Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA10: Tasing a fleeing suspect is the seizure

Defendant continued to flee when he was finally Tasered. Then he was seized. United States v. Jeffers, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 3131 (10th Cir. Feb. 3, 2022). Plaintiff complains that inmate porters came into his prison cell and went through … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Tasing a fleeing suspect is the seizure

CA2: RS of man menacing with a gun supported stop at gunpoint

“In this case, in which defendant Justin Patterson stands charged with one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the government appeals from an order … suppressing the charged firearm because it … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: RS of man menacing with a gun supported stop at gunpoint

MS: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil tort cases for wrongful conviction

“Sedric Sutton seeks compensation under Mississippi Code Sections 11-44-1 to -15 (Rev. 2019), Compensation to Victims of Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment, after his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute was vacated by this Court.” The … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil tort cases for wrongful conviction

N.D.Ill.: Nothing about 911 man-with-a-gun call could be corroborated; backpack def set down when told to come outside was not abandoned

A 911 call about a man with a gun couldn’t be corroborated by anything at the scene. Officers got defendant outside and frisked him finding nothing. They searched his backpack, and that produced drugs. The government’s argument the backpack was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Nothing about 911 man-with-a-gun call could be corroborated; backpack def set down when told to come outside was not abandoned

D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

USMJ’s report is rejected in part. On the reasonable suspicion finding: “Here, the government relies on several factors to establish reasonable suspicion. The court has found that some of these factors, such as the visibly pulsing heartbeat and rapid breathing, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: RS lacking: nervousness not enough, and remainder was minimal

NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

Dismissal of a § 1983 excessive force case in federal court was not collateral estoppel for a state case under the state tort claims act. Hernandez v. Parker, 2022 N.M. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 1, 2022). Extending this stop was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

OH11: No RS for frisking a slumbering motorist

Police were called to a man slumped over his steering wheel maybe passed out. They roused him. Defendant’s patdown was not justified by reasonable suspicion. State v. Shoenberger, 2022-Ohio-253, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 232 (11th Jan. 31, 2022). Defendant’s roadside … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: No RS for frisking a slumbering motorist

DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

A warrant for premises found a visitor there, and the record shows nothing about why he was searched and the trial court upheld it. “As discussed, the factors the trial court relied upon to validate the patdown of Mr. Bingman—his … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Voluntariness | Comments Off on DC: Possession of a knife doesn’t mean RS for possession of a firearm

NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

Defendants were stopped in a car ¾ of a mile and driving away from the scene of a 7-11 robbery. All the officer knew was there were two black males involved. In their car, there were three black males. That … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Race and being ¾ mile from a robbery not RS

OH2: Police car blocking def’s car in a parking lot was a seizure without RS

“We conclude that a police officer’s act of positioning the cruiser in a way that made it difficult, albeit not impossible, for Jones to drive away constituted a show of authority sufficient to cause a reasonable person in Jones’ position … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH2: Police car blocking def’s car in a parking lot was a seizure without RS

MO: Trial court’s credibility findings on search incident of backpack was binding on appeal

The trial court suppressed the search of defendant’s backpack as incident to his arrest. The trial court heard conflicting testimony on whether it was within his reach, and concluded it was not. That’s binding on the standard of review. State … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on MO: Trial court’s credibility findings on search incident of backpack was binding on appeal

CA1: Def preserved Rodriguez argument without citing it

Defendant preserved his Rodriguez argument by stating that the stop was continued without reasonable suspicion but not citing the case. Nevertheless, he loses on the merits. United States v. Reyes, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1417 (1st Cir. Jan. 19, 2022). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: Def preserved Rodriguez argument without citing it

OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed

The state failed to prove that the stop was with reasonable suspicion. “While Officer Ianson’s questioning was not expressly coercive, the circumstances surrounding the request to search made the questioning impliedly coercive. Thus, the circumstances suggest that Massey merely submitted … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH12: Trial court’s finding of no RS and no consent affirmed

CA9: A visitor to premises has no standing in the curtilage

A visitor to premises has no standing in the curtilage. United States v. Castellanos, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1278 (9th Cir. Jan. 18, 2022). The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant when the officer shined a flashlight on him, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: A visitor to premises has no standing in the curtilage

M.D.Pa.: Stopping UPS truck for dog sniff of packages wasn’t unreasonable

Of two coconspirators in a package containing drugs, the named sender has standing but the coconspirator does not. Stopping the UPS truck for a dog sniff of the packages did not interfere with any reasonable expectation of privacy. Besides, there … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Stopping UPS truck for dog sniff of packages wasn’t unreasonable

WV: Officer admitted prior testimony was erroneous; not incredible as a matter of law

The officer obtaining the search warrant here was found to have mistakenly testified in federal court that he did not personally present this warrant to the magistrate. Admission of that mistake was credited here that he did present the affidavit. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on WV: Officer admitted prior testimony was erroneous; not incredible as a matter of law

W.D.Ky.: Arrest warrant doesn’t require executing officer to check into PC for it

If there is an arrest warrant, the executing officer doesn’t have to look behind it to determine its validity. Other alleged probable cause for defendant’s stop is immaterial. United States v. Cox, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7551 (W.D.Ky. Jan. 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Arrest warrant doesn’t require executing officer to check into PC for it

D.Minn.: Automobile exception applied to RV with engine not on blocks; was capable of movement

Whether the engine of a mobile home was running or not doesn’t matter. It was capable of movement so the search was valid under the automobile exception. “The fact that the motor home had a bathroom and kitchen and looked … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Automobile exception applied to RV with engine not on blocks; was capable of movement

C.D.Cal.: Admin SDT is not a 4A seizure

The Secretary of Labor’s administrative subpoena duces tecum here did not violate the Fourth Amendment. “A warrant is required only when government officials enter onto a private party’s premises without consent and forcibly take possession of documents.” Walsh v. Int’l … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Admin SDT is not a 4A seizure

S.D.Tex.: BOLO that matched defendant’s car was RS for stop

A BOLO that matched defendant’s car was reasonable suspicion for a stop. United States v. Yanez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6376 (S.D.Tex. Jan. 12, 2022). Cell phone communication and text messages about drug deals with the defendant gave probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: BOLO that matched defendant’s car was RS for stop