NE: Shots fired at car led to officers seeing likely kicked in door and blood on doormat and that was exigency

Officers responded to a call about shots fired hitting a car, and, at defendant’s apartment building, defendant and his cohort fled when the police approached. Possible blood was found on his doormat, and the door had a boot mark that looked like it had been kicked in. The entry was reasonable to look for possible victims. State v. Castellanos, 26 Neb. App. 310, 2018 Neb. App. LEXIS 222 (Sep. 13, 2018).

North Dakota amended its implied consent statute after Birchfield, but the way it was presented to the defendant here was misleading so it is suppressed. Schoon v. N.D. DOT, 2018 ND 210 (Sep 15, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.