NY Co.: SW for cell phone without time limitation was unreasonable

One search warrant for searching defendant’s phone with Cellebrite was without time limitation and was overbroad. People v. Gonzalez, 2022 NY Slip Op 22074, 2022 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 928 (N.Y.Co. Mar. 7, 2022).

Defendant claimed his jail calls after 48 hours of detention right after arrest should be suppressed. Since the detention itself wasn’t unreasonable, recording the calls was not error. United States v. Anderson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48201 (D.Md. Mar. 17, 2022).

The trial court’s order indefinitely retaining contemnor’s cell phone for allegedly recording in court was unreasonable. In re Gipson, 2022-Ohio-853, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 774 (1st Dist. Mar. 18, 2022); In re Sullivan, 2022-Ohio-852, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 772 (1st Dist. Mar. 18, 2022).

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.