GA: SW for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs

A search warrant for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs. State v. Johnson, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 18 (Jan. 28, 2025).

Defendant was on supervised release and the search of his cell phone producing child pornography was reasonable. United States v. Shove, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13428 (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2025).*

Identification by a single eyewitness is sufficient to establish probable cause for an arrest. There was no reason to doubt the reliability of the identification in this case. The existence of an arrest warrant and grand jury indictment created presumptions of probable cause that defendant failed to rebut. Lee v. Harris, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1668 (7th Cir. Jan. 27, 2025).*

Speculative statements about a potential Franks violation doesn’t support a 2255. United States v. Fisher, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13662 (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.