DC: Illegal stop led to finding weapon, and it was not attenuated

Defendant was subjected to a stop that violated the Fourth Amendment. Information from that stop sufficiently led to a search of a dwelling producing a gun. That was fruit of the poisonous tree. There was a first search that could be said was not a product of the illegal stop. After the stop, they searched again and found what was overlooked. That was connected to the stop. James v. United States, 2024 D.C. App. LEXIS 282 (Aug. 1, 2024). (This case was under submission for 34 months. It also has a 2019 appellate case number. Was James in custody this whole time?)

“[I]t was not clearly established in June 2020 that an officer may not use pepper spray to arrest someone who is suspected of a serious crime, has made several violent threats, and is noncompliant. Officer Hemsted is entitled to qualified immunity.” Drew v. City of Des Moines, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19265 (8th Cir. Aug. 2, 2024).*

Six months from a NCMEC report and a child pornography search warrant was not stale. Other state cases were longer. State v. Edwards, 2024 ME 55 (Aug. 1, 2024).* (Once again, no case I’ve ever seen finds staleness in a child porn warrant. As I’ve said before, I had a client once who had his stuff for 40 years.)

This entry was posted in Attenuation, Qualified immunity, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.