D.Nev.: Ptf states claim AT&T provided real time CSLI to police without warrant

Plaintiff’s complaint that AT&T provided real time CSLI to Reno police without a search warrant states enough of a claim to proceed for now. Houston v. AT&T, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194789 (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2022).

Defendant was found to have consented to this search. Being mentally agitated by the situation isn’t enough to show involuntariness. United States v. Bell, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193926 (W.D. Mo. Sep. 14, 2022),* adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192993 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 24, 2022).*

“Here the stop and all actions occurring before the officers developed probable cause to search the vehicle took place within eight minutes. The officers’ questions about the presence of illegal items in the car were appropriate and took place during the normal course of handling the traffic infraction. Under the cases cited by Khalaf, his traffic stop was not unreasonably prolonged in violation of the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Khalaf, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194122 (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.