Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

Plaintiff was told for years to clean up his property from unsightly construction materials and equipment. After many failed efforts to get him to do so, the city obtained a court order to remove the property. It removed nine trailerloads … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

CA10: Def’s actions were completely consistent with innocence and did not add up to RS

The officer did not have reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop or its continuation. Defendant’s actions were consistent with somebody who had nothing to hide, and the district court’s findings got no presumption of correctness. Denial of the suppression motion reversed. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s actions were completely consistent with innocence and did not add up to RS

CA7: Younger and immunity bar ptf’s § 1983 claim against search

Plaintiff’s claims that the parties conspired to falsify evidence of this search against him, aside from being fantastical, was barred by Younger and qualified or absolute immunity for all the parties. Shaw v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Younger and immunity bar ptf’s § 1983 claim against search

E.D.N.Y.: Visual surveillance of a car in a parking lot is not a search; no REP in the license plate

Visual surveillance of plaintiff’s car in a parking lot is not a search. “Mr. Porter alleges that Investigator Tucci committed an unreasonable search by conducting surveillance of his vehicle in a parking lot and by looking up his plate and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Visual surveillance of a car in a parking lot is not a search; no REP in the license plate

TX: Affidavit incorporated in SW had specific description and saves SW from overbreadth argument

“The issue before us is whether the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is satisfied if a warrant describes the place to be searched as a fraternity house as a whole without specifying a suspect’s actual room in the house, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Particularity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX: Affidavit incorporated in SW had specific description and saves SW from overbreadth argument

D.Ariz.: To overcome Stone bar, pet’r has to proffer something about being denied “full and fair opportunity” to litigate 4A claim

To overcome Stone in a 2254, the petitioner has to proffer that he was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim. Failure to do so is fatal to claim. Bartels v. Arizona, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: To overcome Stone bar, pet’r has to proffer something about being denied “full and fair opportunity” to litigate 4A claim

E.D.Tenn.: Def doesn’t show a right to see whether the SW in his case was validly issued; that’s the lawyer’s call; and he pled guilty

“Petitioner alleges that Attorney Greene failed to present critical documents for Petitioner’s review prior to his guilty plea. Petitioner contends that he should have been shown ‘evidence of there being a valid search warrant,’ ‘computer chat logs where the government … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def doesn’t show a right to see whether the SW in his case was validly issued; that’s the lawyer’s call; and he pled guilty

CA2: Swearing to arrest warrant at direction of a prosecutor does not confer prosecutorial immunity

“Long-standing precedent makes clear that swearing to an arrest warrant affidavit and executing an arrest are traditional police functions, and performing such functions at the direction of a prosecutor does not transform them into prosecutorial acts protected by absolute immunity.” … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Independent source, Ineffective assistance, Privileges | Comments Off on CA2: Swearing to arrest warrant at direction of a prosecutor does not confer prosecutorial immunity

W.D.Ky.: Non-answers to questions added to RS

There was reasonable suspicion here from the officer’s observations and defendant’s non-answers to questions. United States v. Dunn, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41610 (W.D.Ky. Mar. 9, 2022).* Not filing a motion to suppress here was not ineffective assistance. Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Non-answers to questions added to RS

NY Kings: 911 call 6 dogs in Manhattan apt were uncared for not exigency for warrantless entry

“Upon a review of the record, we find that the evidence adduced at the hearing did not establish the existence of facts sufficient to provide the police officer with reasonable grounds to believe that an emergency existed which required the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on NY Kings: 911 call 6 dogs in Manhattan apt were uncared for not exigency for warrantless entry

N.D.Ga.: Officers can enter a bathroom for a protective sweep

The protective sweep of the bathroom was justified and defendant’s claim the officers didn’t need to enter the bathroom to look is rejected. United States v. Perez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26275 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 15, 2022). Plaintiff inmate’s claim that … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Officers can enter a bathroom for a protective sweep

E.D.Pa.: Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal

Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal. The record thus far precludes summary judgment. Dvortsova v. City of Philadelphia, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23868 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 9, 2022). Defendant’s 2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Tearing down plaintiff’s building was a seizure under Soldal

NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

Defendant stated a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel that defense counsel never obtained the search warrant materials to even investigate. Reversed to have the state produce it. People v. Tindley, 2022 NY Slip Op 00886, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

NC: Objection to seized evidence without a motion to suppress is waiver

Defendant objected at trial to admission of evidence, but it was not a timely motion to suppress. It is waived. State v. Draughon, 2022-NCCOA-58, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 53 (Feb. 1, 2022). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on NC: Objection to seized evidence without a motion to suppress is waiver

N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

There was a six day delay between seizure of six cell phones and issuance of a search warrant for them. This was reasonable under CA11 precedent. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Norwood, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 6 day delay in getting SW for seized cell phones not unreasonable

MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

Plaintiff sued a prosecutor for various things including the “privacy tort ‘of unreasonable intrusion into private facts.’” His computer was searched under a warrant and potential privileged material was obtained. Plaintiff’s own complaint says the prosecutor was given the information … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

Plaintiff is an attorney pro se alleging, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment violation in Colorado against a member of the House of Representatives for the January 6th insurrection. He claims a Fourth Amendment in the “people’s house” when he doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

CA7: Record supported finding that stop was not unreasonably extended

Whether a traffic stop was unreasonably extended for a drug dog to arrive is reviewed for clear error. The stop here was for overtinting, and the officer processed a warning by entering the information into the patrol car’s computer. He … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA7: Record supported finding that stop was not unreasonably extended

DE: Def counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Jones GPS case

“Because the Court will not find trial counsel ineffective for failing to ‘effectively’ raise an issue of first impression [on GPS placement], and because the Court believes that even if he had done so effectively, the issue would not have … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Jones GPS case

CA1: Def preserved Rodriguez argument without citing it

Defendant preserved his Rodriguez argument by stating that the stop was continued without reasonable suspicion but not citing the case. Nevertheless, he loses on the merits. United States v. Reyes, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 1417 (1st Cir. Jan. 19, 2022). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: Def preserved Rodriguez argument without citing it