Defendant’s denial of his motion for return of property was a final appealable order, and his failure to appeal foreclosed later recovery. State v. Fenton, 294 Ore. App. 48, 2018 Ore. App. LEXIS 1091 (Sep. 13, 2018).
Defense counsel made the best suppression argument he could based on what he had at the time. Defendant can’t show that the outcome would be different if it had been approached differently. State v. Ortiz, 2018 Del. Super. LEXIS 387 (Sep. 12, 2018).*
The record supports the finding of consent. People v. Xochimitl, 2018 NY Slip Op 06053, 2018 N.Y. LEXIS 2585 (Sep. 13, 2018) (memorandum).*