Author Archives: Hall

D.S.C.: No standing in suitcase on def’s back porch he wouldn’t claim

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the search of a suitcase on the back porch of his house that he didn’t claim ownership of. United States v. Lane, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227893 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2024).* Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No standing in suitcase on def’s back porch he wouldn’t claim

N.D.Iowa: Govt’s exigency claim to enter defendant’s garage is rejected

“To the extent defendants assert that the warrantless entry was necessary to continue a purported temporary detention of Wheelock to further their investigation, that is not a recognized exigency or exception to justify a warrantless entry into a home or … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Govt’s exigency claim to enter defendant’s garage is rejected

OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

The evidentiary foundation for Facebook messages under rule 901 was established by the officer obtaining the Facebook warrant. State v. Lathon, 2024-Ohio-5886, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4539 (10th Dist. Dec. 18, 2024). Officers had neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

OH10: Suicidal domestic call followed by ShotSpotter alert was RS

Police had a call about a domestic situation with a suicidal man with a gun. Shortly thereafter, there was a ShotSpotter alert of 20 gunshots from a house nearby. Officers arrived and patted down those found there. This is substantially … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Suicidal domestic call followed by ShotSpotter alert was RS

CA5: A complete investigation before a SW application is sought isn’t required

A search warrant application isn’t defective because the officers didn’t do a more complete investigation. The constitution doesn’t require that. Miller v. Salvaggio, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 31833 (5th Cir. Dec. 16, 2024):

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA5: A complete investigation before a SW application is sought isn’t required

DE: PO’s failure to comply with juvenile probation search regulations on parental involvement justified suppression

The state’s policy on parental involvement in juvenile probation searches wasn’t complied with, and the juvenile’s home search is suppressed. The state’s assertion of exigency is rejected. Sharp v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 412 (Dec. 16, 2024). The court won’t … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE: PO’s failure to comply with juvenile probation search regulations on parental involvement justified suppression

OH3: Going right into pockets was an invalid frisk

The state failed to prove the necessity for a stop and frisk because the video shows the officer going right into defendant’s pockets and not frisking. State v. Barnes, 2024-Ohio-5865, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4519 (3d Dist. Dec. 16, 2024). … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH3: Going right into pockets was an invalid frisk

POGO: Federal Acquisition of Commercially Available Information

Project on Government Oversight: Federal Acquisition of Commercially Available Information by Don Bell (pdf)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on POGO: Federal Acquisition of Commercially Available Information

CA6: Pending state court action was place to bring 4A claim under Younger

A state court action was going on involving plaintiff and his wetlands in Michigan, and he was enjoined from certain things. After state inspectors took soil and water samples, he sued in federal court. Younger abstention applies, and the state … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6: Pending state court action was place to bring 4A claim under Younger

Today is Bill of Rights Day

Fourth Amendment, established December 15, 1791.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Today is Bill of Rights Day

E.D.Mo.: It was settled over 50 years ago that an officer could surreptitiously record a face-to-face conversation

“Bolden’s entire focus is on recordings between himself and an undercover federal agent who was outfitted with a covert recording device. The government is correct-Bolden’s argument is foreclosed by long-standing caselaw.” As in 1971. United States v. Bolden, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: It was settled over 50 years ago that an officer could surreptitiously record a face-to-face conversation

E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

A successor habeas can’t be based on allegedly withheld evidence of a Fourth Amendment violation. Sanchez v. Cates, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226067 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2024). Defendant can’t show that defense counsel was ineffective for not moving to … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

S.D.Fla.: Def showed enough for a Franks violation with reckless false material fact

A misstated fact in the search warrant affidavit was material to probable cause because there was so much other stuff. United States v. Ibanez-Molina, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225948 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 25, 2024)*:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Def showed enough for a Franks violation with reckless false material fact

OH8: Failure to attempt to distinguish contrary settled cases is waiver of argument

“In similar situations to the second transaction, federal courts have upheld the validity of the warrant to search a drug dealer’s premises based on the ‘common sense’ inference that drugs would be found in the home, essentially finding that evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on OH8: Failure to attempt to distinguish contrary settled cases is waiver of argument

NYTimes: Mount Vernon Police’s Strip Searches Were Unconstitutional, U.S. Says

NYTimes: Mount Vernon Police’s Strip Searches Were Unconstitutional, U.S. Says by Alyce McFadden (”A report by federal prosecutors found that a Westchester County police department violated the Fourth Amendment ‘on an enormous scale.’ [¶] Two women, 65 and 75 years … Continue reading →

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on NYTimes: Mount Vernon Police’s Strip Searches Were Unconstitutional, U.S. Says

Reason: Kindle Version of “The Digital Fourth Amendment” Is Now Available

Reason: Kindle Version of “The Digital Fourth Amendment” Is Now Available by Orin S. Kerr (“You have to wait until January for the physical book, but you can read the electronic version now. … I’m very pleased to say that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: Kindle Version of “The Digital Fourth Amendment” Is Now Available

NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

Just because defendant was a suspected drug dealer, there wasn’t probable cause for searching his cell phone. “While [officer] Bruno recounted that there was a quantity of drugs found in the motel room, along with the two phones, he did … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

W.D.La.: Dog sniff at door of commercial rented storage unit violated no REP

A dog sniff at the door to a rented commercial storage unit violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Harris, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224506 (W.D. La. Nov. 4, 2024). There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Dog sniff at door of commercial rented storage unit violated no REP

AR: LA judge could issue SW for LA medical records for AR crime

After an accident in South Arkansas, defendant was airlifted to a hospital in Shreveport, Louisiana. A search warrant in Louisiana was issued for his medical records. There was no requirement that an Arkansas judge issue a warrant first, just so … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Conflict of laws, Good faith exception, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: LA judge could issue SW for LA medical records for AR crime

S.D.N.Y.: No stay of execution of a computer and cell phone SW after def was indicted

Defendant was arrested in Malaysia and a computer and cell phones were seized. He was then indicted in NYC. The nine-day delay in getting a warrant was not unreasonable considering defendant was in custody and unable to use them. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No stay of execution of a computer and cell phone SW after def was indicted