Monthly Archives: February 2022

TX: Exclusionary rule is statutory and harmless error analysis required

The Texas exclusionary rule is statutory and not a constitutional remedy since 1922. Thus, harmless error analysis is required, and the case remanded for that. Holder v. State, 2022 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 72 (Feb. 2, 2022). “Accordingly, under the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Seizure | Comments Off on TX: Exclusionary rule is statutory and harmless error analysis required

NC: Objection to seized evidence without a motion to suppress is waiver

Defendant objected at trial to admission of evidence, but it was not a timely motion to suppress. It is waived. State v. Draughon, 2022-NCCOA-58, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 53 (Feb. 1, 2022). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on NC: Objection to seized evidence without a motion to suppress is waiver

CA5: 17-day delay of package for investigation and SW was still reasonable

This 17-day delay in holding a package for investigation and developing probable cause for a search warrant was not unreasonable. There was reasonable suspicion for the initial detention, and, despite the delay, it was still reasonable. United States v. Martinez, … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: 17-day delay of package for investigation and SW was still reasonable

D.Md.: Six-year delay in getting SW for cell phone unreasonable

Officers had defendant’s cell phone for nearly six years from 2015 to 2020, and he was in custody for much of the time. Searching the cell phone six years after seizure was unreasonable. United States v. Briscoe, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Md.: Six-year delay in getting SW for cell phone unreasonable

D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

USMJ’s report is rejected in part. On the reasonable suspicion finding: “Here, the government relies on several factors to establish reasonable suspicion. The court has found that some of these factors, such as the visibly pulsing heartbeat and rapid breathing, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

IL: Officer’s interpretation of lane movement statute was unreasonable and stop suppressed

Defendant’s move within his lane was clearly not a violation of the lane change statute, so the stop based on that was not objectively reasonable. The product of the stop is suppressed. People v. Jackson, 2022 IL App (3d) 190621, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on IL: Officer’s interpretation of lane movement statute was unreasonable and stop suppressed

W.D.Okla.: Whether 14A or 4A applies to ptf’s excessive force claim on arrest before PC found by judicial officer, result the same

Plaintiff’s excessive force claim occurred after arrest but before a judicial determination of probable cause. “If so, Mr. Willis would not have been a pretrial detainee for purposes of Plaintiff’s excessive force claim. However, because the parties characterize him as … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Whether 14A or 4A applies to ptf’s excessive force claim on arrest before PC found by judicial officer, result the same

NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

Dismissal of a § 1983 excessive force case in federal court was not collateral estoppel for a state case under the state tort claims act. Hernandez v. Parker, 2022 N.M. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 1, 2022). Extending this stop was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

CA11: Failure to plead facts of standing or REP requires denial of motion to suppress

“If a defendant fails to plead sufficient facts to show a reasonable expectation of privacy, ‘a trial court may refuse a defendant’s request for a suppression hearing’ and deny his motion to suppress.” United States v. Robinson, 2022 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Failure to plead facts of standing or REP requires denial of motion to suppress

N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

There was a six day delay between seizure of six cell phones and issuance of a search warrant for them. This was reasonable under CA11 precedent. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Norwood, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

OH11: No RS for frisking a slumbering motorist

Police were called to a man slumped over his steering wheel maybe passed out. They roused him. Defendant’s patdown was not justified by reasonable suspicion. State v. Shoenberger, 2022-Ohio-253, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 232 (11th Jan. 31, 2022). Defendant’s roadside … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: No RS for frisking a slumbering motorist

E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

Plaintiff operated a gym entered by the police for an administrative search during Covid when it should have been temporarily closed under a state executive order. They accessed it with a keycard from the prior owner who sold it years … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

W.D.Ky.: Confiscation of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not a 4A

“Because it is the First and Fourteenth Amendment, and not the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure that protects against the reading and confiscation of legal mail by prison officials, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Confiscation of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not a 4A

E.D.Mich.: No standing to claim knock-and-announce violation of another’s house

Plaintiff has no standing to complain of a knock-and-announce violation of another person. “Here, Plaintiff does not even claim that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in McMullen’s house. But even if he did make such a claim, the … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No standing to claim knock-and-announce violation of another’s house

CA1 denies rehearing en banc on Jardines and denies qualified immunity

French v. Merrill, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2625 (1st Cir. Jan. 28, 2022) (3-3*) (panel decision 15 F.4th 116 (1st Cir. Oct. 1, 2021)). On why rehearing should not be granted:

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1 denies rehearing en banc on Jardines and denies qualified immunity