Author Archives: Hall

SCOTUS cert. grant: Does hot pursuit apply to misdemeanant’s flight into own home?

Lange v. California, 20-18 (granted Oct. 19, 2020): Issue: Whether the pursuit of a person whom a police officer has probable cause to believe has committed a misdemeanor categorically qualifies as an exigent circumstance sufficient to allow the officer to … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit | Comments Off on SCOTUS cert. grant: Does hot pursuit apply to misdemeanant’s flight into own home?

SCOTUS: three dissent from denial of cert.: Jardines requires reversal

Bovat v. Vermont, 2020 U.S. LEXIS 5057 (Oct. 19, 2020) (Gorsuch dissenting from denial of certiorari with Sotomayor and Kagan):

Posted in Curtilage, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: three dissent from denial of cert.: Jardines requires reversal

GA: Where state constitution or statute are recognized to be susceptible to a broader interpretation than the 4A, appellant has to show why or how; otherwise, it’s waived

Defendant also relies on the state constitution as well as statute in addition to the Fourth Amendment. “However, Hinkson makes no argument that state law provides a rule substantively different as applied to this case from that of the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, State constitution | Comments Off on GA: Where state constitution or statute are recognized to be susceptible to a broader interpretation than the 4A, appellant has to show why or how; otherwise, it’s waived

CT: Pretrial GPS monitoring didn’t violate right to counsel and is 4A reasonable

Pretrial GPS monitoring that can tell when the accused is at his attorney’s office doesn’t violate the right to counsel, and it’s reasonable when merely monitoring whether defendant is abiding by her pretrial travel restrictions. State v. Troconis, 2020 Conn. … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Privileges | Comments Off on CT: Pretrial GPS monitoring didn’t violate right to counsel and is 4A reasonable

AP: Baltimore prosecutor: Do not authorize “no knock” warrants

AP: Baltimore prosecutor: Do not authorize “no knock” warrants (“Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby has directed prosecutors in her office to not authorize ‘no knock’ arrest warrants that are approved by judges, citing the police shooting death of Breonna Taylor … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on AP: Baltimore prosecutor: Do not authorize “no knock” warrants

N.D.Ala.: Def failed to prove he was an overnight guest with standing

Defendant lacked standing where he purported to be an overnight guest, but the host said no. United States v. Spencer, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191102 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 4, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190308 (N.D. Ala. Oct. 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Def failed to prove he was an overnight guest with standing

D.S.D.: Issuing magistrate shown not to be neutral and detached in issuing SW wholly lacking in PC

A tribal judge was not a neutral and detached magistrate, and the good faith exception did not apply. The application for the search warrant was technically deficient in both form (lacking a prosecutor’s signature) and substance (completely lacking probable cause), … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Issuing magistrate shown not to be neutral and detached in issuing SW wholly lacking in PC

N.D.Ga.: Reissuance of a better SW to Google after a motion to suppress wasn’t unreasonable

As to one challenged search of Google, when the government says it won’t use challenged evidence at trial, the motion to suppress becomes moot. A motion to suppress another search warrant to Google led to reissuance of a search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Independent source, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Reissuance of a better SW to Google after a motion to suppress wasn’t unreasonable

AR: Video of arrest wasn’t claimed below to be a const’l claim, so it’s waived

Defendant sought to suppress the video of his arrest where he held a knife to his throat but he cited nothing for the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment, but he did cite Rule 403. The state argued it was evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Video of arrest wasn’t claimed below to be a const’l claim, so it’s waived

S.D.N.Y.: ShotSpotter alert from a rooftop led to encounter then RS

A ShotSpotter report was specific as to a shot coming from a rooftop in the Bronx. That house was the subject of many police calls. This led to defendants being encountered by officers who discussed with them what was going … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: ShotSpotter alert from a rooftop led to encounter then RS

S.D.N.Y. follows majority and holds that a cell phone search starts with “seizure of the media”

The government had possession of defendant’s cell phone and technically started the search within the time limits of Rule 41(e)(2)(B) by “seizure of the media.” The extraction report followed up months later. United States v. Estime, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y. follows majority and holds that a cell phone search starts with “seizure of the media”

M.D.Pa.: Photographs of interior of house taken before SW issued are suppressed

Photographs of the interior of defendant’s house taken before the search warrant issued are suppressed. They did not have any effect on the issuance of the warrant, however. United States v. Carey, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190963 (M.D. Pa. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Photographs of interior of house taken before SW issued are suppressed

TX1: Driving offenses can be an indication of RS by showing avoidance of being stopped

Driving offenses can be indicators of drug trafficking and avoidance. “Therefore, based on the information he received from Captain Garrett related to appellant’s involvement in possible narcotics trafficking, combined with his observations of appellant driving on the shoulder, we conclude … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on TX1: Driving offenses can be an indication of RS by showing avoidance of being stopped

WY: Stop was factually justified even if pretextual

“Despite the stop of the Tacoma being pretextual due to information provided by Agent Ford, Trooper Hobbs based the initial traffic stop upon a personally witnessed violation of the law. Thus, [Mr. Simmons’] rights under both the Wyoming Constitution and … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Pretext | Comments Off on WY: Stop was factually justified even if pretextual

GA: Even if GPS tracker was unconstitutionally placed, it didn’t affect later SW for vehicle

Defendant first claimed the vehicle was his when the officer asked, and he consented to a search of it. After a few loose rounds of ammunition were found, he disavowed ownership. It turned out there was also a tracking device … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Independent source, Standing, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on GA: Even if GPS tracker was unconstitutionally placed, it didn’t affect later SW for vehicle

CA8: Negative patdown didn’t remove threat when ptf reached for waistband and was shot

Plaintiff was patted down (it appears more of a full search incident) and then fled and reached for his waistband and was shot. A gun was overlooked in the patdown. “We therefore conclude that Officer Ashcraft is entitled to summary … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Negative patdown didn’t remove threat when ptf reached for waistband and was shot

LawPracticeCLE: Evidence Seized with the Use of Canine Searches: A Guide for Attorneys

LawPracticeCLE: Evidence Seized with the Use of Canine Searches: A Guide for Attorneys (Oct. 27, 2020)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LawPracticeCLE: Evidence Seized with the Use of Canine Searches: A Guide for Attorneys

N.D.Cal.: Officer doesn’t need RS before contacting def with a suspicionless search waiver

Defendant had a suspicionless parole search waiver, and the officer doesn’t even need cause for the encounter. United States v. Jackson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189471 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2020). The affidavit for the search warrant of defendant’s tax … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Officer doesn’t need RS before contacting def with a suspicionless search waiver

MA: CP warrant wasn’t stale where information was 7 months old and he was a collector

Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. The affidavit referred to child pornography access on the internet seven months before the search warrant was sought, and it was not stale because it was likely child pornography would be found in … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on MA: CP warrant wasn’t stale where information was 7 months old and he was a collector

MA: Def’s arrest in car with others didn’t remove safety factor of search for firearm

Defendant’s arrest didn’t remove the safety factor because there were others in the vehicle who could access a potential weapon. Therefore, the search for the weapon was reasonable. Commonwealth v. Silvelo, 2020 Mass. LEXIS 647 (Oct. 14, 2020). Defendant filed … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on MA: Def’s arrest in car with others didn’t remove safety factor of search for firearm