Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

NY Co.: SW for cell phone without time limitation was unreasonable

One search warrant for searching defendant’s phone with Cellebrite was without time limitation and was overbroad. People v. Gonzalez, 2022 NY Slip Op 22074, 2022 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 928 (N.Y.Co. Mar. 7, 2022). Defendant claimed his jail calls after 48 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on NY Co.: SW for cell phone without time limitation was unreasonable

D.Mass.: Pretrial inmate mail was subject to search even though inmate handbook didn’t discuss it

While the pretrial inmate handbook didn’t say that outgoing mail was subject to inspection, the Supreme Court held in Stroud in 1919 that such searches were reasonable. And this one was too. United States v. Polanco, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Excessive force, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Pretrial inmate mail was subject to search even though inmate handbook didn’t discuss it

NY Co.: Failure to execute SW in ten days voids it

The search warrant wasn’t executed within 10 days as required by statute where it had to be returned to the court if not. Suppressed. People v. Tonner, 2022 NY Slip Op 50175(U), 2022 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 833 (N.Y. Co. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Protective sweep, Strip search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY Co.: Failure to execute SW in ten days voids it

E.D.Mo.: Covid delay in 48 hour McLaughlin rule not unreasonable

A 12 hour delay past the 48 hour McLaughlin rule for a finding of probable cause was not shown to be unreasonable because of Covid delays and the temporary shutdown of the St. Louis federal courthouse for cleaning. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Prison and jail searches, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Covid delay in 48 hour McLaughlin rule not unreasonable

C.D.Ill.: Jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the 4A for recording telephone calls

A jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the Fourth Amendment for recording telephone calls. An alleged violation of the Illinois wiretapping statute is not a constitutional violation. Hunt v. Securus Techs., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26452 (C.D.Ill. Feb. 15, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the 4A for recording telephone calls

CA10: Tasing a fleeing suspect is the seizure

Defendant continued to flee when he was finally Tasered. Then he was seized. United States v. Jeffers, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 3131 (10th Cir. Feb. 3, 2022). Plaintiff complains that inmate porters came into his prison cell and went through … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Tasing a fleeing suspect is the seizure

W.D.Ky.: Confiscation of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not a 4A

“Because it is the First and Fourteenth Amendment, and not the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure that protects against the reading and confiscation of legal mail by prison officials, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Confiscation of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not a 4A

E.D.Mich.: No standing to claim knock-and-announce violation of another’s house

Plaintiff has no standing to complain of a knock-and-announce violation of another person. “Here, Plaintiff does not even claim that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in McMullen’s house. But even if he did make such a claim, the … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No standing to claim knock-and-announce violation of another’s house

OH10: No REP in possession of a stolen laptop that sent its location information

Appellant’s motion to reopen his appeal to reargue his Fourth Amendment claims is denied. Not one thing he proffers can change the outcome of the appeal. There was a basis for a GPS warrant on his vehicle, and there was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on OH10: No REP in possession of a stolen laptop that sent its location information

MI: No REP in overheard jail conversations between cells recorded through intercoms

Defendants were in jail together, in separate cells 20′ apart (#1 & #4) and talking about their case through the doors’ openings. Jailers could overhear them. “When jail personnel noticed that defendants were communicating with each other by speaking loudly … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on MI: No REP in overheard jail conversations between cells recorded through intercoms

D.Nev.: Private prison’s recording of attorney-client calls states a claim

A criminal defense lawyer stated a claim against a private prison operator under the wiretapping laws for recording attorney-client calls. Bliss v. Corecivic, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10953 (D.Nev. Jan. 18, 2022). 2254 petitioner’s illegal search claim barred by Stone. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Private search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Private prison’s recording of attorney-client calls states a claim

CA9: Public electric utility cutting off one’s power is not a 4A seizure

The public electric utility cutting off one’s power is not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Lull v. County of Sacramento, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1408 (9th Cir. Jan. 19, 2022). There was probable cause on the totality, including a showing of … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Public electric utility cutting off one’s power is not a 4A seizure

N.D.Okla.: Cross designated tribal officer could obtain state SW then used in federal court

A Cherokee Nation officer was cross-deputized to act for the “City of Tulsa, the State of Oklahoma, the United States, and the Cherokee Nation.” “Second, the Supreme Court has found that reviewing courts should give ‘great deference’ to a magistrate’s … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Cross designated tribal officer could obtain state SW then used in federal court

NY Kings Co.: Police led def to believe call from interrogation room was private

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his telephone call from a precinct interrogation room from being recorded. While there is a diminished expectation of privacy in an interrogation room, there was no warning what happened in the room … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Police led def to believe call from interrogation room was private

Vice: Prison Phone Companies Are Recording Attorney-Client Calls Across the US

Vice: Prison Phone Companies Are Recording Attorney-Client Calls Across the US (“Lawyers say their conversations with incarcerated people are being recorded and analyzed by private companies in at least nine US states.”)

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on Vice: Prison Phone Companies Are Recording Attorney-Client Calls Across the US

W.D.N.Y.: For Stone, the federal courts don’t second-guess the state court’s 4A decisions

“While those facts do not necessarily compel the conclusion that the warrantless search of the garbage tote was justified by the emergency exception, that is not the question before me. As stated, it is not this Court’s function to second-guess … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: For Stone, the federal courts don’t second-guess the state court’s 4A decisions

CA3: Coast Guard needs only RS to board a vessel to inspect the Oil Record Book about pollution

The Coast Guard had the authority under 14 U.S.C. § 522(a) to conduct a pollution inspection of defendant’s vessel and look at the Oil Record Book. “The Coast Guard’s preliminary examination of the Oil Record Book and Oily Water Separator … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA3: Coast Guard needs only RS to board a vessel to inspect the Oil Record Book about pollution

MS: No REP in contraband cell phone in prison

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a contraband cell phone in prison. United States v. Jackson, 866 F.3d 982 (8th Cir. 2017). Walker v. State, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 502 (Dec. 7, 2021). Accord: United States v. Basaldua, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on MS: No REP in contraband cell phone in prison

TN: No standing in text messages on codef’s cell phone

Defense counsel could not be ineffective for not moving to suppress text messages on the codefendant’s cell phone where defendant had no standing. Wells v. State, 2021 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 553 (Dec. 7, 2021). There is no reasonable expectation … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on TN: No standing in text messages on codef’s cell phone

NY4: Minor typos in SW application don’t void the warrant

“We reject defendant’s contention that the search warrant for his cell phones was issued without probable cause. According ‘great deference to the issuing [Justice]’ …, we conclude that Supreme Court properly determined that there was sufficient information in the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY4: Minor typos in SW application don’t void the warrant