Author Archives: Hall

D.Minn.: Court won’t enjoin investigation after SW on ptf’s cell phone

Plaintiff can’t get access to search warrant papers yet because of an ongoing investigation. Second, the court won’t enjoin the use of the information from his seized telephone or order its return because of the ongoing investigation. Lindell v. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Court won’t enjoin investigation after SW on ptf’s cell phone

E.D.Cal.: Govt failed in its burden of proof on justification for protective sweep

The court finds, with the evidence in equipoise, the government didn’t meet its burden of showing the arrest happened inside defendant’s house or outside. This is critical, because the police did a protective sweep and used that to get a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Govt failed in its burden of proof on justification for protective sweep

D.Me.: DEA could subpoena records investigating robbery of a marijuana dispensary

The DEA’s administrative subpoenas over records of the suspect over the alleged robbery of a marijuana dispensary were lawful exercises of power. Carpenter does not apply to mere phone records. United States v. Candelario, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199195 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Me.: DEA could subpoena records investigating robbery of a marijuana dispensary

NY2: Trial court didn’t deny due process by deciding suppression motion on a ground not argued by state, except for being just wrong on the law

The trial court did not deny due process by deciding the suppression issue on an alternative ground not advanced by the state below. The problem is, however, that the record does not support the result below, and it is reversed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Due process, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY2: Trial court didn’t deny due process by deciding suppression motion on a ground not argued by state, except for being just wrong on the law

The Recorder: Court Can’t Grant Request to Return John Eastman’s Emails, Jan. 6 Committee Says

The Recorder: Court Can’t Grant Request to Return John Eastman’s Emails, Jan. 6 Committee Says (“The committee said constitutional provisions, and Eastman’s own late filing, should end his appeal.”)

Posted in E-mail, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on The Recorder: Court Can’t Grant Request to Return John Eastman’s Emails, Jan. 6 Committee Says

GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

Defendant clearly consented to a search of his backpack. When the officer encountered his laptop and opened it to turn it on, defendant never objected. Winslow v. State, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 297 (Nov. 2, 2022). The underlying facts for reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

ID: Not telling arrestee reason for arrest in violation of statute not a 4A violation

Failure to notify an arrestee of the reason for his arrest in violation of the statute does not make the arrest violate the Fourth Amendment or state constitution. State v. Lancaster, 2022 Ida. LEXIS 133 (Nov. 1, 2022). There were … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Body searches, Cell phones, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on ID: Not telling arrestee reason for arrest in violation of statute not a 4A violation

CA11: Can’t force a Franks hearing by mandamus; there’s a right to appeal

“Spencer’s claim for mandamus relief is frivolous. Liberally construing his mandamus petition, Spencer appears to seek an order directing the district court to hold a Franks hearing in his underlying criminal case in relation to the seizure of evidence used … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus | Comments Off on CA11: Can’t force a Franks hearing by mandamus; there’s a right to appeal

IL: No REP in bloody clothes in trauma room at hospital

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a trauma room he was in about 15 minutes before the police arrived. His bloody clothes were in plain view. People v. Turner, 2022 IL App (5th) 190329, 2022 Ill. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IL: No REP in bloody clothes in trauma room at hospital

MD: Two men talking at a car idling in a parking lot in a high-crime residential area at 11:30 pm wasn’t RS

Two men talking with another in a car in a high crime area at 11:30 pm in parking lot in a residential area was not reasonable suspicion. One of the men reached into the car, but there’s no way of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: Two men talking at a car idling in a parking lot in a high-crime residential area at 11:30 pm wasn’t RS

S.D.W.Va.: Protective sweep under a bed is reasonable

The protective sweep here looking under the bed was reasonable. It’s where people hide. Defendant’s contention the sweep went further isn’t clear. Some things were moved and opened, but a search warrant had been executed between the sweep and her … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Protective sweep under a bed is reasonable

E.D.N.Y.: Battering down door at dawn in CP SW wasn’t unreasonable, even if uncalled for

SWAT team entry into defendant’s Queens home at dawn for child pornography on a computer was not unreasonable. The police knew that only defendant, his wife, and their children (the children were “Potential Hazards” according to their operational plan) were … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Battering down door at dawn in CP SW wasn’t unreasonable, even if uncalled for

D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

Affidavits for search warrants are judged by what they contain, not what they lack. United States v. Cass, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195502 (D. Neb. Sep. 30, 2022), adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197043 (D.Neb. Oct. 26, 2022). It was … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

E.D.Pa.: Threat to get SW was real and lawful and did not coerce consent

“Mr. Adams contends that the agents coerced him into giving consent involuntarily when they threatened to seize his phone and hold it until they obtained a search warrant. … I disagree. For the reasons stated below, I conclude that Mr. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Threat to get SW was real and lawful and did not coerce consent

D.Md.: Using def’s key fob to find his car did not violate a REP

Using defendant’s key fob on the key removed from him in a search incident did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy and was reasonable. United States v. Gardner, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196575 (D. Md. Oct. 27, 2022):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Md.: Using def’s key fob to find his car did not violate a REP

D.S.D.: Traffic stop immediately moved into being a drug investigation without RS and was unreasonable

Defendant’s stop was for not having an LPN and a cracked windshield. There was a temporary permit for the vehicle and the crack wasn’t obstructing vision. Bringing in a drug dog for a sniff of car was unreasonable. The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Traffic stop immediately moved into being a drug investigation without RS and was unreasonable

D.D.C.: In motion to withdraw plea, waived motion to suppress was arguable and IAC

Here, failure to file a motion to suppress on the obtaining defendant’s passcode for his cell phone was ineffective assistance of counsel. At this point, it was debatable, and it should have been raised. The government had the phones, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Privileges | Comments Off on D.D.C.: In motion to withdraw plea, waived motion to suppress was arguable and IAC

D.N.J.: Encountering 4 officers at landing on stairs who wouldn’t let him pass was a seizure

Defendant encountered four officers standing on a landing, and they impeded his movements. This amounted to a seizure. United States v. Jackson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194856 (D.N.J. Oct. 26, 2022). Mistaken identity on the person being seized is usually … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Encountering 4 officers at landing on stairs who wouldn’t let him pass was a seizure

D.Nev.: Ptf states claim AT&T provided real time CSLI to police without warrant

Plaintiff’s complaint that AT&T provided real time CSLI to Reno police without a search warrant states enough of a claim to proceed for now. Houston v. AT&T, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194789 (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2022). Defendant was found … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Ptf states claim AT&T provided real time CSLI to police without warrant

W.D.Pa.: Anticipatory SW’s triggering condition was package going in house; landlord’s taking it in sufficient

The triggering condition in this anticipatory warrant was the package going inside the home. Here, the landlord took it in, not defendant. Still, under Grubbs, that was sufficient. United States v. Tabor, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194653 (W.D. Pa. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Anticipatory SW’s triggering condition was package going in house; landlord’s taking it in sufficient