tex. Jan. 12, 2022):

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: No 5A protection on phone pass code, and inevitable discovery applies

N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

The psychotherapist-patient privilege does not bar use of a report from defendant’s psychotherapist to law enforcement that defendant admitted viewing child pornography. The psychotherapist discussed with others and concluded that a report was necessary. Whatever the privilege for trial, it … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s psychotherapist reported he was viewing CP; 4A does not prohibit using it in SW application

WI: Contempt for failing to provide passcode for search of phone is reversed because it is now moot by SW

The owner of a cell phone was held in contempt for not providing a passcode to his phone so police could search it. They did not yet have a warrant. After defendant was held in contempt, the police obtained a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on WI: Contempt for failing to provide passcode for search of phone is reversed because it is now moot by SW

IL: The foregone conclusion doctrine applies to providing passcode to search a cell phone

The foregone conclusion doctrine applies to obtaining the passcode to a cell phone to search it. Thus, production of the passcode is non-testimonial for the Fifth Amendment. People v. Sneed, 2021 IL App (4th) 210180, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 637 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on IL: The foregone conclusion doctrine applies to providing passcode to search a cell phone

OH11: No standing in father’s cell phones even when communicating with defense experts

Defendant is charged with killing his wife. He didn’t have standing to challenge a search warrant for his father’s cell phones where attorney-client privilege in their contents was asserted because the father was communicating with expert witnesses in his case. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Privileges, Standing, Stop and frisk, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH11: No standing in father’s cell phones even when communicating with defense experts

Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom by Josh Gerstein (“The action against James O’Keefe has prompted concern about the Biden administration’s commitment to the First Amendment.”) Is O’Keefe a “journalist” or not? He … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on Politico: FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

WA: HIPAA violation in seizing medical records by SW required their return

The trial court’s order denying return of patient records taken by search warrant from the petitioner youth services provider failed to comply with HIPAA requirements should have been granted. While the records have been returned and the case is otherwise … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on WA: HIPAA violation in seizing medical records by SW required their return

CA9: Use of def’s suppression hearing testimony in penalty phase not unreasonable application of Simmons

The California Supreme Court’s holding that Simmons did not bar using defendant’s suppression hearing testimony in the death penalty phase of his criminal trial (People v. Ochoa, 19 Cal. 4th 353, 79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 408, 966 P.2d 442, 464, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Privileges, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA9: Use of def’s suppression hearing testimony in penalty phase not unreasonable application of Simmons

IN: Privilege against self-incrimination is not self-executing as to cell phone password disclosure

Defendant’s mid-trial motion to suppress a cell phone search was waived: It was not timely, and defendant consented to giving the passcode and gave consent to search it. The privilege against self-incrimination is not self-executing here. Kerner v. State, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Search | Comments Off on IN: Privilege against self-incrimination is not self-executing as to cell phone password disclosure

CA11: Govt filter team for review of seized materials not per se unreasonable; stringent protocol followed

The use of a government filter time to review seized materials implicating the attorney-client privilege is not per se unreasonable. The USMJ ordered compliance with a more stringent protocol than approved in other cases. Injunction denied. In re Sealed Search … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Govt filter team for review of seized materials not per se unreasonable; stringent protocol followed

CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

Property lawfully seized by the city is destroyed or sold after a short while if unclaimed. That doesn’t make it an unreasonable seizure or a taking. Conyers v. City of Chicago, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24676 (7th Cir. Aug. 18, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

The New Mexico regulatory scheme for truck inspections has already been held to satisfy Burger. Stopping defendants’ truck for inspection at an inspection station was reasonable under that standard. On opening the trailer to compare to the bills of lading, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

CA7: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply in suppression hearings

The confrontation clause does not apply in suppression hearings. United States v. Bebris, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 20974 (7th Cir. July 15, 2021). The apartment’s search warrant was for evidence of drug sales from it. Those found there at the … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA7: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply in suppression hearings

Reason: Cops Say Encryption Hinders Investigations. These Documents Say Otherwise.

Reason: Cops Say Encryption Hinders Investigations. These Documents Say Otherwise. by J.D. Tuccille (“Law enforcers have plenty of tools; they just want to paw through our data without effort or expense.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Privileges | Comments Off on Reason: Cops Say Encryption Hinders Investigations. These Documents Say Otherwise.

Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case

Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case by Tim Cushing. The government filed this pleading.

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case

Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr

Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr, 134 Harv. L. Rev. 905 (2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr

Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode?

Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode? by Robert J. Anello & Richard F. Albert (“When law enforcement seeks to compel a subject to provide a passcode to allow them to rummage through a cellphone, courts have … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode?

WaPo: Giuliani’s legal profession does not shield him from seizure of electronics, prosecutors say

WaPo: Giuliani’s legal profession does not shield him from seizure of electronics, prosecutors say by Shayna Jacobs (“Rudolph W. Giuliani, the onetime personal attorney to former president Donald Trump, cannot claim his profession should have shielded him from the search … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on WaPo: Giuliani’s legal profession does not shield him from seizure of electronics, prosecutors say

WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

Where the stop exceeded reasonableness, the district court’s finding it was de minimus was error. It was less than the time for the dog sniff, but the dog had time to arrive. Mahaffy v. State, 2021 Wyo. LEXIS 71 (May … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel giving passcode to def’s cell phone at AUSA’s request wasn’t consent; merely avoiding delay of decryption

An AUSA’s request of defense counsel for defendant’s cell phone’s passcode was not a request for consent. It was merely to avoid the delay of decryption. United States v. Mangini, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66764 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 6, 2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel giving passcode to def’s cell phone at AUSA’s request wasn’t consent; merely avoiding delay of decryption