Author Archives: Hall

AZ: The drug courier profile has its place in supporting RS, but it doesn’t have any place at trial

Drug courier profile evidence has its place (“Drug-courier profile evidence suggests that a defendant possesses one or more behavioral characteristics typically displayed by persons trafficking in illegal drugs. See State v. Haskie, 242 Ariz. 582, 585 ¶ 14, 399 P.3d … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AZ: The drug courier profile has its place in supporting RS, but it doesn’t have any place at trial

FL1: Possessor of USB drives who acquired them trading for drugs had apparent authority to consent

Defendant’s vehicle had been burglarized and USB drives were also stolen. The police report omitted them. Later, another guy acquired the USB drives when he was buying drugs. When he was busted, he turned them over to the police telling … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on FL1: Possessor of USB drives who acquired them trading for drugs had apparent authority to consent

CA10: You can’t tell the court it needs to apply the independent source case law a certain way and then complain on appeal that it did what you asked

This case started with hotel housekeeping coming in to clean a room and seeing obvious drug paraphernalia. The police were called, and they were shown. A search warrant was prepared showing probable cause to connect defendants to the room by … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Independent source, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA10: You can’t tell the court it needs to apply the independent source case law a certain way and then complain on appeal that it did what you asked

S.D.N.Y.: “Particularity is not to be confused with breadth — they are ‘related but distinct concepts.’”

A broad Facebook warrant for electronically stored information was not unconstitutionally overbroad. “Particularity is not to be confused with breadth — they are ‘related but distinct concepts.’” A Facebook warrant can be issued in New York and served on Facebook’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: “Particularity is not to be confused with breadth — they are ‘related but distinct concepts.’”

D.Idaho: RS for continuing a traffic stop can be based on a violation of probation conditions

Reasonable suspicion for continuing a traffic stop can be based on a violation of probation conditions, as was this one. United States v. Durr, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157472 (D. Idaho Sep 15, 2018). Petition for writ of error coram … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Idaho: RS for continuing a traffic stop can be based on a violation of probation conditions

OH5: Stop became unreasonable where officer extended stop 13 minutes and never started on ticket for failure to signal

The trial court suppressed because the stop was overly extended. Defendant was stopped for alleged failure to signal, and it dragged on for 13 minutes without the officer ever starting on writing a ticket. Conceding the stop was likely valid, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH5: Stop became unreasonable where officer extended stop 13 minutes and never started on ticket for failure to signal

NE: Reliance on pre-Birchfield law meant GFE applied

The officer’s objective reliance on pre-Birchfield law meant the good faith exception applied. State v. Nielsen, 301 Neb. 88, 2018 Neb. LEXIS 158 (Sep 15, 2018). Pre-Carpenter CSLI by SCA order without probable cause was the law prior to Carpenter, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on NE: Reliance on pre-Birchfield law meant GFE applied

D.N.M.: Def parked car near his house but left it in gear with the key in the ignition; it was not abandoned

Defendant did not abandon his car. He parked it at his house and went inside. His dog was still inside. The entry into his car was reasonable under the community caretaking function because it was left in gear, and a … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Staleness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def parked car near his house but left it in gear with the key in the ignition; it was not abandoned

NE: Shots fired at car led to officers seeing likely kicked in door and blood on doormat and that was exigency

Officers responded to a call about shots fired hitting a car, and, at defendant’s apartment building, defendant and his cohort fled when the police approached. Possible blood was found on his doormat, and the door had a boot mark that … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NE: Shots fired at car led to officers seeing likely kicked in door and blood on doormat and that was exigency

MA: Violation of a state regulation leading to identifying def juvenile doesn’t warrant suppression

Alleged violation of a state regulation that led to defendant juvenile’s identity didn’t warrant suppression. Suppression would require the statute align with a constitutional requirement. Moreover, there was no police misconduct; indeed, the police did good work here in locating … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MA: Violation of a state regulation leading to identifying def juvenile doesn’t warrant suppression

