D.Nev.: Private prison’s recording of attorney-client calls states a claim

A criminal defense lawyer stated a claim against a private prison operator under the wiretapping laws for recording attorney-client calls. Bliss v. Corecivic, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10953 (D.Nev. Jan. 18, 2022).

2254 petitioner’s illegal search claim barred by Stone. His attempt to amend it to turn it into an ineffective assistance of counsel claim fails, too. Anthony v. S.C. Dep’t of Prob., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251148 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2021).*

A private search led to information in the search warrant application for child pornography. Therefore, the warrant was based on reasonable searches. United States v. Eley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10387 (D.Nev. Jan. 20, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Private search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.