Author Archives: Hall

CA4: The rental search was prior to Byrd making it unreasonable; Davis good faith applies

Search of a rental car before Byrd that subsequently made it unreasonable gets the benefit of the good faith exception. United States v. Houston, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 1643 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2021). There were material omissions from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: The rental search was prior to Byrd making it unreasonable; Davis good faith applies

CA6: With PC, car can be searched on impound lot

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s car for a hidden gun while it was on the impound lot. The automobile exception or inventory applied, so no warrant was required. United States v. Nuyen, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 1608 (6th … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on CA6: With PC, car can be searched on impound lot

NY1: A prior search admissible to show knowledge and lack of mistake when entrapment is raised

Defendant was a police officer charged with engaging in drug transactions. The defense was entrapment. A prior search warrant for drugs at an aunt’s apartment was admissible [404(b)] on the entrapment claim where she was present but not charged. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on NY1: A prior search admissible to show knowledge and lack of mistake when entrapment is raised

UT: Def succeeds on claim opening car door can be a 4A search, but loses on Davis good faith reliance on prior case

Police opening the door of defendant’s car on a McDonald’s parking lot where he’d nodded off can be a search. Prior authority permitting it, State v. James, 2000 UT 80, 13 P.3d 576, is now limited. This can be a … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Trespass | Comments Off on UT: Def succeeds on claim opening car door can be a 4A search, but loses on Davis good faith reliance on prior case

AR: Wrong address on SW not fatal where affiant was executing officer and the right place was searched

The wrong address on the search warrant didn’t make the warrant unparticular where the officer applying for the search warrant observed two controlled buys there from a distance and then executed the warrant on the right place. Kellensworth v. State, … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on AR: Wrong address on SW not fatal where affiant was executing officer and the right place was searched

CA10: Gun seized during inventory called off could not be kept by police

Defendant’s car was stopped at the driveway he was pulling out of. The car was going to be impounded, but the actual owner came out and said that it was her car. The gun found during the inventory was hers, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: Gun seized during inventory called off could not be kept by police

D.Nev.: Def failing to immediately stop and drawing officers deep into a parking lot added to RS

While the question is close, “I find that Pappas had reasonable suspicion that Eddards was armed and dangerous. While performing proactive gang enforcement in an area plagued by crimes being committed in rental cars, Pappas and Nahum attempted to pull … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def failing to immediately stop and drawing officers deep into a parking lot added to RS

CA6: PC for ptf’s arrest and prosecution defeats malicious prosecution claim, despite his acquittal

“This is one of those cases. A witness told Detective Keith Roberts that her former boyfriend, Eugene Baker, and one of Baker’s friends whom she knew as ‘Desean’ had robbed and murdered a competing drug dealer. After this witness identified … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: PC for ptf’s arrest and prosecution defeats malicious prosecution claim, despite his acquittal

OH5: Def’s inordinate delay in finding car insurance card enabled reasonable dog sniff

The stop was delayed by defendant being unable to produce his proof of insurance, so the officer did not extend the stop to run a dog around the car during the wait. State v. Newman, 2021-Ohio-119, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s inordinate delay in finding car insurance card enabled reasonable dog sniff

CA3: A predicate to a 41(g) motion to return property is a prior request

“To the extent Baer complains of the Government’s failure to return his devices, his argument fails because he never sought their return. Defendants who never seek the return of the property cannot argue that delay violated the Fourth Amendment. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA3: A predicate to a 41(g) motion to return property is a prior request

MO: Computer check showing LPN expired was RS despite apparent valid sticker

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop based on a computer check of his LPN which showed it had expired. The sticker, however, showed it was current. The officer could make the stop to check whether it was counterfeit, something … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Computer check showing LPN expired was RS despite apparent valid sticker

E.D.Wash.: SW affidavit that failed to show PC on its face gets no GFE

The affidavit for the search warrant failed on its face to show probable cause for search of defendant’s house. Thus, the good faith exception doesn’t apply. United States v. Contreras-Aguilar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9661 (E.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2021). … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: SW affidavit that failed to show PC on its face gets no GFE

E.D.Tenn.: Facebook is not a government actor

Facebook is not a government actor, even if NCMEC is under the Tenth Ciruit’s Ackerman. United States v. Sykes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9580 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 19, 2021). 46 days from a child pornography download by the government to … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Protective sweep, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Facebook is not a government actor

NPR: Maryland Man Arrested After GPS Unit Allegedly Shows He Was At Capitol Riot

NPR: Maryland Man Arrested After GPS Unit Allegedly Shows He Was At Capitol Riot by Austin Austermuhle (“A Silver Spring man who prosecutors say is a professed white supremacist has been charged for illegally entering and remaining in a restricted … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPR: Maryland Man Arrested After GPS Unit Allegedly Shows He Was At Capitol Riot

D.Mass.: Calling def’s cell phone from a seized cell phone’s recent call log wasn’t a search

Dialing defendant’s cell phone from the call log of a seized cell phone was not a search. If defendant wanted his number to remain private, he should block the number or turn off the phone. United States v. Katana, 2021 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Calling def’s cell phone from a seized cell phone’s recent call log wasn’t a search

OH5: If suppression court goes off on an unaddressed issue, the parties get to respond

If the trial court in a suppression hearing goes off in another direction not raised by the parties, the parties get to respond. Here, the state was on notice. State v. Arthur, 2021-Ohio-104, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 100 (5th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: If suppression court goes off on an unaddressed issue, the parties get to respond

N.D.Ill.: Arrest warrant doesn’t permit a search on entry

Defendant’s arrest warrant permitted entry to arrest him but not to search. A protective sweep was still permitted, if justified. Here no. But the search warrant for the cell phone was not tainted by the initial illegality, and the exclusionary … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Arrest warrant doesn’t permit a search on entry

Lawfare: Online Service Providers and the Fight Against Child Exploitation: The Fourth Amendment Agency Dilemma

Lawfare: Online Service Providers and the Fight Against Child Exploitation: The Fourth Amendment Agency Dilemma by Jeff Kosseff:

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on Lawfare: Online Service Providers and the Fight Against Child Exploitation: The Fourth Amendment Agency Dilemma

CA11: Standing required for 41(g) motion for return of property

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining equitable jurisdiction under Rule 41(g) for lack of a threshold showing of standing and justiciability. United States v. Stoune, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 1178 (11th Cir. Jan. 15, 2021). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Standing required for 41(g) motion for return of property

Nothing online is anonymous; especially Zoom

There’s no Fourth Amendment issue raised here, but this is a particularly ugly child pornography case involving live child rape broadcast by Zoom. Police gathered sign-in and logs from Zoom used to share the child pornography. It was captured first … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Digital Searches | Comments Off on Nothing online is anonymous; especially Zoom