OH8: Hard to show prejudice for IAC on not raising a motion to suppress until mid-trial

Defense counsel didn’t file a motion to suppress because she didn’t see a reason for it until testimony at trial revealed the issue. Therefore, the defense made a mid-trial motion to suppress. The trial court denied it on two grounds: … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Hard to show prejudice for IAC on not raising a motion to suppress until mid-trial

IL: Not error for court to decline to continue suppression hearing for what would have been merely cumulative evidence having no affect on outcome

It was not error to deny a continuance in a suppression hearing after it started because one officer was unavailable due to a death in the family. The defense didn’t even know what he would testify to when asked, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on IL: Not error for court to decline to continue suppression hearing for what would have been merely cumulative evidence having no affect on outcome

CA11: Tasering elderly man suffering a severe hypoglycemic episode five times and while trying to comply was excessive

“Mr. Glasscox, [an apparently elderly man] who lives with Type 1 diabetes, suffered a severe hypoglycemic episode while driving his pickup truck on Interstate 59 South near the City of Argo, Alabama. His condition caused him to begin driving erratically. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Tasering elderly man suffering a severe hypoglycemic episode five times and while trying to comply was excessive

S.D.Fla.: The FTC sought an order of production of cell phones and laptops for search in an action for injunction; production not testimonial and PC shown

The FTC sued defendants for injunctive relief and sought an order for production of cell phones and laptop computers. On the first issue of preservation of the Fourth Amendment claim in addition to the clearly asserted Fifth Amendment, the court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: The FTC sought an order of production of cell phones and laptops for search in an action for injunction; production not testimonial and PC shown

CA5: 2 am knock-and-talk that led to alleged consent and excessive force claim gets no QI

2 a.m. knock and talk may have been unreasonable, and summary judgment for officers is reversed. Plaintiff closed her door and they insisted upon entry. The officers were investigating whether plaintiff’s son committed trespass that night. Plaintiff also stated a … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, Nighttime search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: 2 am knock-and-talk that led to alleged consent and excessive force claim gets no QI

CA9: No articulable facts could be given for exigent based entry into apt; “lack of information is the opposite of articulable facts.”

There was no objectively reasonable basis for an emergency entry into defendant’s apartment because the police said that somebody might need immediate assistance. Defendant grabbed his waistband when running, but no gun was ever seen. “[L]ack of information is the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: No articulable facts could be given for exigent based entry into apt; “lack of information is the opposite of articulable facts.”

IL: Unambiguous traffic statute wasn’t subject to Heien good faith mistake argument

The traffic statute defendant was alleged to have violated was unambiguous, and the court finds defendant didn’t violate it. Therefore, there can be no reasonable good faith reliance on the statute to salvage the stop. People v. Walker, 2018 IL … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Unambiguous traffic statute wasn’t subject to Heien good faith mistake argument

M.D.La.: Typo in the address of the place to be searched not fatal where officers surveilled it before

There was an error in the address on the search warrant, but it’s clear to the court that there was no likelihood that the wrong apartment would be searched because the officers had surveilled it. There was reasonable suspicion for … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Typo in the address of the place to be searched not fatal where officers surveilled it before

OR: Failure to appeal order denying return of property precludes later relief

Defendant’s denial of his motion for return of property was a final appealable order, and his failure to appeal foreclosed later recovery. State v. Fenton, 294 Ore. App. 48, 2018 Ore. App. LEXIS 1091 (Sep. 13, 2018). Defense counsel made … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OR: Failure to appeal order denying return of property precludes later relief

LA4: When state fails to get a SW for def’s medical records, it doesn’t get a do over to fix it

In State v. Skinner, 10 So.3d 1212 (La. 2009), the state supreme court held that there was a state constitutional warrant requirement for defendant’s medical records. Failing to do it right can’t be cured by a later warrant after it’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges, Staleness, State constitution | Comments Off on LA4: When state fails to get a SW for def’s medical records, it doesn’t get a do over to fix it