CA9: Where officers were attempting to de-escalate a situation, warning about deadly force not required

A warning before deadly force would be used was contrary to the officers’ efforts to de-escalate the situation. Otherwise qualified immunity applies. Eyre v. City of Fairbanks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19770 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2024) (2-1).*

Plaintiff’s claim that the cell phone company turned over his information in response to a warrant was barred by the statute of limitations. Boyle v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19789 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2024).*

Plaintiff’s decedent was unarmed, but it was apparent that the officer didn’t know it, coupled with his sudden move. There is qualified immunity. Franklin v. Popovich, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19660 (11th Cir. Aug. 6, 2024).*

Plaintiff inmate’s blood draw was for medical purposes and not for investigation. Therefore, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t apply. Banks v. Bellevue Hosp., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139463 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2024).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body searches, Excessive force, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.