“The issue before us is whether the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is satisfied if a warrant describes the place to be searched as a fraternity house as a whole without specifying a suspect’s actual room in the house, but an incorporated affidavit provides both descriptions. We hold that the particularity requirement is satisfied if an affidavit that is incorporated into the warrant includes, somewhere, a specific description of the place that was searched. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.” Patterson v. State, 2022 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 187 (Mar. 30, 2022).
Defendant’s 2255 IAC claims are cumulative to evidence otherwise admitted in the case and don’t alter the outcome. United States v. Edwards, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57914 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 30, 2022).*
There were multiple reasons to stop defendant. Denied. United States v. Banks, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58610 (E.D.Ky. Feb. 23, 2022),* adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58246 (E.D.Ky. Mar. 30, 2022).*
2254 petitioner’s posse comitatus argument was decided in his direct appeal, and it doesn’t usually lead to suppression anyway. Kessler v. Sec’y of the Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58096 (N.D.Fla. Feb. 23, 2022).*