Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

D.N.J.: Dashcam showed no RS for traffic stop

The court having reviewed the dashcam, the officer lacked reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. The government’s alternative argument that there was generalized reasonable suspicion of drug dealing isn’t timely. On the merits, it still is inadequate. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Dashcam showed no RS for traffic stop

W.D.Tex.: Need for Spanish speaking officer contributed to reasonable extension of stop

Defendant’s traffic stop was reasonable to begin with, and the fact it took 50 minutes before the dog alert was justified under all the circumstances, including getting a Spanish speaking officer to the scene. United States v. Hernandez, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Need for Spanish speaking officer contributed to reasonable extension of stop

D.Conn.: Not reasonable here to handcuff plaintiff for presenting handgun permit during traffic stop

Handcuffing plaintiff for presenting his handgun permit when stopped wasn’t reasonable. “Because, on the record read in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, no reasonable police officer could have believed he or she had probable cause to arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Not reasonable here to handcuff plaintiff for presenting handgun permit during traffic stop

E.D.N.C.: The fact the search violated the state constitution isn’t a factor on legality of the search in federal case

In a federal criminal case, the fact the search violated the state constitution isn’t a factor on legality of the search under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Breeden, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145729 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2021). Various factors … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: The fact the search violated the state constitution isn’t a factor on legality of the search in federal case

NY2: Justified search for mj didn’t justify looking at credit cards for forgery

The officer here could open a zippered pouch looking for marijuana, but he could not look at the credit cards inside to see if they were fraudulent. “On this record, Officer Zaleski’s discovery of three credit cards stacked inside a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY2: Justified search for mj didn’t justify looking at credit cards for forgery

W.D.La.: Court credits testimony officer could smell MJ as def’s vehicle drove by

“Corporal Moak testified that he smelled the odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle when he passed it on a narrow street. After the traffic stop was initiated and Moak approached the vehicle, he detected the ‘overwhelming’ odor of marijuana … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Court credits testimony officer could smell MJ as def’s vehicle drove by

N.D.Ill.: Corroborated anonymous 911 call about street corner drug dealing was RS

An anonymous 911 call about drug dealing at a Chicago intersection corroborated by officers’ observations was reasonable suspicion under Navarette. The caller also said she’d be calling back and 911 captured the number. There was little risk the caller couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Corroborated anonymous 911 call about street corner drug dealing was RS

M.D.La.: Court finds RS for a traffic stop, so CI tip doesn’t have to be considered

“Turning to the facts of the instant case, the Court must resolve the central question: did Nations see Defendant commit a traffic violation? Having listened to Nations’ testimony, observed him in open court, and reviewed the video and written transcript … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Court finds RS for a traffic stop, so CI tip doesn’t have to be considered

D.Maine: Officer’s subjective motivations for crime fighting didn’t make an otherwise reasonable traffic stop unreasonable

The state trooper that stopped defendant for an objective traffic violation apparently had subjective motivation to look for other crimes, but his subjective motives aren’t determinative of anything. United States v. Fagan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141949 (D. Maine July … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Maine: Officer’s subjective motivations for crime fighting didn’t make an otherwise reasonable traffic stop unreasonable

UT: Information omitted from SW affidavit added in still shows PC

The omitted information still leaves probable cause. Here, the warrant was for cell tower location information to connect defendant to the burglary of the victims’ house while they slept. State v. Gonzalez, 2021 UT App 83, 2021 Utah App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on UT: Information omitted from SW affidavit added in still shows PC

S.D.Ind.: Blood in car transporting shooting victim to ER justified SW for it

Defendant was driven to an ER after 2 am for having been shot. Out in the ER parking was the car with blood and guns in it. A state judge issued a search warrant for the car, and that resulted … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Blood in car transporting shooting victim to ER justified SW for it

E.D.Mo.: Flight is part of the RS calculus

Defendant fled from a police stop, and he wasn’t seized until the police laid hands on him. The hunch he was carrying a gun was correct. “First, as Officer Nash was attempting to exit his marked police car to engage … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Flight is part of the RS calculus

E.D.Wis.: Citing forfeiture seizure statute in SW application and warrant doesn’t require forfeiture, too

The government sought a search warrant under Rule 41 and also cited the forfeiture seizure statute, 18 U.S.C. § 983. Failure to seek forfeiture doesn’t void the search. United States v. Palma, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137870 (E.D.Wis. May 27, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Citing forfeiture seizure statute in SW application and warrant doesn’t require forfeiture, too

M.D.Ala.: That PC is debatable isn’t a lack of PC

There was a substantial basis for the state judge to issue this search warrant. A USMJ came to a different conclusion. That it is debatable doesn’t show a lack of probable cause. United States v. Mitchell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: That PC is debatable isn’t a lack of PC

D.C.: Illegal patdown without RS caused def’s flight; discard of gun in flight excluded

The patdown of defendant was manifestly unreasonable, and defendant’s flight was thereafter. The exclusionary rule should be applied to this. Johnson v. United States, 2021 D.C. App. LEXIS 187 (July 15, 2021):

Posted in Abandonment, Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.C.: Illegal patdown without RS caused def’s flight; discard of gun in flight excluded

W.D.Tenn.: SW for person is not limited like a protective sweep

A search warrant for a person is not limited as a protective sweep. It was not unreasonable to look under box springs. United States v. Johnson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132835 (W.D.Tenn. July 16, 2021). The protective sweep in the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: SW for person is not limited like a protective sweep

E.D.Pa.: Pushing shopping cart at night with an ATM in it was RS

Defendants having an ATM machine in a shopping cart late at night during a BLM “disturbance” was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Pennycooke, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132128 (E.D. Pa. July 15, 2021).* Since defendant concedes there was probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Pushing shopping cart at night with an ATM in it was RS

E.D.N.Y.: Any RS was dispelled before stop

The officer may have had reasonable suspicion as he approached the defendant, but, as he got closer, suspicion was dispelled. No reasonable suspicion for the stop. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Chavous, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131326 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Any RS was dispelled before stop

OR: History of drug possession and admission to recent use not RS for person or car

“Defendant’s history of drug possession together with his acknowledgement of recent drug use do not give rise to reasonable grounds to request his consent to search his person or his car at the time of the stop. The state failed … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: History of drug possession and admission to recent use not RS for person or car

N.D.Cal.: “Hot watch” order for real time travel information isn’t disclosable yet; matter still under investigation

The government made an “Application request[ing] an order compelling Sabre, a travel technology firm, ‘to provide representatives of the FBI complete and contemporaneous ‘real time’ account activity’ for an individual subject to an arrest warrant—what the government refers to as … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: “Hot watch” order for real time travel information isn’t disclosable yet; matter still under investigation