OH: Exclusionary rule does not apply to statutory violations, here a parole search

Defendant signed a consent to parole search form, but the statute says it has to be on reasonable grounds. Here, even if the statute was violated, the exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones. State v. Campbell, 2022-Ohio-3626, 2022 Ohio LEXIS 2098 (Oct. 13, 2022).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress incriminating jail telephone calls. Toha v. Fla. AG, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185228 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 15, 2022).*

Even if Franks applies to arrest warrants, an open question in this circuit, defendant didn’t satisfy it. United States v. Powell, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185581 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2022).*

The affidavit for warrant was not so deficient that the warrant wouldn’t have issued. The good faith exception also applies. United States v. Jones, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185980 (D. Minn. Oct. 11, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.