Category Archives: Franks doctrine

Three on Franks

This Franks argument fails. “Here, there is no indication that any false statement was intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, included in the affidavit. Even assuming the information provided by the CI was false or misleading, there is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Three on Franks

CA6: All family members have common authority over common areas of the house

All family members have common authority over common areas of the house. United States v. Campany, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 9518 (6th Cir. Apr. 8, 2022). Defendant’s Franks claim for ineffective assistance of counsel fails for failing to show what … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: All family members have common authority over common areas of the house

D.N.J.: That officers could have investigated more isn’t a Franks violation

“None of these allegations is sufficient to warrant a Franks hearing either. At bottom, Rodriguez is merely criticizing the tactics employed by the police during their investigation. See United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788, 791 (7th Cir. 2000) (explaining … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on D.N.J.: That officers could have investigated more isn’t a Franks violation

N.D.Okla.: Officer’s testimony of traffic offense wasn’t believed based on his words on video

“Considering the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that Phillips’ testimony that he observed a lane violation prior to initiating a traffic stop is not credible. The only evidence tending to support the commission of a traffic violation is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Officer’s testimony of traffic offense wasn’t believed based on his words on video

VA: Firefighters could call ME and police for dead body

When firefighters entered defendant’s property in response to a fire call, they found a body. It was within the scope of the fire entry to call the police and medical examiner. “Thus, all that the firefighters observed was no longer … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on VA: Firefighters could call ME and police for dead body

CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

Defendant’s car was permissibly seized for overtinting, and the subsequent search was reasonable as inventory. United States v. Perez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8697 (8th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022).* “Even assuming arguendo that Thrasher could make a substantial preliminary showing … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

CA7: Def’s detention during protective sweep looking for another was unreasonable

Defendant’s detention in an apartment building during a protective sweep for a fugitive that clearly wasn’t him was unreasonable. The district court’s denial of the motion to suppress is reversed. United States v. Segoviano, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8771 (7th … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Def’s detention during protective sweep looking for another was unreasonable

D.Ariz.: To overcome Stone bar, pet’r has to proffer something about being denied “full and fair opportunity” to litigate 4A claim

To overcome Stone in a 2254, the petitioner has to proffer that he was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim. Failure to do so is fatal to claim. Bartels v. Arizona, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: To overcome Stone bar, pet’r has to proffer something about being denied “full and fair opportunity” to litigate 4A claim

IA: Boilerplate language alone in an affidavit for SW does not establish nexus

Boilerplate language alone in an affidavit for warrant does not establish nexus. State v. Bracy, 2022 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 29 (Mar. 18, 2022) (citing § 6.14 of Treatise (§ 3:13 of 3d ed.). Omitting a CI’s criminal history from the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Boilerplate language alone in an affidavit for SW does not establish nexus

NC: PC shown for SW for GPS monitoring device

There was probable cause shown for the search warrant for defendant’s GPS monitoring device and his house for evidence of murder. State v. Gallion, 2022-NCCOA-164, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 178 (Mar. 15, 2022). 2254 petitioner’s sole ground for relief is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on NC: PC shown for SW for GPS monitoring device

D.Md.: Covid helped explain the delay in SW for cell phone search

This cell phone was reasonably seized under a warrant. The second warrant was issued a few weeks later, but, because of covid, the delay was reasonable. United States v. Reaves, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43243 (D.Md. Mar. 9, 2022). “Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Covid helped explain the delay in SW for cell phone search

D.Neb.: Omitting that there was no prior indication of drug dealing from anticipatory SW application not material

Omitting from the affidavit for an anticipatory warrant that there was no prior indication of drug dealing at the location isn’t material for Franks purposes. United States v. Espinoza, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39195 (D.Neb. Jan. 28, 2022). [There’s always … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Omitting that there was no prior indication of drug dealing from anticipatory SW application not material

WA: Covered stolen videogame console not “immediately apparent” for plain view

A covered suspected stolen Pac-Man videogame console was not in plain view because what was covered was not immediately apparent until uncovered. State v. Elwell, 2022 Wash. LEXIS 151 (Mar. 3, 2022) (on the entire record, however, this was harmless … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Covered stolen videogame console not “immediately apparent” for plain view

CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

“Where ‘a plaintiff claims that excessive force was used multiple times, “the court must segment the incident into its constituent parts and consider the officer’s entitlement to qualified immunity at each step along the way.”’ Wright, 962 F.3d at 865 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

NY Claims: Searching officer’s later perjury indictment over another SW affidavit supports claim over claimant’s conviction set aside as a result of disclosure

Claimant was convicted of drug possession. The state notified him after the fact that the arresting officer had been indicted for perjury for a false search warrant affidavit in an unrelated case. His criminal case was a credibility contest about … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY Claims: Searching officer’s later perjury indictment over another SW affidavit supports claim over claimant’s conviction set aside as a result of disclosure

N.D.Ga.: Apparently likelihood meth in office building could be moved justified warrantless entry

“[T]he Court finds that the evidence is materially credible and consistent and, taken as a whole, indicates that it appeared very likely that law-enforcement activity had been detected by the time of the warrantless entry, that there was a high … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Apparently likelihood meth in office building could be moved justified warrantless entry

S.D.W.Va.: AUSAs apparently failed duty to court to mitigate this Brady/Giglio issue before it reared its head

The court’s finding of the officer’s recklessness in this search warrant affidavit leads the government to file a motion to reconsider, presumably because it will become Brady/Giglio material in future cases as to the officer. Not only is that denied, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: AUSAs apparently failed duty to court to mitigate this Brady/Giglio issue before it reared its head

S.D.N.Y.: Seizing a cell phone in plain view with PC for later SW is reasonable

“[T]he court must conclude that probable cause existed to seize Kurland’s phone at the time of his arrest and that the plain view exception permitted the government to seize it. To be sure: simply seeing a device in plain view … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Seizing a cell phone in plain view with PC for later SW is reasonable

D.Conn.: Collective knowledge doctrine requires passing on some of the “knowledge”

Another officer stopping the defendant under the collective knowledge doctrine at least has to be informed of what the “knowledge” is that warrants the stop. Without it, no reasonable suspicion. United States v. Roman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30416 (D.Conn. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Collective knowledge doctrine requires passing on some of the “knowledge”

E.D.Mich.: A Franks challenge based on omissions is a higher bar to clear

When a Franks challenge is based on omissions, the bar is higher. Here, defendant didn’t meet it. United States v. McCoy, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30230 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 18, 2022):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: A Franks challenge based on omissions is a higher bar to clear