Author Archives: Hall

OH: Statute doesn’t change rule that felony arrest on PC doesn’t need an arrest warrant

The Fourth Amendment and Ohio Constitution permit felony arrests in public on probable cause without exigency. Statute doesn’t change that. State v. Jordan, 2021-Ohio-3922, 2021 Ohio LEXIS 2213 (Nov. 9, 2021). “Here, the collective knowledge of Troopers Schulz, Colindres, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH: Statute doesn’t change rule that felony arrest on PC doesn’t need an arrest warrant

S.D.Cal.: Minister of church with several locations doesn’t have standing from status alone

Being a church minister with several locations does not confer standing as to search warrants for the church as a whole. United States v. Torres, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215682 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 8, 2021):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Minister of church with several locations doesn’t have standing from status alone

S.D.N.Y.: Supposed Franks challenge really only expressing things for cross at trial

Defendant’s motion to reconsideration seems to raise a Franks-type challenge to the search which was not the focus of his original motion to suppress. What he raises “may be interesting cross-examination at trial, [but] they fail entirely to undermine the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Supposed Franks challenge really only expressing things for cross at trial

D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

Defendant’s flight from the police and abandonment of items in flight was not while he was “seized.” Thus, the need to decide reasonable suspicion for a stop is obviated. United States v. Sockwell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215294 (D.Conn. Nov. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact

The good faith exception is here directly applied to a warrantless stop and resulting search because of a “reasonable” mistake of law. United States v. McBroom, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215219 (W.D.Pa. Nov. 8. 2021):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact

W.D.Tex.: Stone bar applies whether 4A challenge made or not; could it have been?

“The Stone bar applies to ‘to all claims arising under the Fourth Amendment,’ including challenges to the seizure of evidence, Hughes v. Dretke, 412 F.3d 582, 596 (5th Cir. 2005) and even to claims ‘where the petitioner did not avail … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Stone bar applies whether 4A challenge made or not; could it have been?

NJ.com: New N.J. vehicle registration law has some drivers worried about privacy, cops looking at their phones

NJ.com: New N.J. vehicle registration law has some drivers worried about privacy, cops looking at their phones by Larry Higgs (“New Jersey became the third state Monday to allow drivers to show a police officer an electronic copy of their … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on NJ.com: New N.J. vehicle registration law has some drivers worried about privacy, cops looking at their phones

E.D.Cal.: PC affidavit for extradition ordered unsealed as a public record

The probable cause affidavit for defendant’s extradition to Iraq for murder is ordered unsealed. There no longer is any justification for keeping it sealed and not a public judicial record. The prior reasons for sealing it no longer exist. In … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: PC affidavit for extradition ordered unsealed as a public record

CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

Merely asking for ID is not a seizure. “Officer Hotz’s conduct would not have communicated to a reasonable person that he could not leave. Officer Hotz was alone, she did not display a weapon, she did not touch the defendants, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

Crypto currency now subject to 26 U.S.C. § 6050i reporting like cash. Any 4A implications? No.

See Quartz: The infrastructure bill makes crypto tax-reporting failures a felony by Scott Nover. Cryptocurrency is added in to 26 U.S.C. § 6050i on cash or cash equivalent transactions. The writer poses a Fourth Amendment question: The requirements could violate … Continue reading →

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Crypto currency now subject to 26 U.S.C. § 6050i reporting like cash. Any 4A implications? No.

CNS: Activists leak 600 hours of mostly Dallas police helicopter footage after city’s 22 terabyte loss of criminal case data

CNS: Activists leak 600 hours of mostly Dallas police helicopter footage after city’s 22 terabyte loss of criminal case data (“The leaked video shows the surveillance of people in their front yards, standing by their cars and sunbathing with no … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CNS: Activists leak 600 hours of mostly Dallas police helicopter footage after city’s 22 terabyte loss of criminal case data

KS: Officer did not have to rely on def’s representation AW was being withdrawn; dispatch confirmed it was still valid before arrest

There was an arrest warrant for defendant, but it was vacated by the issuing court eight hours after defendant’s arrest. Defense counsel was trying to get it vacated at the time. “Here, Rollf testified that under department policy, after dispatch … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on KS: Officer did not have to rely on def’s representation AW was being withdrawn; dispatch confirmed it was still valid before arrest

CA6: No REP in truck driven without authority and probably stolen

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a truck that was, for all intents and purposes, stolen from a mentally ill woman who could not remember who it was loaned to or when. Moreover, he denied knowledge of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: No REP in truck driven without authority and probably stolen

D.Vt.: Def has to show his REP in his Facebook account; what are the privacy settings?

Defendant didn’t show a reasonable expectation of privacy in his Facebook account by showing what he did to keep the account private. Even if he did, there was probable cause for the Facebook warrant. United States v. Whitcomb, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Def has to show his REP in his Facebook account; what are the privacy settings?

CA1: Burden on “neutral and detached magistrate” is on defense, and here the showing was speculative

The search warrant issuing magistrate’s husband was a doctor and a potential victim of a DoS cyberattack at a children’s hospital in Boston, allegedly perpetrated for personal reasons. The claim the USMJ was not neutral and detached is speculative. “But … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA1: Burden on “neutral and detached magistrate” is on defense, and here the showing was speculative

Cal.2: Either RS or PC required for order to put hands on hood of police car

There was neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion to order defendant to put his hands on the hood of the police car, and it was a seizure without justification. “We conclude that there was neither probable cause to arrest appellant … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Cal.2: Either RS or PC required for order to put hands on hood of police car

VI: A commercial vehicle can’t be stopped and searched merely because of its status

Defendant’s commercial truck was subjected to an inspection stop by a motor carrier officer and a police officer. The prosecution failed to prove that the administrative search of the truck was justified: “The established law does not support the People’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Knock and announce | Comments Off on VI: A commercial vehicle can’t be stopped and searched merely because of its status

E.D.Mich.: Paying $10 for a ride doesn’t increase the passenger’s REP in a vehicle

A passenger who paid a friend $10 to ride in the car has no increased reasonable expectation of privacy for standing. “Defendant’s arguments miss the mark. The key, guiding principle to a finding of standing in both Byrd and Jones … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Paying $10 for a ride doesn’t increase the passenger’s REP in a vehicle

NYTimes: How Police Justify Killing Drivers: The Vehicle Was a Weapon

NYTimes: How Police Justify Killing Drivers: The Vehicle Was a Weapon by Kim Barker, Steve Eder, David D. Kirkpatrick and Arya Sundaram (“A Times investigation into a common defense for shooting motorists found that some officers had put themselves in … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYTimes: How Police Justify Killing Drivers: The Vehicle Was a Weapon

CA3: Merely being on bail isn’t a seizure without serious restrictions

An employment dispute devolved into plaintiff’s arrest for theft of email and a claim of official misconduct. She was acquitted and sued. “Unlike the Appellants in Black or Gallo, Lentz did not experience any significant pretrial restrictions such as extensive … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA3: Merely being on bail isn’t a seizure without serious restrictions