Category Archives: Franks doctrine

NY3: Typo in SW affidavit could be overlooked when context is apparent

A typographical error in the statement of probable cause could be overlooked when the affidavit is read as a whole, which is what the court is supposed to do. People v. Malloy, 2024 NY Slip Op 03203, 2024 N.Y. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: Typo in SW affidavit could be overlooked when context is apparent

E.D.Ky.: No PC for SW to test keys in a lock; only RS at most

Keys were found on the passenger seat of a pickup searched parked where a warrant was executed. A separate search warrant was obtained for the keys to determine whether they worked in the house lock. Plain view was argued. But, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: No PC for SW to test keys in a lock; only RS at most

ID: Still reasonable to rerun LPN information during stop, having done it earlier in day

Earlier in the day before the traffic stop, the officer had already run defendant’s LPN. It was reasonable to do it again during the stop, and this did not unconstitutionally lengthen the stop. State v. Tranmer, 2024 Ida. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Still reasonable to rerun LPN information during stop, having done it earlier in day

OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

A violation of the state prosecuting attorney’s subpoena power in felony cases was not subject to the exclusionary rule. In addition, obtaining third party information from an IP address is not a search. State v. Diaw, 2024-Ohio-2237, 2024 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Independent source, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

D.Mont.: A helpful summary of how to look at a potential Franks challenge

United States v. Howard, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101989 (D. Mont. June 7, 2024):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mont.: A helpful summary of how to look at a potential Franks challenge

CA10: No REP in fire scene premises totally destroyed

Taking of photographs of a fire scene of a mobile home that burned to the ground was not a Fourth Amendment violation. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the remains. United States v. Hernandez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA10: No REP in fire scene premises totally destroyed

D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

In a criminal copyright case, cookies on website led to defendant’s business and personal email accounts, and that gave nexus to them for the warrant. “Under the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that the search warrant reveals a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

GA: Merely having a traffic accident doesn’t justify SW for car for cause

Probable cause didn’t exist for a warrant to search defendant’s car after a traffic accident for the cause of the accident. “Here, given the circumstances as they existed when the search warrant was issued, we find that the magistrate did … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: Merely having a traffic accident doesn’t justify SW for car for cause

RI: REP in a police interrogation room when he was led to believe conversation with mother was private

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a police interrogation room while he was talking to his mother under both the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution when he was led to believe it was private. “Finally, the state … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on RI: REP in a police interrogation room when he was led to believe conversation with mother was private

D.Mont.: Reliable informant’s report defendant had a gun wasn’t RS because this is an open carry state

Defendant’s motion to suppress is granted on the exhibits and briefs without a hearing because there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop. “However, the information provided by the caller was insufficient on its own for the police to have … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Reliable informant’s report defendant had a gun wasn’t RS because this is an open carry state

CA7: Officer punching arrestee four times after arrestee punched him gets QI

“After Charles Brumitt struck Evansville Police Department Sergeant Sam Smith, Smith defended himself by punching Brumitt four times in the face, knocking him unconscious. Brumitt sued Smith under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that Smith used excessive force in violation … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Officer punching arrestee four times after arrestee punched him gets QI

CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

“After Corban Elmore’s teenage son suffered a drug overdose at Elmore’s home, law-enforcement officers secured the scene and prohibited anyone from entering the house. The officers then continued to investigate and allowed almost eight hours to elapse before applying for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant to get them. “Despite the narrowing of the third-party doctrine in other contexts, it remains applicable to call detail records. Notwithstanding recent technological changes, the phone numbers an individual dials are … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

Being a lawyer with a trust account, lawyer’s consent to subpoenas for their trust account. The lawyer’s argument that it’s an unreasonable search is frivolous. In re Doman, 2024 D.C. App. LEXIS 191 (May 16, 2024). Defendant didn’t show standing … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Franks doctrine, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of his shooting victim’s cell phone. Also, by statute the search of the phone more than 10 days after seizure was reasonable. State v. Lowry, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 804 (La. App. 5 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

MA: Mere denial is not a “substantial preliminary showing” for Franks

The issuing magistrate had probable cause to issue a search warrant for possible child pornography because the affidavit contained the officer’s description of an image depicting nude juveniles from 13-15 years, and the tip provider employee’s personal observation of the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on MA: Mere denial is not a “substantial preliminary showing” for Franks

S.D.Fla.: A search for stored video evidence must necessarily be broad; where could it be stored?

A search for stored video evidence must necessarily be broad because of the types of things on which it could be stored. United States v. Mila, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84465 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2024), adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: A search for stored video evidence must necessarily be broad; where could it be stored?

A word about Franks issues

Defendant’s quibbling¹ over the word choices in the affidavit didn’t provide a “substantial preliminary showing” for Franks. Review shows it wasn’t even inaccurate. United States v. Pettigrew, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 11328 (6th Cir. May 7, 2024).* [¹My choice of … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on A word about Franks issues

CA5: Franks civil case pleads enough to overcome QI

Plaintiff showed sufficient facts to support a § 1983 Franks v. Delaware claim for false statements supporting probable cause for arrest. Franks is clearly established law. Hughes v. Garcia, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 10922 (5th Cir. May 3, 2024). “Based … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Franks civil case pleads enough to overcome QI

D.P.R.: Def waived his Franks by providing nothing to show what’s what

“Although Defendant suggests that a Franks-like challenge was made during the suppression hearings in the Puerto Rico state court, he fails to develop any type of Franks argument in this case. Indeed, Defendant does not provide copies of the search … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def waived his Franks by providing nothing to show what’s what