Author Archives: Hall

CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds. Benson v. Chappell, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14035 (9th Cir. May 1, 2020). There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, but the officer’s opening the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search | Comments Off on CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

CA6: It is settled that tenants have a REP in an interior hallway open only to them

The district court erred in granting qualified immunity to the officers who entered a hallway that was associated with only one apartment that decedent clearly had a reasonable expectation of privacy in. The law is settled in this circuit. Decedent … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: It is settled that tenants have a REP in an interior hallway open only to them

D.Ariz.: Overseizure of emails by SW didn’t require suppression of all; GFE also applies

This search warrant was issued in a SSA fraud case alleging a decade of false claims. The search warrant was sufficiently particular and not overbroad. The fact the period of the alleged offense was through January 2014 did not prohibit … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Overseizure of emails by SW didn’t require suppression of all; GFE also applies

M.D.Pa.: Strip search at DTF office was reasonable on PC def hid drugs in underwear and anal cavity

Officers had probable cause defendant had drugs hidden in his underwear or anal cavity. When he was taken to the DTF office, a strip search there was reasonable when there were no drugs otherwise in his possession. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Strip search at DTF office was reasonable on PC def hid drugs in underwear and anal cavity

AZ: Successfully controverting PC for SW requires return of copies of digital evidence

Defendant in a criminal case was suspected of Arizona wildlife offenses, and the state procured a search warrant. He successful controverted the warrant for lack of probable cause under state statute. Digital copies of evidence were kept by the state. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on AZ: Successfully controverting PC for SW requires return of copies of digital evidence

bizjournals.com: Aerial surveillance planes to begin flying over Baltimore Friday

bizjournals.com: Aerial surveillance planes to begin flying over Baltimore Friday by Ethan McLeod (“Camera-equipped surveillance planes will take to the Baltimore skies Friday, kicking off a six-month pilot program testing the technology’s ability to help fight crime. … Ohio-based Persistent … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on bizjournals.com: Aerial surveillance planes to begin flying over Baltimore Friday

VA: Patdown for firearm was unreasonable where no crime was afoot even though it was apparent def was carrying

Armed officers calling out to defendant “Yo, turn around, you live here?” was a seizure, he attempted to ignore until they caught up with him. He was patted down because of a telltale L-shaped bulge, and a gun removed. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on VA: Patdown for firearm was unreasonable where no crime was afoot even though it was apparent def was carrying

E.D.Tenn.: Pill bottle in bedroom is not subject to plain view because incriminating nature not immediately apparent

A pill bottle on top of a dresser wasn’t subject to plain view because its incriminating nature wasn’t immediately apparent. United States v. Crawford, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74440 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 6, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73477 … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Pill bottle in bedroom is not subject to plain view because incriminating nature not immediately apparent

FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

Defendant was stopped for sitting in a park with his bicycle after hours, a violation of a county ordinance. The search incident of his backpack for this offense violated the Florida Constitution. Booker v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 5718 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

EFF: The Dangers of COVID-19 Surveillance Proposals to the Future of Protest

EFF: The Dangers of COVID-19 Surveillance Proposals to the Future of Protest by Matthew Guariglia (“Many of the new surveillance powers now sought by the government to address the COVID-19 crisis would harm our First Amendment rights for years to … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: The Dangers of COVID-19 Surveillance Proposals to the Future of Protest

D.S.D.: Forced catheterization of drug suspects with SW merely to see if drugs are in their system was unreasonable

Forced catheterization of drug suspects with a search warrant, who refused to urinate on demand, because of suspicion of drug use was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment under Schmerber. The individual defendants get qualified immunity, however, because of a lack … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Forced catheterization of drug suspects with SW merely to see if drugs are in their system was unreasonable

MO: Radio report of def being potentially armed and dangerous plus unusually cluttered car justified protective weapons search

Defendant was stopped for expired tags. The officer noticed the inside of the vehicle was unusually cluttered. He got the DL and went back to his patrol car to call it in. “After the report came back that Lindsay was … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on MO: Radio report of def being potentially armed and dangerous plus unusually cluttered car justified protective weapons search

D.Mont.: Search incident for violation of no-contact order unjustified

The USMJ’s order is affirmed. The motion to suppress the search warrant is denied because there was probable cause. The search incident for evidence of violation of a no-contact order was properly ordered suppressed. United States v. Watson, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Search incident, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Search incident for violation of no-contact order unjustified

CA7: When PC for a SW is the issue, the affidavit is the sole thing to be reviewed on appeal, not the govt’s summary for district court

The government provided the district court a three page summary of the 17 page affidavit for search warrant. Defendant argues that the summary was more inculpatory than the affidavit itself. This is beyond the standard of review because it’s the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA7: When PC for a SW is the issue, the affidavit is the sole thing to be reviewed on appeal, not the govt’s summary for district court

D.N.J.: Protective sweep of house after arrest outside was unjustified; it was a search for a gun

Defendant’s arrest outside his house near his front door did not justify a protective sweep of his house. “Indeed, this Court finds that the marshals’ broad search of the Westberry residence was conducted specifically to find the firearm. … Because … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Protective sweep of house after arrest outside was unjustified; it was a search for a gun

CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

Officers responded to a medical emergency at the entryway of defendant’s house. They ended up conducting a protective sweep for which there was no justification whatsoever. The firearm found in the protective sweep is suppressed. United States v. Gonzalez-Martin, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

GA: Arrest for sex offense wasn’t PC to believe digital storage device on person had evidence; SW suppressed

Defendant was arrested for aggravated child molestation and aggravated sodomy, and he had a digital storage device on him. Police sought a search warrant for the storage device, but the affidavit failed to show any probable cause to believe evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: Arrest for sex offense wasn’t PC to believe digital storage device on person had evidence; SW suppressed

CA8: Extraditee stated Bell v. Wolfish due process claim from injury and degradation from 8 day transportation that should have taken about 17 hours

Plaintiff was an extraditee transported from Colorado to Mississippi, a 17 hour trip, that took eight days and resulted in real injury and degradation from lack of stops and rest. Plaintiff sued in the Eastern District of California, but it … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8: Extraditee stated Bell v. Wolfish due process claim from injury and degradation from 8 day transportation that should have taken about 17 hours

CA8: District court’s findings of voluntary consent supported by record despite language barrier and defense language expert

Despite a language barrier and a Spanish-language expert saying the officer’s request was ambiguous, the district court found that defendant consented to a search of his luggage. That finding is not clearly erroneous, even considering all the record. The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA8: District court’s findings of voluntary consent supported by record despite language barrier and defense language expert

AR: Drug dog at scene while warning ticket being written didn’t extend stop

This dog sniff did not extend the stop where the dog arrived while the warning ticket was being written. Mickens v. State, 2020 Ark. App. 280, 2020 Ark. App. LEXIS 307 (Apr. 29, 2020). The blood draw of the unconscious … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Drug dog at scene while warning ticket being written didn’t extend stop