D.Utah: Heck barred § 1983 case over his search which produced only evidence in case

Essentially the only evidence supporting defendant’s conviction came from his search and seizure of evidence. Thus, his § 1983 case over the search is barred by Heck. Anderson v. Houston, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19246 (D.Utah Feb. 5, 2019).*

For the third time now (Presley v. United States, 895 F.3d 1284 (11th Cir. 2018); BMP Family Ltd. P’ship v. United States, 741 Fed. Appx. 764 (11th Cir. 2018)), an IRS summons to a law firm was valid and enforceable under the Fourth Amendment. The law firm can’t use this appeal to resurrect a defaulted issue. Presley & Presley P.A. v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3526 (11th Cir. Feb. 5, 2019).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.