Monthly Archives: October 2022

CA7: 4½ days to figure out ptf was innocent didn’t violate 4A or 14A

“Eli Martinez spent four and a half days in custody while he tried to explain to his jailers that his brother, Hector M. Rodriguez, was the one described in an arrest warrant. After Martinez was released, he sued two probation … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: 4½ days to figure out ptf was innocent didn’t violate 4A or 14A

Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway

Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway by Tim Cushing (“Unfortunately, the federal court handling this case doesn’t think the FBI’s lie matters, at least not in terms of determining probable cause. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Techdirt: Federal Judge Says FBI Misled Magistrate When Seeking Safe Deposit Warrants, OKs Searches Anyway

OH8: No PC for hot pursuit into house on less than RS

The state showed no probable cause to justify a warrantless entry into the home of a fleeing misdemeanant. Police got a citizen’s report of a possible impaired driver. When they found the car, it had just pulled into the driveway … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH8: No PC for hot pursuit into house on less than RS

D.N.M.: There is no exclusionary rule under Rule 41(g)

An action for return of property under Rule 41(g) is not a motion to suppress and does not invoke any exclusionary rule. Eastman v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188438 (D.N.M. Oct. 14, 2022):

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.N.M.: There is no exclusionary rule under Rule 41(g)

E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

Defendant argued that the execution of this search warrant resulted in disclosure of attorney-client privileged information because of alleged misuse of a taint team. But, he provides no context or anything to go on. Taint teams are recognized in such … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Taint team, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

OH8: Trial court’s order to permit def to inspect victim’s home which was scene of the crime violated 4A rights of victim

To prepare for trial, defendant sought an inspection of the victim’s home, the scene of the alleged crime of attempted murder. The trial court erred in the balancing the interests involved of the defendant’s right to a fair trial and … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH8: Trial court’s order to permit def to inspect victim’s home which was scene of the crime violated 4A rights of victim

C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage

Plaintiff’s claim against defendant insurance company for failing to pay an insurance claim for damage during a SWAT team raid on his house goes forward. The policy’s exclusionary clauses are overbroad under California law. Heard v. QBE Ins. Corp., 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: SWAT team raid damage to house included in insurance coverage

D.S.D.: Time waiting for someone to come to remove car, tow truck or friend, was part of incidents of stop

When the vehicle will be removed because of no licensed person to take control, the time between the calling of the tow truck or a friend or family member to take it away and their arrival is part of the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Staleness | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Time waiting for someone to come to remove car, tow truck or friend, was part of incidents of stop

OH: Exclusionary rule does not apply to statutory violations, here a parole search

Defendant signed a consent to parole search form, but the statute says it has to be on reasonable grounds. Here, even if the statute was violated, the exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones. State v. Campbell, 2022-Ohio-3626, … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH: Exclusionary rule does not apply to statutory violations, here a parole search

CA5: Standard of review for QI in excessive force cases

In this excessive force case, the Fifth Circuit discusses qualified immunity in the heat of a confrontation. Henderson v. Harris County, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 28436 (5th Cir. Oct. 12, 2022). The standard of review:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Standard of review for QI in excessive force cases

ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One.

ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One. by Eli Harper (“Each year, child protective services agencies inspect the homes of roughly 3.5 million children, opening refrigerators and closets without a warrant. Only … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on ProPublica/NBC News: Police Need Warrants to Search Homes. Child Welfare Agents Almost Never Get One.

FL1: SW cured alleged defect in probation search where roommate wasn’t on probation

Defendant, not on probation, lived with two probationers. POs showed up for a probation search, and when they saw the extent of what they found and had a nonprobationer, they got a search warrant for the rest of the house. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on FL1: SW cured alleged defect in probation search where roommate wasn’t on probation

FL1: Illegal patdown led to flight and lawful abandonment

Defendant was lawfully stopped, but his patdown was unreasonable. Then he fled on foot. That was abandonment, despite the illegal search. Atwood v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 6855 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 12, 2022):

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on FL1: Illegal patdown led to flight and lawful abandonment

D.Minn.: “‘The Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement is a standard of practical accuracy rather than a hypertechnical one.'”

“’The Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement is a standard of practical accuracy rather than a hypertechnical one.’” Defendant’s particularity argument fails. It was particular enough, and good faith exception applies. United States v. Jones, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185980 (D. Minn. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “‘The Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement is a standard of practical accuracy rather than a hypertechnical one.'”

WaPo: All the ways Amazon’s home gadgets are spying on you

WaPo: All the ways Amazon’s home gadgets are spying on you by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“You may not realize all the ways Amazon is watching your home, your family and you.”). The title inside: Tour Amazon’s dream home, where every … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: All the ways Amazon’s home gadgets are spying on you

CA9: Even conceding potential 4A violations, there was independent source for SW

Even assuming multiple Fourth Amendment violations, the exclusionary rule would not be applied because the police had an independent source in a search warrant that did not depend on the illegal entry. An anticipatory warrant was contemplated but never sought. … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source | Comments Off on CA9: Even conceding potential 4A violations, there was independent source for SW

OH3: An expert witness is not required on the staleness of CP

There is no requirement of an expert in child pornography investigation to be an affiant to provide information about lack of staleness. Also, this was raised for the first time on appeal. State v. Benedict, 2022-Ohio-3600, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Ineffective assistance, Staleness | Comments Off on OH3: An expert witness is not required on the staleness of CP

CT: Entry onto def’s deck was for community caretaking function

The officer’s entry onto defendant’s deck here was of a community caretaking function to inform defendant that a loved one was going to the hospital. It was like a knock-and-talk. State v. Kuehn, 2022 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2075 (Sep. 13, … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Curtilage, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Entry onto def’s deck was for community caretaking function

D.Neb.: Eviction of unruly hotel guest is loss of REP in room as soon as decision is made, even without statute authorizing it

Eviction of an unruly guest from a motel or hotel results in a loss of the renter’s reasonable expectation of privacy even if there is no statute governing it. Thus, the proprietor can hand over the keys to the police … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Eviction of unruly hotel guest is loss of REP in room as soon as decision is made, even without statute authorizing it

WaPo: 6 questions about flying with marijuana, answered

WaPo: 6 questions about flying with marijuana, answered | What to know about federal laws, TSA and flying with CBD by Natalie B. Compton:

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on WaPo: 6 questions about flying with marijuana, answered