Author Archives: Hall

CA9: Bulge in clothing from a firearm justifies a stop-and-frisk in California

A bulge that appears to be a firearm justifies a stop-and-frisk in jurisdictions where concealing a weapon is presumptively a crime, here, California. United States v. Bontemps, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 32227 (9th Cir. Oct. 13, 2020):

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: Bulge in clothing from a firearm justifies a stop-and-frisk in California

MT: Private actor recording conversation on own didn’t violate state constitution

The Montana Constitution’s more “robust protection from government intrusions” still only protects against state action. A private actor recording a conversation without impetus from the state was not unreasonable. State v. Wolfe, 2020 MT 260, 2020 Mont. LEXIS 2436 (Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Private search, State constitution | Comments Off on MT: Private actor recording conversation on own didn’t violate state constitution

VA: Knock-and-talk is still a valid exception for entry onto the curtilage

While entry into the curtilage is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant, Collins v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 1663, 1670 (2018), there is still implied license for police to enter for a knock-and-talk. Saal v. Commonwealth, 2020 Va. App. LEXIS 241 … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Knock-and-talk is still a valid exception for entry onto the curtilage

CA2: CIs don’t need “a track record of reliability” when shown otherwise reliable

The CI was described in the affidavit for the warrant as “reliable,” but didn’t elaborate. “Circuit precedent does not require informants to have a track record of reliability. … Here, where the informant testified under oath before the issuing judge … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA2: CIs don’t need “a track record of reliability” when shown otherwise reliable

D.C.Cir.: Alleged seizure of open fields not a 4A claim, but it is a 5A claim

The North American Butterfly Association sued the federal government over a part of the Mexican border wall on their butterfly preserve being Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims. Their Fourth Amendment claim is dismissed because it involves alleged seizure of open … Continue reading →

Posted in Open fields, Seizure | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Alleged seizure of open fields not a 4A claim, but it is a 5A claim

SCOTUS: Torres v. Madrid argued today

Torres v. Madrid, 19-292: Issue: Whether an unsuccessful attempt to detain a suspect by use of physical force is a “seizure” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 8th, 9th and 11th … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS, Seizure | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Torres v. Madrid argued today

The Intercept: Stop-and-frisk Never Really Ended. Now It’s Gone Digital.

The Intercept: Stop-and-frisk Never Really Ended. Now It’s Gone Digital. by Alice Speri (“A federal class-action lawsuit accuses New York police of unconstitutionally detaining people in order to run their IDs.”) If the stop has to be based on reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on The Intercept: Stop-and-frisk Never Really Ended. Now It’s Gone Digital.

AF: Franks violation led to exclusion

Defendant showed a Franks violation for a reckless statement for a search authorization of his room for marijuana. Balancing the interests, the exclusionary rule would be applied. United States v. Hernandez, 2020 CCA LEXIS 362 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on AF: Franks violation led to exclusion

FL4: SW of def’s cell phone authenticated text messages

After a search warrant produced defendant’s text messages, the state was able to authenticate them by the phone. State v. Torres, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 14356 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 7, 2020). “In addition, ‘[d]uring a valid traffic stop, officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on FL4: SW of def’s cell phone authenticated text messages

N.D.Ill.: Def had standing to challenge search of a garage of another he was using and had exclusive control over at the time

“Perez has provided enough evidence to show that, at the time of the search, he had control over the Dakin garage and the ability to exclude others from it. He was storing materials there, there was no one else on … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Def had standing to challenge search of a garage of another he was using and had exclusive control over at the time

CA9: No standing to sue to enjoin future border searches of cell phones

Plaintiff cannot obtain prospective injunctive relief against future border cell phone searches because he lacks standing for future searches. As to past searches, he cannot obtain injunctive relief after suing under the FTCA. “Under FTCA’s judgment bar, ‘once a plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: No standing to sue to enjoin future border searches of cell phones

KS: Legality of a stop may be pursued before DMV in a DL suspension

The legality of a stop may be pursued before DMV in a DL suspension. Jarvis v. Kan. Dep’t of Revenue, 2020 Kan. LEXIS 97 (Oct. 9, 2020). The trial court barred relitigating defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim on collateral estoppel grounds. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Waiver | Comments Off on KS: Legality of a stop may be pursued before DMV in a DL suspension

KY: Affidavit for the SW limited the breadth of cell phone warrant

While the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was arguably overbroad and not well drafted, it was limited by the affidavit in support as to the specific things to be sought. Tucker v. Commonwealth, 2020 Ky. App. LEXIS 112 (Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth | Comments Off on KY: Affidavit for the SW limited the breadth of cell phone warrant

D.Mass.: Def had no REP in his employer’s information he was accused of taking

Defendant is charged with accessing and taking his employer’s information for the purpose of setting up a rival company doing the same thing. His motion to suppress the information is denied because he has no reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def had no REP in his employer’s information he was accused of taking

OH2: Officer’s claim he didn’t know whether def’s bag had a gun was unparticularized and applied to everybody

DTF officers entered a Greyhound bus heading to Detroit to question passengers. Defendant’s stop on the bus and then the frisk of his bag lacked reasonable suspicion. The fact there had been drug couriers on the bus before didn’t mean … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Officer’s claim he didn’t know whether def’s bag had a gun was unparticularized and applied to everybody

CA10: Def’s flight into house to avoid arrest justified police entry because of exigency and hot pursuit

Police initiated arresting defendant outside his home, and he fled into his house to avoid it. The warrantless entry into his home was justified by probable cause for the arrest and exigent circumstances of both destruction of evidence and hot … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s flight into house to avoid arrest justified police entry because of exigency and hot pursuit

CA11: Carpenter doesn’t require SW for prescription drug monitoring program records

In this pill mill case, Carpenter provides no protection for third party records and information in the Florida Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). United States v. Gayden, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 32030 (11th Cir. Oct. 9, 2020):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA11: Carpenter doesn’t require SW for prescription drug monitoring program records

E.D.Wis.: RS of carrying drugs described

“In the context of this case [and the totality of circumstances], the question before the court is whether Trooper Callister unreasonably prolonged his stop of Martinez. I conclude he did not. That the initial stop was justified is without dispute. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: RS of carrying drugs described

CA5: Failure to plead facts in motion to suppress that would justify relief doesn’t require a hearing

The district court didn’t abuse its discretion in denying the motion to suppress without a hearing for failure to plead “facts that would justify relief.” United States v. Smith, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 32024 (5th Cir. Oct. 8, 2020):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA5: Failure to plead facts in motion to suppress that would justify relief doesn’t require a hearing

OH8: Stop justified by running LPN and seeing it was suspended; RS not required to check it

“Here, while Officer Mackensen had no reasonable suspicion that Long was involved in criminal activity before he checked Long’s vehicle’s license plate, he was permitted to do so pursuant to the case law authority. And, once he learned the license … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH8: Stop justified by running LPN and seeing it was suspended; RS not required to check it