Category Archives: Franks doctrine

E.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver included curtilage of house

Plaintiff’s parole search waiver for his house includes his curtilage. Kennedy v. White Cty., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180862 (E.D. Ark. Sep. 16, 2025). Admission of a photograph of defendant’s house taken from off the property did not violate the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Parole search waiver included curtilage of house

OR: PC for one computer isn’t PC for another

The computer search here wasn’t authorized by the probable cause showing, and it wasn’t harmless error. Probable cause for one device doesn’t permit search of all. State v. Schult, 343 Or. App. 376 (Sep. 10, 2025). “Here, Boudreau’s Franks argument … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OR: PC for one computer isn’t PC for another

S.D.Cal.: Handcuffing DV detainee was reasonable, but search of his bag was without RS

Officers responding to a 911 call about alleged domestic violence in public handcuffed defendant. This was reasonable at the time. Reasonable suspicion for a search of the cross body bag on him was lacking. He was handcuffed, there was no … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Handcuffing DV detainee was reasonable, but search of his bag was without RS

E.D.La.: AirBnb permittees have no REP in information already voluntarily provided to city

AirBnb and its permittees don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in information that was already essentially turned over to the city in getting permits in the first place. Bodin v. City of New Orleans, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174172 … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on E.D.La.: AirBnb permittees have no REP in information already voluntarily provided to city

W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

Defendant’s hiding a small pouch in another person’s car was not abandonment. He otherwise manifested a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Jensen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170474 (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2025). Defendant’s encounter with the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

MD: Pretext inquiry under state constitution same as 4A

Appellant shows no basis for construing pretextual stops under the state constitution differently than the Fourth Amendment. Riley v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 727 (Aug. 27, 2025).* Defendant’s encounter with the officer here after one with mall security was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Pretext, Probable cause, State constitution | Comments Off on MD: Pretext inquiry under state constitution same as 4A

CA9: A successful Franks challenge means deletion of offending material and not addition of what was missing

“Welch successfully challenged five statements in the search warrant affidavit, and the district court did not clearly err in rejecting his challenge to several additional statements. Having found that Welch made the necessary showing with respect to the five statements, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on CA9: A successful Franks challenge means deletion of offending material and not addition of what was missing

UT: Parole absconder’s purse could be searched

The officer said he searched the passenger’s purse in the car as part of the inventory and not as a search incident. In any event, she was a parole absconder, and it could be searched for that reason. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on UT: Parole absconder’s purse could be searched

D.P.R.: Franks: “defendants must do more than construct self-serving statements that refute the warrant affidavit”

United States v. Ruiz-Ruiz, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158695 (D.P.R. Aug. 14, 2025):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Franks: “defendants must do more than construct self-serving statements that refute the warrant affidavit”

N.D.Ill.: A mistake on the address was made up for by other detail; no Franks violation

“To the extent the lack of an address lessens a warrant’s particularity, the other information more than makes up for it. … In this case, Walters highlights one factual error: No glass door bearing the numbers ‘13624’ existed when the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: A mistake on the address was made up for by other detail; no Franks violation

CA7: Omission of snitch’s criminal history wasn’t material compared to the detail

Omission of the CI’s criminal history and that he was already in trouble with the law wasn’t material here for Franks purposes. The detail overcame it. United States v. Hecke, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19836 (7th Cir. Aug. 6, 2025):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: Omission of snitch’s criminal history wasn’t material compared to the detail

VA: Drugs on the person during a stop led to PC for vehicle

The patdown of defendant’s person produced drugs. That gave probable cause to search the car too. McCoy v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 445 (Aug. 5, 2025). The state gets a hearing on whether there was additional information they had … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on VA: Drugs on the person during a stop led to PC for vehicle

TX1: Ambiguous statement wasn’t false under Franks

Was this ambiguity a “reckless” “false statement” under Franks? No. Rosales v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5608 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) July 31, 2025):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX1: Ambiguous statement wasn’t false under Franks

TX4: Reformed affidavit in Franks challenge still had PC

Assuming defendant’s Franks argument was valid, he got a hearing, a paragraph of the affidavit was deleted, and probable cause still remained. Affirmed. Del Toro v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5255 (Tex. App. – San Antonio July 23, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX4: Reformed affidavit in Franks challenge still had PC

OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

The granting of the motion to suppress is reversed as not based on competent or credible evidence. The bodycam doesn’t fully support the officer’s testimony there were furtive movements before he got up to the driver’s window, but the bodycam … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

Not strictly a Fourth Amendment case, but interesting: Defendant’s place in a child molestation case was searched and adult porn was seized. The porn was admitted over objection as 404(b) evidence, and it was prejudicial and completely inadmissible because it … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

TX7: SW sworn to before wrong officer still in GF

The search warrant affidavit was not sworn to before a judge as required by the statute, but it was sworn to before an officer with the authority to take oaths. That was sufficient for the good faith exception to apply. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on TX7: SW sworn to before wrong officer still in GF

E.D.Wis.: Heck bar has to be pled in first defensive pleading

The Heck bar is an affirmative defense that has to be pled by defendants under F.R.C.P. 8(c). Megna v. Musial, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127980 (E.D. Wis. July 7, 2025). Defendant’s driving justified his stop. State v. Craven, 2025 Wash. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Heck bar has to be pled in first defensive pleading

W.D.Pa.: Someone actually succeeds in a Franks challenge

Defendant succeeds in a Franks challenge: Defendant’s case arose because the officer swore that defendant matched a surveillance video of a robbery. He really believed it, but he was wrong because there were obvious reasons to discount his belief. The … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Someone actually succeeds in a Franks challenge

CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable

Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting a warrant to search was reasonable. People v. Mills, 2025 CO 47, 2025 Colo. LEXIS 572 (June 30, 2025). Defendant’s cell phone was linked to his prostitution/human trafficking case, so there … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CO: Three-day delay between seizure of defendant’s car and getting SW for it was reasonable