Author Archives: Hall

IL: State showed reasonable belief in common authority for consent

The state established reasonable belief in common authority of defendant’s wife over his micro-SD card where there was child pornography. To rebut the state’s consent case, defendant would have to show that she actually had limited authority over the card, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: State showed reasonable belief in common authority for consent

E.D.N.Y.: Def already lawfully arrested suffered no separate 4A violation by being taken to ATF, too

Defendant already lawfully arrested wasn’t unreasonably seized by also taking him to ATF for further questioning. United States v. Rodriguez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158008 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2021). The affidavit showed “ample probable cause” and the Franks challenge is … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def already lawfully arrested suffered no separate 4A violation by being taken to ATF, too

N.D.Ill.: No federal right to challenge administrative SW before execution

“[F]ederal decisions outside this circuit do not change the Court’s conclusion that Anthony Marano has no pre-execution right to judicial review of the administrative inspection warrant.” In re Establishment Inspection of Anthony Marano Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157819 (N.D.Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: No federal right to challenge administrative SW before execution

Cal.3d: DNA obtained from def’s arrest in another unprosecuted case could be used to link him to a prior murder

Defendant’s DNA obtained from an arrest with probable cause but where he wasn’t formally charged could be used to link him to a prior murder, relying on Maryland v. King. People v. Roberts, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 692 (3d Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on Cal.3d: DNA obtained from def’s arrest in another unprosecuted case could be used to link him to a prior murder

CA11 (en banc): Preponderance standard required for inevitable discovery

“We granted rehearing en banc in this case to decide what standard of proof the government must satisfy to show that the evidence would ultimately have been discovered through lawful means without the constitutional violation. Must it show there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA11 (en banc): Preponderance standard required for inevitable discovery

CA8: Some evidence of nexus saves SW under GFE

Under the good faith exception, executing officers are entitled to rely on the magistrate judge’s nexus finding with some actual basis they can reasonably rely on, even if it technically might have been wrong. United States v. Barnes, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Pretext | Comments Off on CA8: Some evidence of nexus saves SW under GFE

DC: PO’s turning over supervisee’s GPS tracking to police not unreasonable

Defendant on probation in D.C. was supervised by the Court Supervision and Offender Services Agency. After he violated terms of probation, he was placed on GPS monitoring. It was not unreasonable for CSOSA to share that information with D.C. Metro … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on DC: PO’s turning over supervisee’s GPS tracking to police not unreasonable

N.D.Ga.: Cell phone lock screen is in plain view

On a cell phone, “information that simply appears on a lock screen, without requiring digital entry, is in plain view.” United States v. Blair, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156445 (N.D.Ga. Aug. 18, 2021). Defendant didn’t have a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Cell phone lock screen is in plain view

ND: When video contradicts officer, trial court’s credibility determination isn’t binding

Where the video of the stop clearly contradicts the officer’s testimony on the basis for the stop, the appellate court can reject the trial court’s credibility finding. Here, it was whether defendant’s license plate light worked. The video showed it … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on ND: When video contradicts officer, trial court’s credibility determination isn’t binding

CA7: Deadly force to a non-suspect civilian not resisting arrest can be unreasonable

“Viewing all of the facts in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, we find that a reasonable jury could conclude that Garrett violated Steven’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures when Garrett applied deadly force to … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA7: Deadly force to a non-suspect civilian not resisting arrest can be unreasonable

WI: Checking traffic detainee’s compliance with prior bond conditions violated Rodriguez

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and defendant was on bond from a pending case. The officer decided to inquire into defendant was in compliance with the bond terms. That exceeded the normal incidents of a traffic stop. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Checking traffic detainee’s compliance with prior bond conditions violated Rodriguez

WaPo: We built a system like Apple’s to flag child sexual abuse material — and concluded the tech was dangerous

WaPo: We built a system like Apple’s to flag child sexual abuse material — and concluded the tech was dangerous by Jonathan Mayer and Anunay Kulshrestha (“We wrote the only peer-reviewed publication on how to build a system like Apple’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: We built a system like Apple’s to flag child sexual abuse material — and concluded the tech was dangerous

W.D.Mo.: Even if pretextual, this stop was otherwise reasonable

The traffic stop here was reasonable even if pretextual. United States v. Brown, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155885 (W.D.Mo. July 30, 2021).* There was justification for defendant’s stop: driving 100 mph and other traffic violations. United States v. Young, 2021 … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Even if pretextual, this stop was otherwise reasonable

CA11: New facts of alleged illegal search already ruled on not appropriate for successor habeas

Defendant’s attempt at a successor habeas on four grounds includes one that there is new evidence that he was wrongfully arrested. That was previously addressed before the new evidence claim, and it’s denied. “ An applicant cannot create a new … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA11: New facts of alleged illegal search already ruled on not appropriate for successor habeas

CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

Property lawfully seized by the city is destroyed or sold after a short while if unclaimed. That doesn’t make it an unreasonable seizure or a taking. Conyers v. City of Chicago, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24676 (7th Cir. Aug. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

W.D.N.Y.: Govt’s failure to raise GFE before USMJ is waiver

Government waived the good faith exception by not raising it before the USMJ. United States v. Stearns, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154919 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021). The trial court didn’t make sufficient findings on whether a handgun in plain view … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Govt’s failure to raise GFE before USMJ is waiver

D.Minn.: How search occurred shows USMJ no credibility on officer’s claim they could smell MJ

USMJ R&R finds officer not credible on his claim that he could smell marijuana in the car as justification for its search. United States v. Rolenc, 20-cr-137 (NEB/ECW) (D.Minn. Aug. 12, 2021). It’s a fascinating look at how the defense … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: How search occurred shows USMJ no credibility on officer’s claim they could smell MJ

NYTimes: The Illusion of Privacy Is Getting Harder to Sell

NYTimes: The Illusion of Privacy Is Getting Harder to Sell by Greg Bensinger:

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: The Illusion of Privacy Is Getting Harder to Sell

ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

Defendant’s patdown as a passenger on smell of marijuana was reasonable during the stop, but a search of his person was not. There was no justification for a search of his person. State v. K.V. (In the Interest of K.V.), … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on ND: Search of passenger’s person for smell of MJ in car was unreasonable

CAAF: When PC for warrant was a close call, GFE applies

The question of probable cause for defendant’s UA was a close call. Therefore, the good faith exception applies. The officers essentially did everything right and that should be rewarded, and there’s no reason to reverse the finding of probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches | Comments Off on CAAF: When PC for warrant was a close call, GFE applies