Author Archives: Hall

TX8 sustains geofence warrant

TX8, El Paso without much discussion sustains a geofence warrant. Also the warrants for the phone and social media accounts were issued with probable cause and were particular. Alvarez v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 6106 (Tex. App. – El … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, geofence, Social media warrants | Comments Off on TX8 sustains geofence warrant

CA8: Running when asked about a gun was RS

“Running in response to the question about the gun is what gave the officers reasonable suspicion to think he might have one.” Then he tossed his gun “while tussling with officers.” United States v. Chumley, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20497 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA8: Running when asked about a gun was RS

W.D.N.Y.: No exigency shown for warrantless domestic entry

Based on the complaint, there were no exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry into the home for a domestic disturbance that had calmed way down before police got there. Intertwined is the qualified immunity claim, and there’s not enough here … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No exigency shown for warrantless domestic entry

N.D.Ill.: A mistake on the address was made up for by other detail; no Franks violation

“To the extent the lack of an address lessens a warrant’s particularity, the other information more than makes up for it. … In this case, Walters highlights one factual error: No glass door bearing the numbers ‘13624’ existed when the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: A mistake on the address was made up for by other detail; no Franks violation

S.D.W.Va.: RS determined at the time of stop, not by what found after

A “black man with a waving a gun” did not justify defendant’s stop. When officers arrived, he was just there. No gun visible or apparent. Reasonable suspicion is determined at the time, not after the fact. United States v. Wilder, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: RS determined at the time of stop, not by what found after

D.C.Cir.: Pole camera not governed by mosaic theory

Pole camera surveillance of a resident was reasonable and the mosaic theory did not apply. United States v. Green, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20410 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 12, 2025):

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Pole camera not governed by mosaic theory

Latin Times: Trump Administration Pushes to Use Spanish Language as Grounds for Immigration Stops

Latin Times: Trump Administration Pushes to Use Spanish Language as Grounds for Immigration Stops in California by Pedro Camacho (“The administration argued that agents should be able to rely on these indicators when enforcing immigration laws.”) I had an associate … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Latin Times: Trump Administration Pushes to Use Spanish Language as Grounds for Immigration Stops

MI: Two controlled buys where def left house to do it and returned was PC for house

The informant’s information here [to me] was conclusorily stated by the officer to be reliable [not discussed], except there were also two controlled buys from the defendant where he left his place and returned. [The latter is enough.] People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on MI: Two controlled buys where def left house to do it and returned was PC for house

Four on IAC claims

Appellant doesn’t get a CoA on his claim he could have appealed the denial of the suppression motion despite the guilty plea. United States v. Penton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20172 (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025).* “Thus, Loston’s claim fails … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Four on IAC claims

SCOTUSBlog: Trump administration urges Supreme Court to block district court ruling preventing immigration stops

Amy Howe: Trump administration urges Supreme Court to block district court ruling preventing immigration stops (SCOTUSBlog Aug. 7), Noem v. Perdomo, 25A169. The stay application is here. The response is due August 12th, 5 pm. Note: This is an application … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Trump administration urges Supreme Court to block district court ruling preventing immigration stops

CA11: SW for 15 years worth of records was still particular

The warrant for records was particular, albeit for 15 years worth of bank records, but it matched the time period under investigation, 1/1/05-11/11/19. And the good faith exception applies. United States v. Gyetvay, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20080 (11th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: SW for 15 years worth of records was still particular

OH2: State didn’t support basis for stop; remanded

Poorly developed record by the state results in remand. The state didn’t support its basis for the stop. State v. Scerba, 2025-Ohio-2791 (2d Dist. Aug. 8, 2025). Remember, in warrantless searches, the prosecution carries the burden of proof:

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on OH2: State didn’t support basis for stop; remanded

TX7: Odor of MJ is PC; that’s TX precedent, and out of state cases don’t carry any weight

The odor of cannabis is still probable cause in Texas. “Emerging case law” in other states doesn’t matter because of Texas precedent. Parras v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5954 (Tex. App. – Amarillo Aug. 8, 2025). Defendant had no … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on TX7: Odor of MJ is PC; that’s TX precedent, and out of state cases don’t carry any weight

CNS: Office manager of Kansas newspaper raided by police settles lawsuit with town

CNS: Office manager of Kansas newspaper raided by police settles lawsuit with town by Hilled Aron (“The office manager of the Marion County Record, a Kansas weekly newspaper whose offices were raided by police, has settled her lawsuit with the … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CNS: Office manager of Kansas newspaper raided by police settles lawsuit with town

CA7: Omission of snitch’s criminal history wasn’t material compared to the detail

Omission of the CI’s criminal history and that he was already in trouble with the law wasn’t material here for Franks purposes. The detail overcame it. United States v. Hecke, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19836 (7th Cir. Aug. 6, 2025):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: Omission of snitch’s criminal history wasn’t material compared to the detail

NC: Nine-day delay between shooting and SW for gun wasn’t stale

A nine-day delay between a shooting and the search warrant for defendant’s place to look for the weapon wasn’t stale. The standard for timeliness is simply common sense. State v. Stevens, 2025 N.C. App. LEXIS 489 (Aug. 6, 2025).* A … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on NC: Nine-day delay between shooting and SW for gun wasn’t stale

E.D.N.C.: Not asking for hearing on motion to suppress not IAC

2255 petitioner faults his lawyer for not asking for a hearing on his motion to suppress, which lost, but he doesn’t show that it mattered. Moreover, this is really just taking a shot at recharacterizing the motion to suppress, but … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Not asking for hearing on motion to suppress not IAC

UT: State’s use of federal administrative subpoena to gather records for state sex crime does not require suppression

Getting the feds to administratively subpoena records for a sex offense involving a minor allegedly in violation of the Utah Electronic or Data Privacy Act (EIDPA) didn’t require suppression. State v. Andrus, 2025 UT 32 (Aug. 7, 2025):

Posted in Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on UT: State’s use of federal administrative subpoena to gather records for state sex crime does not require suppression

CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door in a multi-unit complex didn’t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. (Two unpublished cases in this circuit said that; this one’s published.) United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19648 (4th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

CA5: “Fill in the blanks” arrest affidavit still showed PC

The “fill in the blanks” arrest affidavit for the Waco Twin Peaks biker shootout wasn’t fatally defective. What facts it had showed probable cause. Barnhart v. Stroman, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19740 (5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2025). Based on a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: “Fill in the blanks” arrest affidavit still showed PC