Author Archives: Hall

Reason: Justice Department Orders DEA to Halt Airport Searches Because of ‘Significant Issues’ With Cash Seizures

Reason: Justice Department Orders DEA to Halt Airport Searches Because of ‘Significant Issues’ With Cash Seizures by C.J. Ciaramella (“The DEA paid one airline employee tens of thousands of dollars to snoop on travel itineraries and flag passengers for searches.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches, Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Justice Department Orders DEA to Halt Airport Searches Because of ‘Significant Issues’ With Cash Seizures

MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

Defendant didn’t object pretrial or at trial to the search, and he can’t argue plain error now. State v. Lane, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 837 (Nov. 19, 2024). The finding defendant was stopped because of a seatbelt violation is not … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Mistake of law, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

PA: Merely reaching in car to secure gun in plain view was reasonable under state’s more stringent automobile exception

It was reasonable for the officer to reach in an open door and secure a gun seen in plain view under Pennsylvania’s more stringent automobile exception. Commonwealth v. Saunders, 2024 Pa. LEXIS 1734 (Nov. 20, 2024) (and there’s three opinions; … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: Merely reaching in car to secure gun in plain view was reasonable under state’s more stringent automobile exception

N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

Shareholders cannot bring a Fourth Amendment claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party. Elfand v. Adams, 2024 NY Slip Op 24289, 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19021 (N.Y. Co. Nov. 18, 2024). The CI’s information led to a … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

W.D.Pa.: Protective sweep of house was reasonable despite def’s arrest outside

The officers had knowledge defendant had confederates in his drug operation. While he was arrested outside his house, a protective sweep inside was still shown to be reasonable. United States v. Pope, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209740 (W.D. Pa. Nov. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Protective sweep of house was reasonable despite def’s arrest outside

NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

A trial judge in New Mexico noticed that there were an unusual number of suspect warrantless searches going unchallenged by the defense. She set suppression hearings and several cases were nolle prossed. A few survived to be heard. On certification … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

No search warrant is needed for the jail to turn over plaintiff’s jail telephone calls to the DA’s office. Wallace v. Maricopa Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209545 (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024).* When an officer invokes the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

VA: Furtive movements during stop justified protective sweep of car

Furtive movements during a traffic stop added to reasonable suspicion of a potential weapon. Bazemore v. Commonwealth, 2024 Va. App. LEXIS 659 (Nov. 12, 2024).* “Under our highly deferential standard of review, it also created a sufficient—if weak—nexus between Deeble’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on VA: Furtive movements during stop justified protective sweep of car

CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

The officer’s body slam of a resisting minor suspect about half his weight was entitled to qualified immunity. “But even if the facts of our case did fit Richmond, the statement that ‘less force is appropriate’ would not put every … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

A 48 hour pretrial detainee in a dry cell has no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209407 (D. Alaska Nov. 18, 2024).* Defendant’s Franks officer of proof with a proffered corrected affidavit for … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

Force Science: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing

Force Science via Police 1: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing by Lewis “Von” Kliem (“The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear Barnes v. Felix, a case that could redefine how officers’ split-second decisions are judged” [¶] … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Force Science: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing

D.Mont.: Off-roading during fire restriction was RS

Reasonable suspicion and a park violation: “Accordingly, Sergeant Call’s 11 years of experience in Park County coupled with his knowledge of state and county law gave him reason to suspect that Mitchell was potentially engaged in criminal conduct—namely, trespassing and … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Off-roading during fire restriction was RS

W.D.Tenn.: Def succeeds in a Franks challenge

Something we don’t see hardly ever: The omitted information was material to probable cause and the affiant omitted it thinking it didn’t matter. But it did. And the good faith exception doesn’t apply here. United States v. Pettigrew, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Def succeeds in a Franks challenge

D.S.D.: SW for 11 years of iCloud lacked all particularity and GFE didn’t save it

The warrant here authorized search of defendant’s iCloud account for 11 years worth of information despite the probable cause being limited to one event in 2022. The warrant was based on a template that authorized search of the entire account, … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.S.D.: SW for 11 years of iCloud lacked all particularity and GFE didn’t save it

N.D.Iowa: DUI stop justifies search for open containers

Defendant’s DUI stop justified a search for open containers, and a firearm was validly found. United States v. Stuckey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207801 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 15, 2024). Defendant moved to suppress a cell phone warrant at the border … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: DUI stop justifies search for open containers

Dual sovereignty: W.D.Mich: The defense can’t relitigate grant of state court suppression of the same evidence in federal court (but the federal government can)

2255 petitioner originally had a motion to suppress granted in state court, and the federal government indicted him. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for failing to argue collateral estoppel, and issue foreclosed under circuit precedent. Miller v. United States, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on Dual sovereignty: W.D.Mich: The defense can’t relitigate grant of state court suppression of the same evidence in federal court (but the federal government can)

CA6: A rarity: No RS found for dog sniff on the highway

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and the officer ultimately called for a drug dog. No drugs, but he’s a felon in possession. The court finds no reasonable suspicion for extending the stop. The government proffered travel plans, criminal history, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: A rarity: No RS found for dog sniff on the highway

E.D.Va.: The affiant’s passing on alleged exaggerations from other officers wasn’t material to PC

Relying on reports of other officers that could have been exaggerations in part didn’t show that the affiant was intentionally or recklessly misleading the court. Also, “the Defendant has failed to demonstrate that Officer Granville’s inclusion of the exaggerated statement … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: The affiant’s passing on alleged exaggerations from other officers wasn’t material to PC

N.D.Cal.: Slow walked traffic detention became unreasonable

The officer slow walked “what should have been a brief detention” and can’t rely on its “attempt to characterize the situation as an evolving [which] one misses the mark.” United States v. Davis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207203 (N.D. Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Slow walked traffic detention became unreasonable

S.D.Cal.: Def counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that might have been plausible isn’t IAC per se

“That a motion to suppress or an objection based on trial testimony regarding the aerial surveillance video might have been reasonable falls short of establishing deficient performance by counsel. United States v. Reyes, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134866, 2012 WL … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Def counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that might have been plausible isn’t IAC per se