Author Archives: Hall

CA5: Tapping a vehicle tire was a trespass but with RS and was reasonable on the totality

The tapping of a suspicious looking tire on a truck was a trespass under Jones and other cases, but the court finds it was with reasonable suspicion and reasonable on the totality. The tapping of the tire revealed that it … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search, Trespass | Comments Off on CA5: Tapping a vehicle tire was a trespass but with RS and was reasonable on the totality

N.D.Cal.: No RS for stop for alleged street deals based on CI

The officers’ claimed reasonable suspicion of street drug deals in San Francisco’s Tenderloin District just doesn’t add up to it on the totality of circumstances. The CI wasn’t adequately corroborated. The stop and frisk fails. United States v. Castaneda, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: No RS for stop for alleged street deals based on CI

CA8: Lesser intrusive measures to inventory not constitutionally required

The inventory was appropriately conducted within the policy of the department. Defendant had no constitutional right to have somebody come to pick up the car before inventory. The police could do that if convenient, but they weren’t required to do … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CA8: Lesser intrusive measures to inventory not constitutionally required

CA11: § 1983 malicious prosecution claim defeated by PC even though exonerating information omitted from arrest affidavit

Plaintiff police officers’ false arrest claim fails on qualified immunity. Even though allegedly exonerating information was omitted from the arrest affidavits, and the criminal case was dropped by the state’s attorney, it wasn’t enough to undermine the probable cause that … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: § 1983 malicious prosecution claim defeated by PC even though exonerating information omitted from arrest affidavit

KS: Inadequate findings and conclusions must be brought to trial court’s attention before appeal

Defendant should have objected to the adequacy of findings of fact and conclusions of law on his search issue in the trial court first. “Without such an objection, this court must presume the district court found all the facts needed … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on KS: Inadequate findings and conclusions must be brought to trial court’s attention before appeal

S.D.N.Y.: Destruction of surveillance cameras before search not a “seizure” or due process violation

The government destroyed defendant’s surveillance cameras as a part of the search just before it started. He asserts a Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment due process claim as a result. The court finds no authority that disabling the cameras was … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Destruction of surveillance cameras before search not a “seizure” or due process violation

Law & Crime: North Carolina Sheriffs Clash With ICE Officials After Series of Unwanted Immigration Raids

Law & Crime: North Carolina Sheriffs Clash With ICE Officials After Series of Unwanted Immigration Raids by Colin Kalmbacher:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Law & Crime: North Carolina Sheriffs Clash With ICE Officials After Series of Unwanted Immigration Raids

N.D.Okla.: “firearms are tangible objects of habitual retention” and that overcomes def’s staleness argument

“Officer Campbell averred that, based on her experience and training, she knows that firearms are tangible objects of habitual retention, and once a person acquires a firearm, he or she usually keeps said weapon for a long period of time.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: “firearms are tangible objects of habitual retention” and that overcomes def’s staleness argument

D.D.C.: Protective order issued to keep def from seeing body camera videos in discovery

There were several body camera videos relating to this case as well as the search and seizure. The issue here is the scope of a protective order to keep defendant from seeing. The government met its burden of showing good … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Cell site location information, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Protective order issued to keep def from seeing body camera videos in discovery

WA: State attenuation is more narrow than the 4A’s, and here it wasn’t satisfied

The attenuation doctrine applies under the Washington Constitution, but it is more narrowly applied than the Fourth Amendment’s. Here is it not satisfied, and there are no intervening circumstances. State v. Mayfield, 2019 Wash. LEXIS 70 (Feb. 7, 2019):

Posted in Attenuation, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: State attenuation is more narrow than the 4A’s, and here it wasn’t satisfied

W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for trial strategy def had nothing to do with house, which denies him standing to contest search

Defendant disavowed any connection at trial to a particular house as a trial strategy. Thus, it was not ineffective assistance of counsel for not moving to suppress the search of a house he thus lacked standing in–defendant would not have … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No IAC for trial strategy def had nothing to do with house, which denies him standing to contest search

S.D.N.Y. concludes there is a somewhat limited common law right of access to the SW materials in the Michael Cohen case

On the motion of media organizations’ for access to the search warrant materials in the Michael Cohen case, the S.D.N.Y. concludes there is a limited common law right of access to the search warrant materials. Contrary to other courts, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y. concludes there is a somewhat limited common law right of access to the SW materials in the Michael Cohen case

CA6: Officers who went to hospital room get QI on whether there was a REP in the shared room

Officers who visited plaintiff in his hospital room he shared with another were sued for allegedly violating his reasonable expectation of privacy. There is no clear controlling authority, and the officers get qualified immunity [and the issue goes undecided]. Bonds … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Officers who went to hospital room get QI on whether there was a REP in the shared room

CA7: QI barred § 1983 over forced prison blood draw

Plaintiff is an inmate in prison who was ordered to give a blood test when prison officials decided he wasn’t acting right and might be high. His suit over the prison’s forced blood draw is barred by qualified immunity. Holm … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: QI barred § 1983 over forced prison blood draw

CA9: Ptf’s affidavit there was no announcement before battering ram broke in her door makes her civil case survive summary judgment

Plaintiff showed enough of a fact question that officers never announced they were attempting to enter on a search warrant, breaking in her door, to survive their motion for summary judgment. They said, she said. Greiner v. Wall, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Knock and announce | Comments Off on CA9: Ptf’s affidavit there was no announcement before battering ram broke in her door makes her civil case survive summary judgment

DE: Untimely motion to suppress properly denied; def would lose on the merits anyway

Failure to file a motion to suppress before trial constituted a waiver of claims regarding the admissibility of items found at defendant’s garage. There was no plain error in the application of the inevitable discovery rule because it was clear … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Untimely motion to suppress properly denied; def would lose on the merits anyway

IA: Def’s consent to patdown for weapons wasn’t consent to open container that could not have contained a weapon

Defendant consented to a patdown for weapons. Removing an object and opening it that couldn’t be holding a weapon exceeded the consent. State v. Hampton, 2019 Iowa App. LEXIS 108 (Feb. 6, 2019). The evidence the police gathered showed that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IA: Def’s consent to patdown for weapons wasn’t consent to open container that could not have contained a weapon

NY2: SW for person and house didn’t permit search of cars out front

The search warrant was for defendant’s person and his house. The police also searched two cars on the premises. The court finds the cars outside the warrant and suppresses them. People v. Gordon, 2019 NY Slip Op 00901, 2019 N.Y. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Overseizure | Comments Off on NY2: SW for person and house didn’t permit search of cars out front

D.Utah: Heck barred § 1983 case over his search which produced only evidence in case

Essentially the only evidence supporting defendant’s conviction came from his search and seizure of evidence. Thus, his § 1983 case over the search is barred by Heck. Anderson v. Houston, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19246 (D.Utah Feb. 5, 2019).* For … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on D.Utah: Heck barred § 1983 case over his search which produced only evidence in case

Cal.4th: Use of cell site simulator with SW was reasonable

The use of a cell site simulator with a search warrant to locate defendant’s cell phone was reasonable. The issue on appeal was whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to continue while the defense tried … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Cal.4th: Use of cell site simulator with SW was reasonable