Author Archives: Hall

LATimes: New limits on ‘pretextual stops’ by LAPD officers approved, riling police union

LATimes: New limits on ‘pretextual stops’ by LAPD officers approved, riling police union by Kevin Rector:

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on LATimes: New limits on ‘pretextual stops’ by LAPD officers approved, riling police union

NY Nassau: 14 days pole camera surveillance of def’s residence not unreasonable under 4A or state constitution

Pole camera surveillance of a homeless shelter for 14 days observing defendant coming and going was not an unreasonable search under the state or federal constitution, even if it was his home. People v. Destefano, 2022 NY Slip Op 22052, … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on NY Nassau: 14 days pole camera surveillance of def’s residence not unreasonable under 4A or state constitution

W.D.Mich.: With no evidence to rebut the prosecution evidence def consented to search of his person, the govt met its burden of proof on consent

“In this case, Defendant expressly indicated that he does not dispute the validity of his consent, but solely the scope of that consent. Detective Fox testified that he asked for Defendant’s general consent to search his person and that Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: With no evidence to rebut the prosecution evidence def consented to search of his person, the govt met its burden of proof on consent

CA4: Exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of Posse Comitatus Act

An investigation by the DoD Inspector General is an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act. Besides, a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is not subject to the exclusionary rule. United States v. Vaxima, Inc., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 5315 … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA4: Exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of Posse Comitatus Act

CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

“Where ‘a plaintiff claims that excessive force was used multiple times, “the court must segment the incident into its constituent parts and consider the officer’s entitlement to qualified immunity at each step along the way.”’ Wright, 962 F.3d at 865 … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

CA4: If you’re going to call the search “egregious,” at least cite a case

“Dr. Dong next asserts, without citation to case law, that ‘[e]gregious procedural deficiencies in the investigation, prosecution, trial and sentencing’ occurred such that his convictions and sentence must be reversed. Opening Br. 18. He first points to alleged deficiencies in … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: If you’re going to call the search “egregious,” at least cite a case

CA9: The “shocking the conscience” standard is higher than the 4A standard for use of force

The “shocking the conscience” standard is way higher than the Fourth Amendment standard in excessive force cases. “The plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment claim requires that the officers’ conduct ‘shocks the conscience’—a standard that is more demanding of the plaintiffs than the … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: The “shocking the conscience” standard is higher than the 4A standard for use of force

E.D.La.: Fishing is a heavily regulated industry, and GPS tracking of vessels and reporting of catches is reasonable under Burger

The fishing industry is heavy regulated and has been by Congres since 1793. The government’s requirement of GPS tracking on vessels and reporting of the catch each day for charter fishermen is reasonable and constitutional under Burger v. New York. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Fishing is a heavily regulated industry, and GPS tracking of vessels and reporting of catches is reasonable under Burger

NY Claims: Searching officer’s later perjury indictment over another SW affidavit supports claim over claimant’s conviction set aside as a result of disclosure

Claimant was convicted of drug possession. The state notified him after the fact that the arresting officer had been indicted for perjury for a false search warrant affidavit in an unrelated case. His criminal case was a credibility contest about … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY Claims: Searching officer’s later perjury indictment over another SW affidavit supports claim over claimant’s conviction set aside as a result of disclosure

OH3: Where PC exists as to a car, use of a drug dog before the physical search not unreasonable

Once the officer smells marijuana, it violates no law to use a drug dog first rather than just proceeding to search the car. State v. Jones, 2022-Ohio-561, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 487 (3d Dist. Feb. 18, 2022). (The less intrusive … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH3: Where PC exists as to a car, use of a drug dog before the physical search not unreasonable

NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force

NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force (“In determining ‘objective reasonableness’ in police use of deadly force cases, Martin Schwartz looks at the Tenth Circuit’s recent decision in’ Estate of Taylor v. Salt Lake … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force

N.D.Ga.: Carpenter does not apply to GPS information yet

Defendant’s Carpenter argument against police capturing his GPS information fails. SCOTUS hasn’t ruled yet, but existing law permits it. United States v. Rogers, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33869 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 25, 2022):

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Carpenter does not apply to GPS information yet

N.D.Ga.: Apparently likelihood meth in office building could be moved justified warrantless entry

“[T]he Court finds that the evidence is materially credible and consistent and, taken as a whole, indicates that it appeared very likely that law-enforcement activity had been detected by the time of the warrantless entry, that there was a high … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Apparently likelihood meth in office building could be moved justified warrantless entry

VA Cir.: Proposed geofence warrant lacks PC and particularity

This proposed geofence warrant fails both probable cause for what it seeks to capture and particularity. In re Info. Stored at the Premises Controlled by Google, 2022 Va. Cir. LEXIS 12 (Fairfax Co. Feb. 24, 2022):

Posted in geofence, Particularity | Comments Off on VA Cir.: Proposed geofence warrant lacks PC and particularity

S.D.W.Va.: AUSAs apparently failed duty to court to mitigate this Brady/Giglio issue before it reared its head

The court’s finding of the officer’s recklessness in this search warrant affidavit leads the government to file a motion to reconsider, presumably because it will become Brady/Giglio material in future cases as to the officer. Not only is that denied, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: AUSAs apparently failed duty to court to mitigate this Brady/Giglio issue before it reared its head

TN: Smell of drugs during execution of SW permits detaining occupants

Based on the smell of drugs when executing a search warrant, the officers had the authority to detain the occupants. Linsey v. State, 2022 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 79 (Feb. 25, 2022). Defendant’s stop was reasonable. Shots had been reported … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: Smell of drugs during execution of SW permits detaining occupants

D.Vt.: Overnight guest had standing despite his illegal acts

“Defendant spent the night at the Apartment and was found by law enforcement sleeping in a bed. His alleged illegal activities in the Apartment do not render his expectation of privacy unreasonable.” He has standing. United States v. Santini, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Overnight guest had standing despite his illegal acts

D.Nev.: SW clearly did not authorize downloading of iPhone and iPad at the place of search; no good faith exception

The officer thought the warrant authorized downloading on the premises, but it obviously did not. This is gross negligence, and the good faith exception does not apply. Defendant wasn’t in custody and was not entitled to a Miranda warning when … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Independent source, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Nev.: SW clearly did not authorize downloading of iPhone and iPad at the place of search; no good faith exception

IL: Drug sale in backyard nexus to SW for house

“Granted, the drug sale did not occur inside the residence. Rather, it occurred outside the residence, in the backyard. The question, then, is whether a controlled purchase that took place in the yard of a house in which the drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IL: Drug sale in backyard nexus to SW for house

N.D.Okla.: Misdemeanor arrest warrant permits forcible entry in this circuit

Plaintiff’s claim that a forcible entry for a misdemeanor warrant fails because this circuit has held for 25 years that Payton applies to misdemeanor warrants. Plaintiff does state a claim, however, for failure to knock-and-announce before entry. First v. Hokett, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Overbreadth | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Misdemeanor arrest warrant permits forcible entry in this circuit