Category Archives: Qualified immunity

N.D.Ohio: Cell phone next to seized drugs was nexus for SW

“In sum, the search warrant affidavit contained considerably more than the mere fact that Bell was arrested with the cell phone on his person. Rather, law enforcement found the cell phone on Bell’s person near ‘the very drugs’ he has … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Cell phone next to seized drugs was nexus for SW

CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

Officers responded to a domestic disturbance call and heard shouting inside that made them believe there was a fight inside. Summary judgment for the officers in a warrantless entry case was properly granted. Ramirez v. Killian, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

CA9: Dog handler allegedly allowing police dog to excessively bite ptf denied QI

“Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Rock, Miller allowed the canine to continue biting Rock even though he was unarmed, did not present an immediate threat to the officers or others, and did not resist or actively … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Dog handler allegedly allowing police dog to excessively bite ptf denied QI

CA8: Changing the inventory search argument on appeal was waiver

Defendant’s chain of custody argument after an inventory search was differently articulated than in the district court so it’s not preserved. United States v. Edwards, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19568 (8th Cir. Aug. 6, 2024).* Defendant’s nolo plea waived his … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA8: Changing the inventory search argument on appeal was waiver

CA7: No court has suppressed a Playpen SW, and changing the argument up a bit doesn’t succeed either

Every court to have dealt with the good faith exception in Playpen warrants has sustained them. This case attempts a different casting of the argument, but it’s rejected too. United States v. Dorosheff, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19590 (7th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: No court has suppressed a Playpen SW, and changing the argument up a bit doesn’t succeed either

S.D.N.Y.: Slapping ptf during her arrest to control her not shown to be unreasonable

Plaintiff does not plausibly allege that slapping during arrest to control her was objectively unreasonable. Harding v. Gould, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141944 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2024).* The officer here shot and killed a 13-year-old holding and raising a toy … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Slapping ptf during her arrest to control her not shown to be unreasonable

CADC: Ptf’s arrest on mistaken identity was still reasonable

The District Court correctly granted qualified immunity to an officer who detained plaintiff due to a mistaken identity fugitive warrant because there was no showing that any reasonable official in the defendant’s shoes would have understood that he was violating … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CADC: Ptf’s arrest on mistaken identity was still reasonable

CA9: Where officers were attempting to de-escalate a situation, warning about deadly force not required

A warning before deadly force would be used was contrary to the officers’ efforts to de-escalate the situation. Otherwise qualified immunity applies. Eyre v. City of Fairbanks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19770 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2024) (2-1).* Plaintiff’s claim … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body searches, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Where officers were attempting to de-escalate a situation, warning about deadly force not required

N.D.Cal.: Seizure or destruction of homeless persons’ unabandoned personal property violated 4A

“This case is similar to Lavan where the Ninth Circuit stated that when the City of Los Angeles destroyed unhoused Plaintiffs’ unabandoned personal possessions left on public sidewalks, those seizures were unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. 693 F.3d at 1030. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Seizure or destruction of homeless persons’ unabandoned personal property violated 4A

DE: Inevitable discovery can’t be based on speculation

The state’s argument on inevitable discovery is really based on speculation, and that’s not enough. State v. Franks, 2024 Del. Super. LEXIS 561 (Aug. 1, 2024). Plaintiff was arrested for drugs, held five months, then released. “We hold that the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DE: Inevitable discovery can’t be based on speculation

DC: Illegal stop led to finding weapon, and it was not attenuated

Defendant was subjected to a stop that violated the Fourth Amendment. Information from that stop sufficiently led to a search of a dwelling producing a gun. That was fruit of the poisonous tree. There was a first search that could … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on DC: Illegal stop led to finding weapon, and it was not attenuated

CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

Unlocking a door, here that opens out, when the police are knocking is not implied consent to enter. Quinn v. Zerkle, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154 (4th Cir. Aug. 1, 2024). There was a reckless geographical error in the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

Knowing of a search starts the statute of limitations for any claim on it. Reguli v. Russ, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19008 (6th Cir. July 31, 2024). Defendant waived his motion to suppress by not adequately supporting it with factual … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

When the police arrive for an arrest and the occupants say the guy they’re looking for isn’t there, police don’t have to credit that and just leave. Green-Page v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134563 (W.D.N.Y. July 30, 2024)* … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

CA11: While prison visitor strip search violated 4A, SCOTUS and this circuit have never ruled, so QI applies [and QI reigns supreme]

A prison visitor was fully strip searched on entry into a Georgia state prison. This search violated the Fourth Amendment. But, because this circuit and SCOTUS have never confronted this issue, the law is not “clearly established” and she loses … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: While prison visitor strip search violated 4A, SCOTUS and this circuit have never ruled, so QI applies [and QI reigns supreme]

UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

The court finds officers baiting defendant into a recorded phone call where he was under a protective order and could not adequately respond “shocked the conscience” and would be suppressed. State v. Lewis, 2024 UT App 96, 2024 Utah App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

Excessive force claims are new for Bivens, and rejected. Here, it was his restraint in a courtroom by US Marshals and CSOs. Edwards v. Gizzi, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17100 (2d Cir. July 12, 2024). Plaintiff was shot in the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Excessive force claims are new under Bivens and can’t be brought

CO: State law can alter a sheriff’s agreement with CBP to enforce immigration law

While Colorado sheriffs have civil arrest powers, an agreement with CBP to enforce immigration law under 8 U.S.C. § 1357(g) violated state law. Nash v. Mikesell, 2024 COA 68, 2024 Colo. App. LEXIS 813 (July 3, 2024). In a chase … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CO: State law can alter a sheriff’s agreement with CBP to enforce immigration law

CA4: PC was shown def was likely a collector of CP so nine-month-old information wasn’t stale

“We are also not impressed by Sanders’s appellate contention that the facts in the Affidavit were so ‘stale’ as to negate probable cause.” Nine months. “Here, the Affidavit conveyed the same critical information to the magistrate judge — the person … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA4: PC was shown def was likely a collector of CP so nine-month-old information wasn’t stale

D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable

The owner of a vehicle who was not driving or in it when it was stopped has no standing to challenge the stop as opposed to an inventory search. “After considering, as it must, ‘all the facts and circumstances’ of … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable