Category Archives: Excessive force

N.D.Iowa: Verifying validity of an AW wasn’t unreasonable extension of stop

The stop was concededly valid, and a warrant was found. Verifying that the warrant is still out is not an unreasonable extension of the stop. United States v. Colquhoun, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149487 (N.D. Iowa Aug. 21, 2024). [Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Verifying validity of an AW wasn’t unreasonable extension of stop

N.D.Ohio: Gang members’ waving guns in Instagram post was RS for later stop

“To start, the Instagram video that showed Brown, McCullers, and others waving firearms and pointing them directly at the camera provided the officers with reasonable suspicion to stop the two men. That’s because, under Virginia law, it is ‘unlawful for … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Gang members’ waving guns in Instagram post was RS for later stop

CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

Officers responded to a domestic disturbance call and heard shouting inside that made them believe there was a fight inside. Summary judgment for the officers in a warrantless entry case was properly granted. Ramirez v. Killian, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

CA9: Dog handler allegedly allowing police dog to excessively bite ptf denied QI

“Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Rock, Miller allowed the canine to continue biting Rock even though he was unarmed, did not present an immediate threat to the officers or others, and did not resist or actively … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Dog handler allegedly allowing police dog to excessively bite ptf denied QI

CA9: Where officers were attempting to de-escalate a situation, warning about deadly force not required

A warning before deadly force would be used was contrary to the officers’ efforts to de-escalate the situation. Otherwise qualified immunity applies. Eyre v. City of Fairbanks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19770 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2024) (2-1).* Plaintiff’s claim … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body searches, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Where officers were attempting to de-escalate a situation, warning about deadly force not required

CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

There is no Fourth Amendment requirement that the officer have read or have in hand an arrest warrant. United States v. Moore, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19668 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, 2024). The officers’ use of force here was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

WI: Initial PC and bail determination not critical stage, but if it becomes more, yes

While the probable cause and bail decision itself is not a critical stage, the post-arrest process of determining bail is the critical stage point where the right to counsel attaches. Here, an identification procedure was included. State v. Robinson, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on WI: Initial PC and bail determination not critical stage, but if it becomes more, yes

CA5: Drug dog jumping in already open window not unreasonable

Drug dog’s spontaneously jumping in the vehicle window that was down when the stop began wasn’t directed by the officer and didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Wilson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19424 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Drug dog jumping in already open window not unreasonable

D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

New arguments raised at the suppression hearing are considered waived. Even if it was considered, it lacks merit: The officer could open the car for a check for other passengers for officer safety. United States v. Hargraves, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

W.D.N.Y.: Def wearing a mask to make him harder to identify doesn’t immunize his arrest on a warrant

“Wearing a mask does not immunize a wanted person from a valid arrest warrant. Here, law enforcement properly executed an arrest warrant for Defendant Apprentiace Singletary. Singletary cannot argue that his arrest was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment because he … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def wearing a mask to make him harder to identify doesn’t immunize his arrest on a warrant

E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

Exposure to Covid-19 in prison didn’t state a Fourth or Eighth Amendment claim. Dingle v. Tommage, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124710 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 2024). Defendant was driving with a suspended license, and WVSP protocol dictated impoundment of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

Excessive force claims are new for Bivens, and rejected. Here, it was his restraint in a courtroom by US Marshals and CSOs. Edwards v. Gizzi, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17100 (2d Cir. July 12, 2024). Plaintiff was shot in the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

A search warrant in a robbery case looked for stolen property and the mask involved. When police executed the warrant, they found his cell phone with him wearing the mask as the wallpaper image on the phone. “We find without … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

CO: State law can alter a sheriff’s agreement with CBP to enforce immigration law

While Colorado sheriffs have civil arrest powers, an agreement with CBP to enforce immigration law under 8 U.S.C. § 1357(g) violated state law. Nash v. Mikesell, 2024 COA 68, 2024 Colo. App. LEXIS 813 (July 3, 2024). In a chase … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CO: State law can alter a sheriff’s agreement with CBP to enforce immigration law

D.Kan.: Driving another person’s car some other times doesn’t give standing

Merely driving another person’s car some doesn’t give standing. “Defendant (like the defendants in Rakas) has neither a property nor possessory interest in the vehicle and thus lacks standing to challenge the search of it. He did not have a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Driving another person’s car some other times doesn’t give standing

D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

On remand in Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989, 209 L.Ed.2d 190 (Mar. 25, 2021), the defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied. Torres v. Madrid, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117079 (D.N.M. July 2, 2024).* An out-of-state temporary plate where … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable

The owner of a vehicle who was not driving or in it when it was stopped has no standing to challenge the stop as opposed to an inventory search. “After considering, as it must, ‘all the facts and circumstances’ of … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable

LA1: Opening car door to check for others after speeding stop was reasonable where windows were overtinted

Defendant was seen at 10 pm on radar going 94 in a 35, and the officer gave chase for over four miles, sometimes clocking defendant at 135. When finally stopped and with defendant in the police car, the officer went … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: Opening car door to check for others after speeding stop was reasonable where windows were overtinted

CA11: Cotenant’s knowledge of their cotenant being on probation enough to search them, too

“The Supreme Court has said that a warrantless search of a probationer’s home, supported by reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and authorized by a probation condition, is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Cotenant’s knowledge of their cotenant being on probation enough to search them, too

CA11: Officers participating in violation of 4A can be sued, too

“Marglli Gallego brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against four police officers. She alleged that two of those officers—whom we’ll call the ‘off-duty officers’—unreasonably seized her in violation of the Fourth Amendment. And she alleged that the other two … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officers participating in violation of 4A can be sued, too