Author Archives: Hall

ND: Warrantless entry of child protective services to remove a child was unreasonable

State child services officers came to defendant’s door to take her child away. She refused and ran back into the house with officers in pursuit. This warrantless entry and a second entry to collect clothes for the child were unreasonable. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on ND: Warrantless entry of child protective services to remove a child was unreasonable

ND: While a shrug isn’t consent, mumbling, nodding, and lifting one’s hands can be

While a shrug isn’t consent, mumbling, nodding, and lifting one’s hands can be consent on the totality. The consent was a permissible extension of the encounter. State v. Stands, 2021 ND 46, 2021 N.D. LEXIS 43 (Mar. 24, 2021):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on ND: While a shrug isn’t consent, mumbling, nodding, and lifting one’s hands can be

CA4: Officers watching def on a CI’s tip saw a handshake which they surmised was a drug sale; no RS from a handshake

“In order to sustain reasonable suspicion, officers must consider the totality of the circumstances and, in doing so, must not overlook facts that tend to dispel reasonable suspicion. Here, officers relied on general information from a confidential informant; two interactions … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Officers watching def on a CI’s tip saw a handshake which they surmised was a drug sale; no RS from a handshake

FL2: Private pole camera was potentially the tort of “intrusion on seclusion”

In a fence line dispute, defendants’ posting a 25’ high pole camera watching plaintiff’s property stated a claim for intrusion on seclusion. Jackman v. Cebrink-Swartz, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 4321 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 26, 2021). So how will this … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on FL2: Private pole camera was potentially the tort of “intrusion on seclusion”

DE: Exclusionary rule not designed to prohibit extra-territorial GPS tracking with warrant

In this post-conviction case, defense counsel didn’t raise the question of extraterritorial monitoring of a warrant installed GPS device. It was installed in 2015 [post-Jones] to track defendant who was an accomplished [except for getting caught] burglar. The court doesn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Exclusionary rule not designed to prohibit extra-territorial GPS tracking with warrant

W.D.La.: Govt showed justification for protective sweep of person then car

“The firearms and drugs were found during the protective sweep of the passenger area of the vehicle. The initial stop and pat-down of Defendant were justified under Terry, and the subsequent protective sweep of the car for weapons was a … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Govt showed justification for protective sweep of person then car

CA6: Driving from home to scene of drug deal is PC and nexus for the home

“To obtain a search warrant under the Fourth Amendment, the police must have “probable cause” that the ‘place’ they seek to search contains the ‘things’ they seek to seize. U.S. Const. amend. IV. Applying this test, we have repeatedly held … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Driving from home to scene of drug deal is PC and nexus for the home

NY3: CI’s alleged false statement wasn’t enough to suppress

As to an alleged false statement by the CI, it didn’t undermine the probable cause finding. People v. Cazeau, 2021 NY Slip Op 01806, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1947 (3d Dept. Mar. 25, 2021) (nearly four years from judgment … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY3: CI’s alleged false statement wasn’t enough to suppress

E.D.Wis.: 25 min. wait for tint meter was related to stop and didn’t unreasonably extend it

A 25 minute wait for a tint meter to arrive at the scene of the stop was directly related to the purpose of the traffic stop: overtinted windows. “Johnson acknowledges that the police officers lawfully stopped him. A person who … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: 25 min. wait for tint meter was related to stop and didn’t unreasonably extend it

NY3: Issuing magistrate misstating his judicial position not reason to suppress

The issuing magistrate’s misnaming his judicial position (city judge v. acting county judge) didn’t make the search warrant void. People v. Mayhew, 2021 NY Slip Op 01807, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1924 (3d Dept. Mar. 25, 2021). A “Tag … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Issuing magistrate misstating his judicial position not reason to suppress

PA: Babysitter had no REP she wouldn’t be recorded on nanny cam

An audio recording on a nanny cam evidencing an assault on the children should not have been suppressed. The babysitter had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the home of the children she was “caring” for. “That is to say … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PA: Babysitter had no REP she wouldn’t be recorded on nanny cam

CA6: No interstate commerce nexus needed for a federal search and seizure

There is no interstate commerce predicate to a federal search and seizure. Defendant cites no authority and the court doesn’t find one. United States v. Watson, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 8564 n.3 (6th Cir. Mar. 22, 2021). Remanded a second … Continue reading →

Posted in Search, Seizure, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: No interstate commerce nexus needed for a federal search and seizure

SCOTUS: Shooting at and hitting a person fleeing is a 4A seizure: “The required corporal seizing or touching the defendant’s body … can be as readily accomplished by a bullet as by the end of a finger.”

Shooting at and hitting plaintiff with the intent to stop her flight is an attempted seizure under the Fourth Amendment. She made it 75 miles to a hospital, was airlifted back, and was arrested. (Qualified immunity is not decided here.) … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Shooting at and hitting a person fleeing is a 4A seizure: “The required corporal seizing or touching the defendant’s body … can be as readily accomplished by a bullet as by the end of a finger.”

MI: No RS for PBT; nothing about def’s demeanor or appearance suggested he was under the influence

Nothing about defendant’s appearance or demeanor, other than bloodshot eyes, suggested he was under the influence. Administration of a PBT lacked reasonable suspicion. People v. Olson, 2021 Mich. App. LEXIS 1927 (Mar. 25, 2021):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: No RS for PBT; nothing about def’s demeanor or appearance suggested he was under the influence

C.D.Cal.: The ledge outside an apartment window is not part of the curtilage

Defendant’s apartment had a box placed out on the ledge below a window visible to passersby. This was not part of the curtilage because it was visible and accessible to others. (Moreover, officers got a search warrant for it. ) … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: The ledge outside an apartment window is not part of the curtilage

CA9 & NY2: Use of force reasonable as a matter of law

“McLane’s Fourth Amendment claim. The government had a strong interest in the use of force given that McLane (1) was suspected of having committed several serious and dangerous crimes, (2) could reasonably have been thought to pose an immediate threat … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9 & NY2: Use of force reasonable as a matter of law

CA9: CP SW affidavit didn’t have to exclude possibility of IP spoofing to show PC

Affiant didn’t have to exclude the possibility of IP spoofing in a child pornography case search warrant request to show probable cause . Moreover, it wouldn’t be apparent until the forensic analysis if there was. United States v. Saterstad, 2021 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: CP SW affidavit didn’t have to exclude possibility of IP spoofing to show PC

W.D.Ark.: Officer acting outside his local jurisdiction isn’t 4A issue

“Mr. van Leeuwen also claims that Boone County officers were without jurisdiction when they arrested him in his Marion County home, in alleged violation of Arkansas Code § 14-15-501. However, ‘[a] police violation of state law does not establish a … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Officer acting outside his local jurisdiction isn’t 4A issue

ID: Police knowledge def was attempting to destroy evidence of a murder including burning the body and other evidence was exigency for entry

Police knowledge defendant was destroying evidence of a violent crime on his premises was exigency for a warrantless entry. “Lopez reported to the police that he had seen Davis’s body.” Police knew: “Smith was actively attempting to destroy evidence by … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ID: Police knowledge def was attempting to destroy evidence of a murder including burning the body and other evidence was exigency for entry

TX1: Police coming to door for knock-and-talk wasn’t a trespass

Police came to defendant’s door for a knock-and-talk, and, when he opened it, the officers smelled marijuana. They went off for a search warrant. Approaching the door for a knock-and-talk was not a trespass. Howard v. State, 2021 Tex. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Knock and talk, Prison and jail searches, Trespass | Comments Off on TX1: Police coming to door for knock-and-talk wasn’t a trespass