CA6: Pending state court action was place to bring 4A claim under Younger

A state court action was going on involving plaintiff and his wetlands in Michigan, and he was enjoined from certain things. After state inspectors took soil and water samples, he sued in federal court. Younger abstention applies, and the state court presumably can handle these issues, so the district court properly dismissed. Satkowiak v. McClain, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 31728 (6th Cir. Dec. 12, 2024).

An anonymous tip that people in camouflage clothing came out of the bush and got in a car near the border was about enough for reasonable suspicion. United States v. Martin, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225758 (D. Ariz. Dec. 13, 2024).*

The trial court erred in ordering return of a stolen car 20 years later without more proof of who the owner was. State v. Hadley, 2024 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 145 (Dec. 13, 2024).*

The court won’t apply the Fourth Amendment reasonable expectation of privacy standard to an email discovery dispute over attorney-client privilege. Flannery Assocs., LLC v. Barnes Family Ranch Assocs., LLC, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226127 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.