NY Monroe Co.: The constitution doesn’t apply to citizen’s arrest

In a citizen’s arrest, if the citizen, not a law enforcement officer, violates the constitution or statute, the arrest will not be suppressed for that reason alone. His statement to an officer captured on video will not be suppressed because it was spontaneous. People v. Parris, 2024 NY Slip Op 24322, 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 25421 (Monroe Co. Dec. 20, 2024).

Post-conviction petitioner’s Franks claim is denied for its generality and not showing what he was talking about. Ogbeiwi v. State, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 576 (Dec. 23, 2024).*

The warrant was overbroad, but only the things seized in the overbroad part can be suppressed. The search was for stolen property that was in the back of a box truck, and the scope of search would include places where the things stolen could be hidden, and that led to firearms and drugs too. The cell phone search within the warrant was not overbroad either. United States v. Marquez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232328 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Private search, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.