Author Archives: Hall

CA5: 10 am knock-and-talk didn’t violate Jardines

Officers who came to defendant’s door at 10 am and asked for permission to use a dog to sniff his yard didn’t violate Jardines. United States v. Flores, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10235 (5th Cir. Apr. 1, 2020). “The present … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: 10 am knock-and-talk didn’t violate Jardines

CA6: Asking about drugs in car during normal incidents of stop not unreasonable under Rodriguez

Defendant’s admission he possessed marijuana in his car was within the normal incidents of the traffic stop, Therefore, the officer could extend the stop under Rodriguez. United States v. Lott, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10237 (6th Cir. Apr. 1, 2020). … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Asking about drugs in car during normal incidents of stop not unreasonable under Rodriguez

OR: Asking about drugs in car during an “unavoidable lull” in traffic stop was unreasonable under state constitution

Asking about drugs in the car during an “unavoidable lull” in the stop was unreasonable under the state constitution under Arreola-Botello. State v. McBride, 303 Ore. App. 292, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS 433 (Apr. 1, 2020), on remand from 366 … Continue reading →

Posted in State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Asking about drugs in car during an “unavoidable lull” in traffic stop was unreasonable under state constitution

IA: Def’s association with known drug dealers without any nexus to his own house isn’t PC

“Although we decide marginal cases in favor of upholding warrants, we cannot rubber stamp the authorization to search a home unsupported by probable cause. Here, the search warrant application established Higgins’s association with people who used or delivered controlled substances. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Def’s association with known drug dealers without any nexus to his own house isn’t PC

CNN: How the cell phones of spring breakers who flouted coronavirus warnings were tracked

CNN: How the cell phones of spring breakers who flouted coronavirus warnings were tracked by Donie O’Sullivan:

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNN: How the cell phones of spring breakers who flouted coronavirus warnings were tracked

CA11: Generic state 4A post-conviction petition with no citation of authority waived state claims

A generic state claim for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance in counsel of a Fourth Amendment claim that cited nothing was no claim at all, and didn’t toll § 2254 limitations. “Dunn’s September 2015 motion merely asserted that her convictions … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Generic state 4A post-conviction petition with no citation of authority waived state claims

D.Haw.: Def failed in her motion to reconsider overseizure by failure to specify exactly what was

Defendant’s motion to suppress was previously denied, but she was allowed to specify what documents were overseized. “[T]he court will consider a motion to suppress specific documents or other evidence based on proof that such items were seized and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Def failed in her motion to reconsider overseizure by failure to specify exactly what was

D.Minn.: “A police officer’s ‘characterization is not enough, standing alone, to implicate Fourth Amendment protections.’” That’s the court’s duty

“A police officer’s ‘characterization is not enough, standing alone, to implicate Fourth Amendment protections.’ Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 574, 108 S. Ct. 1975, 100 L. Ed. 2d 565 (1988). The parties’ characterization of the events notwithstanding, the Court … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “A police officer’s ‘characterization is not enough, standing alone, to implicate Fourth Amendment protections.’” That’s the court’s duty

IL: Pill bottle wasn’t a weapon, and removing it from pocket in a weapons frisk was unreasonable

The officer stopped after he believed defendant shouted an obscenity at him. When the officer looked at defendant, he spit in the officer’s direction. The patdown thereafter was without reasonable suspicion. The removal of a round cylindrical object from his … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Pill bottle wasn’t a weapon, and removing it from pocket in a weapons frisk was unreasonable

S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

A search warrant to search an apartment and seize computers and cell phones includes the power to search them later. United States v. Quinonez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55789 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2020). The officer’s statement that the CI’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

VT AG: Attorney General’s Directive to Law Enforcement on the Enforcement of the COVID-19 Emergency Order

VT AG: Attorney General’s Directive to Law Enforcement on the Enforcement of the COVID-19 Emergency Order: The Executive Order 01-20 does not authorize road closure or the establishment of roadblocks, checkpoints or the authority to demand identification. You will continue … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on VT AG: Attorney General’s Directive to Law Enforcement on the Enforcement of the COVID-19 Emergency Order

Corporate Counsel: Microsoft Chief Legal Officer Applauds Washington’s Recently Signed Facial Recognition Law

Corporate Counsel: Microsoft Chief Legal Officer Applauds Washington’s Recently Signed Facial Recognition Law by Dan Clark (“Washington’s new law shows how regulation and market forces can move forward together in a way that advances innovation to meet public needs,” Brad … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Corporate Counsel: Microsoft Chief Legal Officer Applauds Washington’s Recently Signed Facial Recognition Law

The Intercept: Privacy Experts Say Responsible Coronavirus Surveillance is Possible

The Intercept: Privacy Experts Say Responsible Coronavirus Surveillance is Possible by Sam Biddle (“In less than a decade, whistleblowers like the NSA’s Edward Snowden and Cambridge Analytica’s Christopher Wylie helped spur a global sea change in the public’s attitude toward … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: Privacy Experts Say Responsible Coronavirus Surveillance is Possible

PA: Calling police to report burglary and theft of firearms was invitation to come to house and he let them in

Calling the police to report a burglary and theft of firearms was an invitation for them to come to the house, then he invited them in. This was implied consent to enter. Commonwealth v. Fredrick, 2020 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on PA: Calling police to report burglary and theft of firearms was invitation to come to house and he let them in

W.D.N.Y.: SW for telephone records not required instead of a subpoena

Defendant was entitled to a search warrant rather than a search warrant to obtain his telephone records. United States v. McClain, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55427 (W.D. N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020). The search warrant application for child pornography wasn’t at … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Staleness, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW for telephone records not required instead of a subpoena

CA11: No REP in a police interview room where def was recorded confessing to his wife

There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in a police interview room where defendant was recorded confessing to his wife. Lundberg v. Secretary, Fla. Dep’t of Correction, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9953 (11th Cir. Mar. 31, 2020). Police received a … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: No REP in a police interview room where def was recorded confessing to his wife

TX5: SW for blood didn’t have to say it could be tested, too; why else was it drawn?

A search warrant for a blood sample doesn’t have to say that it could be tested, too. Otherwise, why draw it at all. Common sense dictates it would be. Suppression order reversed. State v. Staton, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 2610 … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Pretext | Comments Off on TX5: SW for blood didn’t have to say it could be tested, too; why else was it drawn?

OH9: Medical records allegedly unlawfully seized weren’t in appellate record, so prejudice couldn’t be determined; held waived

Defendant claimed his medical records were unlawfully seized and admitted at evidence as an admission at this DUI trial. Without them in the appellate record, the appellate court can’t determine prejudice. Thus, this is waived. State v. Miller, 2020-Ohio-1209, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH9: Medical records allegedly unlawfully seized weren’t in appellate record, so prejudice couldn’t be determined; held waived

CA10: Def’s prior drug arrests by the officer contributed to RS when in a high crime area and other things

“Serna was ‘seized’ under the Fourth Amendment through a Terry stop when Sergeant Silva told Serna to keep his hands where he could see them, and Serna placed his hands on top of his head. … The district court ruled … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s prior drug arrests by the officer contributed to RS when in a high crime area and other things

E.D.Wis.: IAC shown for failure to move to suppress arrest in own home

Defendant satisfied his burden of showing ineffective assistance of counsel for defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that the entry into the house violated the Fourth Amendment and this tainted defendant’s consent. There is no strategic reason … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: IAC shown for failure to move to suppress arrest in own home