Author Archives: Hall

CA11: Def had no standing in a borrowed car he was a passenger in and the search was of the pocket of the driver’s door

“For starters, Black did not have standing to challenge the September 9, 2016, search of the car he was borrowing, and, thus, could not have prevented the fraudulent credit cards within it from entering evidence. The record shows that, at … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Def had no standing in a borrowed car he was a passenger in and the search was of the pocket of the driver’s door

MA: Probation search of cell phone photo app was reasonable; could be used in a subsequent prosecution

Defendant’s probation search of a photo app on his cell phone that revealed child pornography and led to a search warrant of his residence was reasonable. The product of all the searches was admissible against him in a subsequent criminal … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MA: Probation search of cell phone photo app was reasonable; could be used in a subsequent prosecution

gizmodo: Feds Find Fourth Amendment Workaround, Buy Phone Locations From Marketing Firms

gizmodo: Feds Find Fourth Amendment Workaround, Buy Phone Locations From Marketing Firms by Dell Cameron (“Sidestepping the need to obtain a search warrant, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reportedly been accessing phone location data belonging to millions of … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on gizmodo: Feds Find Fourth Amendment Workaround, Buy Phone Locations From Marketing Firms

E.D.Mich.: No ex ante opportunity for email account holder to challenge SW

Targets of an email search warrant lack standing to challenge the search warrant ex ante, before execution. They must do so after. In the Matter of the Search of Records, Information, and Data Associated with 14 Email Addresses Controlled by … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No ex ante opportunity for email account holder to challenge SW

D.Minn.: Exercising control over cell phone to shield it from being seen by police was showing a subjective REP, right up until def denied it was his

Defendant first sought to shield the cell phone in his hand from view. When the police finally got it from him, he denied it was his. “Through his conduct at the time of the seizure, Mayer arguably exhibited a subjective … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Exercising control over cell phone to shield it from being seen by police was showing a subjective REP, right up until def denied it was his

N.D.Iowa: Search of defendant’s entire Facebook account was overbroad for lack of temporal limitations

Search of defendant’s entire Facebook account was overbroad for lack of temporal limitations. United States v. Burkhow, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20319 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 6, 2020):

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Search of defendant’s entire Facebook account was overbroad for lack of temporal limitations

TX14: It was clearly established standing on an arrestee’s face was excessive; here, causation for death not shown

“We conclude that controlling authority’ or ‘a robust “consensus of cases of persuasive authority”’ as of September 2010 make it sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would understand (as did those who testified) that stepping on the nose and mouth … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on TX14: It was clearly established standing on an arrestee’s face was excessive; here, causation for death not shown

FL1: Leon’s “so lacking in indicia of probable cause” doesn’t seek to determine whether PC actually exists; it’s whether it is conclusory and “bare bones”

Leon’s “so lacking in indicia of probable cause” doesn’t seek to determine whether probable cause actually exists. It’s whether the affidavit is so conclusory it is “bare bones.” Wingate v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on FL1: Leon’s “so lacking in indicia of probable cause” doesn’t seek to determine whether PC actually exists; it’s whether it is conclusory and “bare bones”

CA5: When USMJ’s findings are based on PC and GFE, def must appeal both or be subject to plain error, and here it’s not

When the USMJ rules on both probable cause and the good faith exception, the objections have to go to both. Here, defendant only objected to the probable cause finding and not the application of the good faith exception, so the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA5: When USMJ’s findings are based on PC and GFE, def must appeal both or be subject to plain error, and here it’s not

D.Mass.: Def’s car was towed and inventoried, but searching his backpack was unreasonable when he wasn’t arrested

Defendant’s vehicle was being towed because he was an unlicensed driver, and he wasn’t being arrested. He could accompany the vehicle. The officer inventoried the car and then searched his backpack. The backpack search wasn’t reasonable because he wasn’t being … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def’s car was towed and inventoried, but searching his backpack was unreasonable when he wasn’t arrested

S.D.Fla.: Radio report of a gun brought police to def, and his furtive movement was then RS

Stop and frisk was with reasonable suspicion. “Having received a radio communication that Defendant appeared to be armed and having observed Defendant reaching toward his waist in a manner consistent with reaching towards an area of the body where individuals … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Radio report of a gun brought police to def, and his furtive movement was then RS

CA3: Civil contempt for failing to provide password to computers and other devices for search was limited to 18 months

Petitioner has been held for three years for civil contempt for failure to provide encryption data for his computer and other devices so they could be searched under a warrant. The punishment for civil contempt can’t exceed the life of … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA3: Civil contempt for failing to provide password to computers and other devices for search was limited to 18 months

CA4: 4A doesn’t require a particular statement of the crime under investigation if it otherwise adequately describes the place to be search or the person or thing to be seized

“More fundamentally, we think that the premise of Blakeney’s argument — that a search warrant always must specify the crime for which the executing officers may seek evidence – is mistaken. The Fourth Amendment ‘specifies only two matters that must … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: 4A doesn’t require a particular statement of the crime under investigation if it otherwise adequately describes the place to be search or the person or thing to be seized

OH8: Trial strategy was that the drugs weren’t def’s; a motion to suppress would have to argue standing; no IAC

Pursuing a motion to suppress would have been contrary to trial strategy that it wasn’t his stuff. “In overruling the first assignment of error, on ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to move to suppress, this court noted that … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on OH8: Trial strategy was that the drugs weren’t def’s; a motion to suppress would have to argue standing; no IAC

S.D.Ga.: Search incident of def’s room on his arrest was valid even though he’d just been removed

The search incident of defendant’s room was valid because it occurred shortly after his arrest when he was still there, despite his being handcuffed which doesn’t per se make a search incident invalid. “Because defendant failed to allege facts which, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Search incident of def’s room on his arrest was valid even though he’d just been removed

CA9: When arresting a vehicle passenger on a felony warrant, a frisk of others in the car is permissible for officer safety

When executing a felony arrest warrant on an occupant of a car, frisking companions in the car is reasonable for officer safety. United States v. Abbassi, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3575 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2020). “In her informal brief … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: When arresting a vehicle passenger on a felony warrant, a frisk of others in the car is permissible for officer safety

S.D.N.Y.: Brendlin standing of a passenger to challenge a stop doesn’t translate into standing to also challenge the search

Brendlin standing of a passenger to challenge a stop doesn’t translate into standing to also challenge the search. Defendant still has to show a reasonable expectation of privacy in the vehicle. “The Defendant attempts to establish standing by arguing that, … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Brendlin standing of a passenger to challenge a stop doesn’t translate into standing to also challenge the search

OH8: No IAC for not arguing prior authority should be overruled

Appellate counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that a prior decision should be overruled when it would not likely be. State v. Newton, 2020-Ohio-376, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 340 (8th Dist. Jan. 30, 2020).* Defendant’s claims of deficient performance were … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: No IAC for not arguing prior authority should be overruled

S.D.W.Va.: No REP in pole camera observations of who came and went from def’s front door

Pole camera observations from the street ended up in a wiretap application. Carpenter provides no relief. The only observations were the comings and goings from the house for which there was no reasonable expectation of privacy. “Because the Defendant has … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Pole cameras | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: No REP in pole camera observations of who came and went from def’s front door

IA: Trash container on the alley not on his property; no REP

A trash seizure [remember those?] was of trash on an alley awaiting pick up. There was no entry on the curtilage or his reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Wright, 2020 Iowa App. LEXIS 151 (Feb. 5, 2020). The officer’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Trash container on the alley not on his property; no REP